Lawsuit: Pending Bloatmaxxer v. Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 40

[Fdog180]

Case Filing​

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

BloatMaxxer (Represented by Fdog180, Contract/Corporate Law Barrister)
Plaintiff
v.
The Department of Commerce, Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant


COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

This case concerns the Department of Commerce's failure to provide adequate guidance to the Plaintiff during the LLC-to-corporation conversion process under Part VIII of the Legal Entity Act, their subsequent failure to exercise their statutory power of conversion as receiver, their failure to provide adequate notice of the winding up of TuffBrokerage LLC, and their failure to return the Plaintiff's personal assets following dissolution — causing a financial loss of approximately $16,000.


I. PARTIES

1. BloatMaxxer, sole director and member of TuffBrokerage LLC and TuffSecurities LLC, represented by Fdog180 (Contract Law Barrister)
2. The Department of Commerce, Commonwealth of Redmont — Defendant, the government department responsible for business registration, conversion, receivership, dissolution, and asset recovery procedures under the Legal Entity Act

II. FACTS

1. On 27 January 2026, the Plaintiff registered TuffBrokerage LLC and TuffSecurities LLC with the Department of Commerce. Both registrations were signed and approved by DOC Secretary ElysiaCrynn on the same date. (Evidence: P-001, P-002)
2. On 16 February 2026, a DOC officer (gribble19) posted a warning on both registration threads advising the Plaintiff that under Part VIII Section 1(1) of the Legal Entity Act, both entities were required to be converted to corporations within 30 days, using the company docket as a guide. (Evidence: P-003)
3. On 21 February 2026: five days after the warning and with approximately 25 days remaining on the conversion deadline. The Plaintiff posted a direct public request on the TuffSecurities thread asking how to complete the conversion and requesting to be contacted, stating "how do I do that? please msg me I don't always check this." The Department of Commerce did not respond to this request at any time. (Evidence: P-004)
4. As a direct result of receiving no guidance from the Defendant, the Plaintiff was unable to complete the conversion process within the required 30 day period.
5. On 29 March 2026, the Plaintiff received a notice of receivership advising that both entities would be dissolved pursuant to Part III Section 9 of the Legal Entity Act. At no point did the DOC exercise its statutory power under Part VIII Section 1(1)(b) to convert the entities as receiver, despite having full power to do so.
6. The winding up announcement published by the DOC in #government-announcements did not include any direct notification or ping to BloatMaxxer as the sole director and member of TuffBrokerage LLC. BloatMaxxer had no reasonable means of becoming aware of the announcement. The post was made at 2:59am in Bloatmaxxer's time zone.
7. At the time of dissolution, TuffBrokerage LLC held approximately $16,000 in assets, all of which were personally owned by the Plaintiff. The precise figure is to be confirmed by server logs held by the Department of Commerce or server administration, which the Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court order be produced during discovery.
8. The Plaintiff's assets have not been returned to date. The Plaintiff retained Fdog180 Legal Services on 7 May 2026 to recover those assets.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. Administrative Negligence — The Defendant had a duty to assist registered business owners in understanding and complying with the conversion requirements under Part VIII Section 1(1) of the Legal Entity Act. The Plaintiff made a direct, public request for guidance on 21 February 2026 with 25 days remaining on the deadline. The Defendant's failure to respond directly caused the Plaintiff's inability to meet the conversion deadline, the subsequent dissolution, and the resulting loss of approximately $16,000 in personal assets. But not for the Defendant's failure to respond, the Plaintiff would have been able to converted the entities in time and suffered no loss.
2. Failure to Exercise Statutory Power of Conversion — Under Part VIII Section 1(1)(b) of the Legal Entity Act, upon the entities being placed into receivership, the DOC as receiver had statutory power to either convert or dissolve TuffBrokerage LLC. The DOC chose dissolution despite having the power to convert, and despite the non-conversion being a direct result of the DOC's own failure to respond to the Plaintiff's request for guidance.
3. Direct Asset Custody as Receiver — Upon appointment as receiver under Part I Section 3(3) of the Legal Entity Act, the DOC assumed full statutory control over all assets and liabilities of TuffBrokerage LLC, including the approximately $16,000 in assets personally owned by the Plaintiff. The DOC is directly accountable as legal custodian for those assets and their whereabouts.
4. Defective Notice — Breach of Part III Section 9(6) — The Legal Entity Act requires the winding up of an Incorporated Entity to be publicly announced in #government-announcements and must request persons with an interest to come forward. The DOC's announcement failed to include any direct notification or ping to notify BloatMaxxer directly. A passive announcement that the affected party had no reasonable means of receiving is insufficient to constitute adequate notice. Accordingly, the 14-day forfeiture provision under Part III Section 9(8)(a) was never properly triggered, and the Plaintiff has not voluntarily or permanently surrendered any claim to his assets.
5. Unjust Enrichment — The approximately $16,000 held by TuffBrokerage LLC at the time of dissolution was entirely and personally owned by the Plaintiff. No provision of the Legal Entity Act or any other law of the Commonwealth of Redmont entitles the Defendant to retain those funds following dissolution. The Defendant's retention of those assets without legal basis constitutes unjust enrichment at the Plaintiff's expense.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. Compensatory damages of approximately $16,000, or such precise amount as confirmed by server logs produced in discovery, representing the full value of personal assets held by TuffBrokerage LLC at the time of dissolution
2. Consequential damages for financial losses suffered as a result of the unavailability of those funds from the date of dissolution to the date of judgment
3. An order compelling the Department of Commerce or server administration to produce server logs confirming the precise asset balance of TuffBrokerage LLC at the time of dissolution
4. A declaration that the 14-day forfeiture provision under Part III Section 9(8)(a) of the Legal Entity Act was not properly triggered due to defective notice
5. Legal fees pursuant to the Legal Damages Act at 25% of the total case value
6. Such further relief as the Court deems just and appropriate

EVIDENCE

• P-001 — TuffBrokerage LLC registration thread (27 January 2026)
• P-002 — TuffSecurities LLC registration thread (27 January 2026)
• P-003 — gribble19's 30-day conversion warning post (16 February 2026)
• P-004 — BloatMaxxer's unanswered request for guidance (21 February 2026)
• P-005 — Receivership notice (29 March 2026)
• P-006 — Server logs confirming asset balance [to be produced in discovery]

WITNESSES

• ElysiaCrynn — DOC Secretary, signed original registrations
• gribble19 — DOC Officer, issued conversion warning, failed to respond to Plaintiff's request for guidance

---

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 10th day of May 2026


Fdog180 — Contract/Corporate Law Barrister on behalf of BloatMaxxer (Plaintiff)

 

[aubunny]

Writ of Summons

@Superwoops is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Bloatmaxxer v Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 40​

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

---

 

[Bloatmaxxer]

I, Bloatmaxxer, consent to Fdog180 representing me in the Disrict Court of Redmont for this matter

 

[Franciscus]

This is a note that I am now the presiding judicial officer on this case. All deadlines remain extant.

 

[Fdog180]

NOTICE TO THE COURT — WITHDRAWAL OF PROCEEDINGS

Your Honor,
I write on behalf of the Plaintiff, BloatMaxxer, to respectfully inform the Court that these proceedings are hereby withdrawn.

Following the filing of this complaint, the Plaintiff was contacted by a member of server administration who confirmed that the assets formerly held by TuffSecurities LLC had in fact been returned to the Plaintiff prior to the commencement of these proceedings. Regrettably, the Plaintiff was not made aware of this until after the complaint had been filed.

Had this information been available to us at the time of filing, these proceedings would not have been commenced. The Plaintiff and I sincerely apologize to the Court and to the Department of Commerce for any inconvenience caused by this filing.

We respectfully request that the Court dismiss this matter and close the proceedings accordingly.

Respectfully submitted,
Fdog180 on behalf of BloatMaxxer (Plaintiff)