Lawsuit: Pending BurgersBeware v. Modzy & Spyders_Crypt [2026] DCR 23

[PvP2Max]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION

BurgersBeware Plaintiff

v.

Modzy (also known as Modzy_) First Defendant

Spyders_Crypt Second Defendant

COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On or about February 18th, 2026, the Plaintiff BurgersBeware was lawfully present at the public spawn area of the Commonwealth of Redmont when the Defendants, Modzy and Spyders_Crypt, deliberately spawned a massive quantity of diseased chickens throughout the spawn area. The Plaintiff contracted chicken pox twice in a single evening as a direct result of the Defendants' intentional conduct, was forced to make two emergency hospital visits, lost approximately 40 minutes of productive time, suffered a delay in selling $70.00 worth of product, and experienced genuine fear for their life. Both Defendants issued death threats against citizens who witnessed or reported their criminal conduct. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages, emotional distress damages, punitive damages, and referral for criminal investigation and disciplinary proceedings against the Second Defendant's Barrister license.

I. PARTIES

1. BurgersBeware (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), a citizen of the Commonwealth of Redmont, represented by Attorney PvM2Max of Titan Legal Group LLC.
2. Modzy (also known as "Modzy_") (hereinafter "First Defendant"), a citizen of the Commonwealth of Redmont holding the title of Realtor.
3. Spyders_Crypt (hereinafter "Second Defendant"), a citizen of the Commonwealth of Redmont holding the title of Barrister — a licensed legal practitioner of the Commonwealth.

II. FACTS

1. On or about February 18th, 2026, the First Defendant, Modzy, deliberately and intentionally spawned a massive quantity of chickens at the public spawn area of the Commonwealth of Redmont using chicken eggs, flooding the area with diseased animals. (P-001, P-002)
2. At the time of the incident, the Plaintiff, BurgersBeware, was lawfully present at spawn, en route to sell their wares — product with an estimated value of $70.00. (P-003)
3. The Plaintiff, upon observing the mass of chickens, approached the area and contracted chicken pox — a contagious disease recognized under the laws of the Commonwealth — as a direct result of the First Defendant's actions. This was the Plaintiff's first infection. (P-003, P-004)
4. Upon contracting chicken pox, the Plaintiff experienced debilitating symptoms including blindness, stomach ache, fatigue, and coughing, and was forced to rush to the hospital for emergency medical treatment out of genuine fear for their life. (P-003)
5. The Plaintiff received medical treatment including the administration of the cure. The cost of treatment was covered by the Commonwealth's healthcare system (Medicare). (P-003)
6. Later that same evening, the Plaintiff contracted chicken pox from the Defendants' chickens a second time, necessitating a second hospital visit and a second course of treatment. (P-003)
7. In total, the Plaintiff lost approximately 40 minutes from completing their tasks, including travel time to and from the hospital on two occasions, recovery time, and the delay in selling their product. (P-003)
8. The First Defendant, Modzy, made the following admissions and statements in public chat demonstrating intentional conduct:
   • "more people should be getting sick" — expressing a desire for widespread infection. (P-004)
   • "enjoy the disease" — directed at those present at spawn. (P-004)
   • "biological warfare" / "yeah" / "something like that" — acknowledging the nature of the conduct when confronted. (P-004, P-005)
   • "those are made up words" — dismissing the criminal statute cited by a bystander. (P-005)
   • "all this fuss for a bunch of chickens" — minimizing the impact while not denying the conduct. (P-005)
9. The First Defendant, Modzy, made the following direct threats against citizens present at spawn:
   • "we'll slowly kill you via chicken pox" — a death threat via biological means. (P-006)
   • "ill will behead thee if you hurt my chickens" — a threat of violence. (P-006)
10. The Second Defendant, Spyders_Crypt, was physically present at the scene during the incident, among the chickens, and participated in the conduct alongside the First Defendant. (P-001, P-002)
11. The Second Defendant, Spyders_Crypt, made the following statements in public chat:

• "what law are we allegedly breaking anyways" — using "we," thereby confirming joint participation with the First Defendant. (P-005)
• "well if any cops hop on run" — acknowledging the criminal nature of the conduct and expressing intent to evade law enforcement. (P-005)
• "you snitch high chance you'll die" — a direct death threat against any citizen who would report the criminal conduct to authorities. (P-006)

1. The Second Defendant, Spyders_Crypt, holds the title of Barrister — a licensed legal practitioner within the Commonwealth of Redmont. As an officer of the court, the Second Defendant is held to the highest standards of professional conduct and ethical behavior. The Second Defendant's participation in the intentional transmission of disease, conspiracy to commit criminal offenses, and issuance of death threats against witnesses constitutes a severe violation of the professional and ethical obligations attendant to their licensure. (P-001, P-002, P-005, P-006)
2. CNN, an independent news organization within the Commonwealth, published a report on the incident. In the CNN report, the First Defendant, Modzy, admitted that they spawned the chickens deliberately, stating they "was bored... and thought it would be hilarious" to cover spawn in baby chickens. The CNN report confirmed that medical professionals verified that the presence of many chickens increases the chance of contracting chicken pox. The report further noted that the First Defendant admitted they did so to cause chicken pox. (P-007)
3. The Plaintiff suffered significant emotional distress as a result of the Defendants' conduct, including genuine fear for their life upon contracting chicken pox, anxiety and distress from being infected a second time on the same day, and terror resulting from the death threats issued by both Defendants. (P-003)
4. Multiple other citizens were also infected during the incident, demonstrating the widespread and reckless nature of the Defendants' conduct. The Defendants' actions constituted a public health emergency affecting the entire spawn area of the Commonwealth. (P-007)
5. The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court take judicial notice of the fact that the Second Defendant, Spyders_Crypt, holds an active Barrister license within the Commonwealth of Redmont, and that such status imposes heightened professional and ethical obligations under the law.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

Count I — Intentional Transmission of a Contagious Disease (Against First Defendant, Modzy) 17. The Criminal Code Act establishes the offense of Intentional Transmission of a Disease: "A person commits an offence if they intentionally infect, or threaten to infect, another player with a contagious disease." 18. The First Defendant intentionally spawned diseased chickens at spawn for the express purpose of infecting citizens with chicken pox, as evidenced by their own admissions: "more people should be getting sick," "enjoy the disease," and the CNN interview in which they admitted doing it to cause chicken pox. 19. The Plaintiff was infected twice as a direct result of the First Defendant's intentional conduct. The first infection constitutes a first offense (20 Penalty Units / $2,000 and 20 minutes imprisonment). The second infection on the same day constitutes a second offense (40 Penalty Units / $4,000 and 40 minutes imprisonment). 20. Pursuant to the Criminal Code Act, Part I, Section 6(1): "In civil lawsuits, crimes may be used to seek damages, although damages are not presumed." And Section 6(1)(b): "Conviction is not a requirement for a crime to be regarded as a fact in a civil lawsuit."

Count II — Intentional Transmission of a Contagious Disease (Against Second Defendant, Spyders_Crypt) 21. The Second Defendant was present at the scene, participated in the conduct, and encouraged the spread of disease. As a co-conspirator and active participant, the Second Defendant bears equal liability for the intentional transmission of chicken pox to the Plaintiff. 22. The Second Defendant's use of "we" ("what law are we allegedly breaking") confirms joint participation and shared intent with the First Defendant.

Count III — Conspiracy (Against Both Defendants) 23. The Criminal Code Act, Part X, Section 19, establishes the offense of Conspiracy: "A person commits an offence if they intend to commit a crime, even if it has not yet been carried out." 24. Both Defendants acted in concert to intentionally transmit disease to citizens at spawn. The Second Defendant's statement "well if any cops hop on run" demonstrates knowledge of criminal conduct and mutual agreement to engage in and evade accountability for such conduct. Conspiracy penalties are capped at 50% of the principal crime's sentence.

Count IV — Assault (Against Both Defendants) 25. The Criminal Code Act defines Assault as, in relevant part, placing "another player in a position of danger, including but not limited to pointing a weapon at them." 26. The deliberate flooding of a public area with disease-carrying animals placed the Plaintiff and all citizens present in a position of danger. The chickens were, in effect, deployed as biological weapons — a characterization the First Defendant themselves acknowledged ("biological warfare").

Count V — Witness Intimidation and Threats (Against Both Defendants) 27. Both Defendants issued direct threats against citizens who spoke out about the criminal conduct:

• Spyders_Crypt: "you snitch high chance you'll die"
• Modzy: "we'll slowly kill you via chicken pox"
• Modzy: "ill will behead thee if you hurt my chickens" (P-008)

1. These statements constitute threats of violence and witness intimidation, intended to discourage citizens from reporting criminal conduct to law enforcement.

Count VI — Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (Against Both Defendants) 29. The Defendants' conduct was extreme, outrageous, and beyond all bounds of decency. The Plaintiff: (a) genuinely feared for their life upon contracting a disease they did not consent to; (b) was infected a second time on the same day; (c) was subjected to death threats by both Defendants; and (d) suffered significant emotional distress, anxiety, and trauma as a result of the totality of the Defendants' conduct.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court award the following relief:

A. Compensatory Damages

1. $1,000.00 — for the value of medical treatment received across two hospital visits (Aciclovir administration, physician consultation, and associated medical care), notwithstanding that such costs were borne by the Commonwealth's healthcare system.
2. $500.00 — for lost business revenue and opportunity costs, including $70.00 in delayed product sales and 40 minutes of lost productive time.

B. Emotional Distress Damages 3. $15,000.00 — for severe emotional distress suffered by the Plaintiff, including genuine fear of death upon contracting chicken pox, the trauma of being infected twice in a single day, and the terror caused by direct death threats from both Defendants.

C. Punitive Damages 4. $25,000.00 — against the First Defendant, Modzy, for intentional, premeditated, and admitted conduct constituting a biological attack on a public space, compounded by death threats and a complete disregard for public safety. 5. $25,000.00 — against the Second Defendant, Spyders_Crypt, for active participation in the intentional transmission of disease, conspiracy, and the issuance of death threats — conduct rendered especially egregious by the Second Defendant's status as a licensed Barrister and officer of the Court.

D. Legal Fees 6. 30% of the total cost of legal fees incurred by the Plaintiff in retaining the services of Titan Legal Group LLC.

E. Referral for Criminal Investigation 7. The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court refer this matter to the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Commonwealth Prosecutor for criminal investigation and prosecution, upon reviewing the evidence of Intentional Transmission of a Contagious Disease, Conspiracy, Assault, and Witness Intimidation.

F. Disciplinary Referral 8. The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court refer this matter for professional disciplinary proceedings against the Second Defendant Spyders_Crypt, including but not limited to suspension or revocation of the Second Defendant's Barrister license, for conduct unbecoming of an officer of the Court.

G. Total Relief Sought Compensatory Damages (Medical) — $1,000.00 Compensatory Damages paid to the State (Lost Revenue) — $500.00 Emotional Distress Damages — $15,000.00 Punitive Damages (Modzy) — $25,000.00 Punitive Damages (Spyders_Crypt) — $25,000.00 Subtotal — $66,500.00 Legal Fees (30%) — $10,000 TOTAL — $76,500.00

Plus referral for criminal investigation to DHS, and referral for disciplinary proceedings against Spyders_Crypt's Barrister license.

EVIDENCE:

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

Spoiler: P-006

Spoiler: P-007

Spoiler: P-008

Spoiler: Proof of Legal Representation

WITNESSES:

1. Hat_Miku — Eyewitness present at spawn during the incident.
2. RaiTheGuy07 — Expert witness; licensed physician who can testify to the medical effects of chicken pox.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 18th day of February 2026.

BurgersBeware, Plaintiff By their attorney, PvM2Max, Titan Legal Group LLC

 

[PvP2Max]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION (ASSET PRESERVATION ORDER)​

The Plaintiff moves that the Court issue an Emergency Injunction freezing liquid cash and transferable assets of the Defendants — and of Relief Defendant MasterCaelen, as the direct transferee of assets disposed of by the First Defendant during the pendency of this litigation — in an amount equal to or exceeding the Prayer for Relief in this action, pending final disposition, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

This Court has authority to issue an Emergency Injunction to prevent harm and preserve the status quo pending adjudication.
URL: Guide - Court Orders
Quote: "Emergency Injunction Issued before the court has tried a case. The goal of an emergency injunction is to prevent harm."
Injunction relief is specifically designed to prevent harm and maintain the status quo, which includes preventing dissipation of assets where judgment would otherwise be frustrated.
URL: Guide - Court Orders
Quote: "Emergency Injunction … The goal of an emergency injunction is to prevent harm."
Case law confirms that an asset-freeze injunction is not granted merely because a lawsuit is filed; the moving party must show an evidentiary basis for risk of asset flight or dissipation.
URL: Lawsuit: Adjourned - IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131
Quote: "Denied. A lawsuit in of itself is not evidence of a risk of asset flight nor can this Court assume mal-intent from a party properly represented by Counsel."
Case law also confirms that where the record supports imminent dissipation or transfer such that a judgment may become uncollectible, an Emergency Injunction freezing assets is appropriate.
URL: Lawsuit: Adjourned - Volt Bank, Inc. v. .AstuteSundew823 [2025] FCR 119
Quote: "Without immediate intervention, the Defendant can transfer, sell, encumber, or dissipate these assets, rendering any judgment uncollectible…"
In Volt Bank, the Court granted emergency injunctive relief on that basis.
URL: Lawsuit: Adjourned - Volt Bank, Inc. v. .AstuteSundew823 [2025] FCR 119
Quote: "The Emergency Injunction is granted in full."
The Federal Court has previously authorized precisely the type of relief sought here—freezing assets to the prayer for relief to preserve collection pending adjudication.
URL: Lawsuit: Adjourned - The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Westray & Partypig678 [2022] FCR 47
Quote: "The Commonwealth asks that all of Former President Westray's & First lady Partypig678's asset will be frozen from most to least valuable until the value of the assets exceeds the prayer for relief."

In that same matter, the Court granted the emergency injunction and ordered that assets be frozen from the initial filing, with DOJ empowered to log and itemize them.
URL: Lawsuit: Adjourned - The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Westray & Partypig678 [2022] FCR 47
Quote: "I will be granting this Emergency Injunction - All assets of the Defendant and Co-Defendant from the initial filing of the case are herby frozen and cannot be exchanged or used. I grant a Search Warrant for the DOJ to properly log and itemize a list of these assets."
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Plaintiff submits that, unlike the "mere lawsuit" posture rejected in [2025] FCR 131, the record here contains affirmative evidence of imminent asset dissipation and flight risk, creating a substantial risk that any civil judgment will be rendered practically uncollectible absent immediate preservation relief.
This flight risk is established by contemporaneous public reporting and Defendant admissions, attached as exhibits:

a. Exhibit P-001 (DC Independent Publishers NPO; #news; posted 01:01 AM, Friday, 20 February 2026; author FloorIsTired). The publication describes a property transfer "that involved 38 plots," "valued at least at R$ 6,000,000," described as "a final deal to retire," and reports Modzy's statement, "I'd off my entire portfolio," including substantial liquid value in "bank notes and cash held in Financial institutions," with "cash and item assets alone valued approximately around R$ 650,000." (P-001)

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001 — DC Independent Publishers Article

b. Exhibit P-002 (Discord screenshot; Modzy response to counsel's posting of the lawsuit, prior to publication of the article). Modzy states: "retiring from dc in about a week and spyder doesn't have much I don't think so good luck champion," evidencing imminent departure and further corroborating dissipation/collection risk. (P-002)

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002 — Modzy Discord Response

RELIEF DEFENDANT — MASTERCAELEN (FRAUDULENT TRANSFER)

The record establishes that the First Defendant, Modzy, transferred substantially all of his assets — approximately 38 plots valued at R$ 6,000,000 or more, plus approximately R$ 650,000 in liquid cash, bank notes, and high-value items — to MasterCaelen, a player who joined the Commonwealth only four (4) days prior to the transaction. (P-001)
The transfer was facilitated through Player-to-Player Real Money Trading (P2P RMT). It is well established that RMT transactions carry no legal protections, are not enforceable under Commonwealth law, and provide no legally cognizable consideration within the jurisdiction of this Court. The server itself provides NO guarantees for such trades. (P-001)
Because the consideration received by Modzy was real-life currency — which is entirely outside the jurisdiction, enforcement authority, and cognizance of this Court — the transfer is, for all purposes relevant to this proceeding, a transfer for no legally recognizable consideration. The Court cannot verify, value, or enforce the IRL payment, and therefore Modzy's in-game assets were effectively gifted away from the perspective of Commonwealth law.
The transfer occurred on or about February 18, 2026 — contemporaneous with the filing of this lawsuit and at a time when the First Defendant was aware of the pending litigation, as evidenced by his direct response to counsel's posting of the case. (P-002)
MasterCaelen now holds assets that were part of the First Defendant's estate at the time of filing and that are directly traceable to the First Defendant. Regardless of MasterCaelen's subjective good faith, those assets are properly subject to the Court's preservation authority where, as here, the transfer was made by a litigation defendant, during pending litigation, for no consideration cognizable under Commonwealth law, as part of a publicly announced plan to "retire" and leave the jurisdiction.
Plaintiff does not allege that MasterCaelen participated in the underlying conduct giving rise to this lawsuit. MasterCaelen is named solely as a Relief Defendant — a party who holds assets that may be necessary to satisfy a judgment and that were transferred under circumstances warranting judicial scrutiny and preservation.
The above is the exact sort of evidence that distinguishes a denied "asset freeze because the prayer is high" motion from a properly supported preservation request. Here, the Defendant is publicly describing the sale/transfer of his portfolio and imminent retirement, including liquid value that can be moved quickly and beyond reach.
The harm is therefore the precise harm recognized as cognizable in emergency injunction practice: the loss of any meaningful ability to collect on a final judgment due to dissipation of assets during litigation. Volt Bank ([2025] FCR 119) recognizes that where assets may be transferred or dissipated such that "any judgment [is] uncollectible," emergency relief is appropriate.
The requested injunction is narrowly tailored and proportional. Plaintiff does not seek punishment or prejudgment execution. Plaintiff requests only preservation of assets up to an amount equal to or exceeding the Prayer for Relief — including assets now held by Relief Defendant MasterCaelen that are directly traceable to the First Defendant's pre-litigation estate — consistent with the "freeze until the value exceeds the prayer for relief" framework previously accepted and granted in [2022] FCR 47 (Westray & Partypig678).
Plaintiff further requests an accounting/logging mechanism sufficient to make any freeze effective, consistent with [2022] FCR 47 Westray & Partypig678, where the Court authorized DOJ to "log and itemize" the restrained assets.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Issue an Emergency Injunction ordering that Defendants Modzy (also known as Modzy_) and Spyders_Crypt, and Relief Defendant MasterCaelen, and any agents acting in concert with them, are prohibited from transferring, selling, gifting, encumbering, laundering, or otherwise disposing of liquid cash and transferable assets from most to least valuable until the value of the frozen assets equals or exceeds the Prayer for Relief in this action, pending final disposition;
B. Order that the restraint applies to assets held as of the initial filing of this case and continuing through final disposition, to prevent post-filing dissipation — including assets transferred by the First Defendant to MasterCaelen on or about February 18, 2026, which are traceable to the First Defendant's pre-litigation estate;
C. Order Defendants and Relief Defendant MasterCaelen to provide a prompt accounting identifying bank balances, liquid cash, significant item reserves, shares, and real property sufficient to implement the injunction; and/or authorize DOJ to log and itemize restrained assets as necessary to effectuate the Order;
D. In the alternative, or in addition, impose a constructive trust over the assets transferred from the First Defendant to MasterCaelen, to preserve such assets for potential satisfaction of any judgment entered in this action;
E. Grant such further relief as the Court deems just and proper to prevent harm pending adjudication.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 18th day of February 2026.
BurgersBeware, Plaintiff
By their attorney, PvM2Max, Titan Legal Group LLC