Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

[Superwoops]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION



The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

AtomicRedstoner
Defendant



COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:
The Defendant, on four separate occasions, trafficked Weapons of Mass Destruction to third parties, amounting to four distinct counts of trafficking of WMDs.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. AtomicRedstoner (Defendant)

II. FACTS

1. On November 29th, the Defendant posted an in-game ad that read "Want a nuclear weapon then msg me!" (P-007)
2. At 2:58 pm EST, Superwoops contacted the Defendant, who agreed to meet him at the Zoo to sell him WMDs. (P-001)
3. Upon arriving at the Zoo, the Defendant prompted Superwoops to pay him. (P-013)
4. After making the payment at 3:17 pm EST, the Defendant dropped a Fatman, which had a mininuke loaded in it. (P-010, P-013)
5. At 4:10 pm EST, Superwoops contacted the Defendant again, who agreed to meet him at the Zoo again. (P-002)
6. Superwoops paid $3,800, at which time the Defendant dropped 9 mininukes, which Superwoops picked up. (P-008, P-009, P-011)
7. At 4:40 pm EST, Superwoops once again contacted the Defendant, offering a set of netherite armour in exchange for more WMDs. (P-003)
8. They met once more, at which time the Defendant dropped 3 more mininukes, which Superwoops picked up. (P-003)
9. At 4:51 pm EST, the Defendant dropped an additional 64 WMDs at spawn. (P-009)
10. Those 64 WMDs were picked up by Giibbless at spawn. (P-012)
11. The Defendant was in full knowledge that his actions were illegal. (P-004, P-005, P-007)​

III. CHARGES

The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. One Count of Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking for the sale of 2 WMDs to Superwoops, as distribution of these items is illegal under Criminal Code Act Part VI, §8.
2. One Count of Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking for the sale of 9 WMDs to Superwoops, as distribution of these items is illegal under Criminal Code Act Part VI, §8.
3. One Count of Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking for the sale of 3 WMDs to Superwoops, as distribution of these items is illegal under Criminal Code Act Part VI, §8.
4. One Count of Weapon of Mass Destruction Trafficking for the distribution of 64 WMDs to Giibbless, as distribution of these items is illegal under Criminal Code Act Part VI, §8.​

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:

1. For Count 1, the Prosecution recommends a fine of 50 Penalty Units and imprisonment for 30 minutes considering the aggravating factor of mens rea.
2. For Count 2, the Prosecution recommends a fine of 50 Penalty Units and imprisonment for 30 minutes considering the aggravating factor of mens rea and repeated disregard for the law.
3. For Count 3, the Prosecution recommends a fine of 50 Penalty Units and imprisonment for 30 minutes considering the aggravating factor of mens rea and repeated disregard for the law.
4. For Count 4, the Prosecution recommends the maximum punishment of a fine of 100 Penalty Units and 60 minutes imprisonment considering the aggravating factor of mens rea and repeated disregard for the law.​

V. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Spoiler: P-007

Spoiler: P-008

Spoiler: P-009

Spoiler: P-010

Spoiler: P-011

Spoiler: P-012

Spoiler: P-013

VI. WITNESSES

1. Superwoops - While I am counsel in this case, I will be substituted by secondary counsel when delivering witness testimony as permitted in Lawsuit: In Session - Vendeka Inc. and Pepecuu v. Department of Commerce [2025] FCR 107.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 29th day of January, 2026​

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@Atomicredstoner, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Muggy21]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order to Show Cause - Sua Sponte Dismissal of Charges 1-3


Upon review of the record, the Court has identified substantial concerns regarding the legal sufficiency of Counts 1 through 3. The Court hereby orders the Prosecution to show cause why these counts should not be dismissed.

Summary of Complaint

The Prosecution alleges that the Defendant committed four separate acts of WMD Trafficking. Counts 1 through 3 involve transactions between the Defendant and an individual identified as Superwoops. Count 4 involves the distribution of 64 WMDs to an individual identified as Giibbless at spawn. The Court observes that the Complaint and supporting evidence indicate that Superwoops initiated contact with the Defendant in response to a public advertisement, arranged each meeting, tendered payment or consideration, and personally received the items in question on three occasions.

Points of Concern

A. Government Participation in the Completed Offense
The trafficking statute under Criminal Code Act Part VI, Section 8 criminalizes the distribution of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Each of the transactions underlying Counts 1 through 3 required a recipient to accept delivery of the items. If Superwoops was acting in a law enforcement capacity or at the direction of the Department of Justice, then the Government itself served as the necessary counterparty to each transaction. The Court questions whether a completed trafficking offense can be sustained where the sole recipient was an agent of the prosecuting authority. The Prosecution shall address whether the Government can simultaneously facilitate the completion of an offense and prosecute the Defendant for that completed offense.


B. Entrapment Concerns Under Section 8(2)
The Court notes that while the Defendant publicly advertised his willingness to distribute WMDs, the actual completed transactions were carried out only because a law enforcement operative or cooperator responded to that advertisement, arranged meetings, and provided payment. The Prosecution shall address whether the methods employed by Superwoops, including repeated return purchases across three separate transactions within a short time span, may constitute inducement or encouragement within the meaning of Section 8(2)(b) of the Criminal Code Act. Essentially, the Prosecution shall address whether these methods created a substantial risk that the offense of trafficking, as distinct from conspiracy or attempted distribution, would be committed by persons other than those already ready to commit it.


​

Obligations of the Federal Court System

Judicial power is vested in the courts, whose role is to interpret the law as written by the legislature and administered by the Executive. Section 32(9) of the Constitution further guarantees every citizen the right to a speedy and fair trial presided over by an impartial Judicial Officer. Impartiality does not require passivity. Rather, it requires the Court to ensure that the proceedings before it are legally sound and that no party, including the Government, is permitted to advance charges that may be procedurally or substantively deficient. The Court's issuance of an Order to Show Cause does not represent advocacy on behalf of the Defendant; it represents the Court fulfilling its constitutional duty to safeguard the integrity of the judicial process and to ensure that the law is applied correctly and uniformly to all parties, including the prosecuting authority itself.


Thus, @Superwoops, you (and the DoJ) are ordered to show cause as to why Charges 1-3 should not be dismissed with prejudiced. The Government's response is due in 72 Hours. All other deadlines tolled.


So ordered,
Judge Mug