Lawsuit: Pending BastionBank v. anasgamerah

[unalign]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


BastionBank
Plaintiff

v.

anasgamerah
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On 2026-08-29, BastionBank lent 20k to anasgamerah to purchase plot R136. anasgamerah was reminded several times that a loan payment was due and BastionBank has not received a single word from anasgamerah.

I. PARTIES
1. BastionBank - Plaintiff
2. anasgamerah - Defendant
3. unalign - banker at BastionBank

II. FACTS
1. The Plaintiff offered the Defendant a contract (P-002) for a loan where "BastionBank agrees to lend the Borrower $20,000.00" constituting an Offer. (P-001)
2. The Defendant responded to the Plaintiff's offer with "I agr" and "Agrea", constituting Acceptance for the loan. (P-001)
3. Right after signing the loan, the Plaintiff sent the $20,000 to the seller (Mr_Andrew1), the Defendant sent $31,000 to the seller (Mr_Andrew1), the seller transferred R136 to the Defendant constituting both the Consideration for the loan and a benefit for the Defendant at the Plaintiff's expense. (P-003)
4. The Defendant had a clear intention of getting the loan to purchase R136 by saying "I need 20k I will build with the rest" consituting Intent for the loan. (P-001)
5. The Defendant had over 5 days of playtime when agreeing to the loan constituting Capacity for the loan. (P-004)
6. Facts 1 to 5, constitute a contract under the Contracts Act.
7. The first installment was due on 2026-09-29 and on 2026-08-30, unalign (banker at BastionBank), asked to the Defendant in Discord "yo @anasgamerah can u pay?". The Defendant didn't respond and defaulted on the loan by failing to make a scheduled payment as in Section 5 of the contract (P-002). (P-005)
8. On 2026-10-02, unalign (banker at BastionBank) sent a Default Notice with 14 days to cure. The Defendant didn't respond. (P-005)
9. By 2026-10-16, the Defendant didn't yet respond to unalign constituting a Breach of Contract the RCCA for failing to perform obligations under a valid and enforceable contract without lawful excuse. (P-005)
10. unalign continued pinging the Defendant in good faith in Discord until 2026-10-17. The Defendant didn't respond any time from the first installment reminder to today. (P-005)

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant failed to respond to the Default Notice within 14 days notice constituting a Breach of Contract the RCCA for failing to perform obligations under a valid and enforceable contract without lawful excuse.
2. In the Alternative where the loan was invalid: Unjust Enrichment under the RCCA as the Defendant obtained and retained a benefit at the Plaintiff's expense with no legal justification under Fact 3.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $21,207.84 for Breach of Contract for not responding to the Default Notice.
2. In the Alternative where the loan was invalid: $20,000 for Unjust Enrichment as the Defendant obtained and retained a benefit at the Plaintiff's expense with no legal justification of $20,000 as the benefit under Fact 3.
3. 30% of the case value in Legal Fees.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 21st day of October 2026