Lawsuit: Pending Barclays v. Zombie_Bro [2026] DCR 86

00f3

00f3

Citizen
Supporter
00f3
00f3
Attorney
Joined
May 25, 2026
Messages
17

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Barclays
Plaintiff (Represented by 00f3)

v.

Zombie_Bro_

Defendant​
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
Barclays (Plaintiff) entered into a contract with Zombie_Bro_ (Defendant) for a loan of $6,000.00. The loan was to be repaid in 6 payments made once a week of $1,000 plus 2% interest on the principal of $6,000.00. Zombie_bro made no effort to comply with the terms of the loan.
Click to expand...
I. PARTIES
1. Barclays (Plaintiff)
2. Zombie_Bro_ (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. On April 26th, 2026, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff for the Plaintiff to lend the Defendant money.
2. This loan, for the principal of $6,000.00, was to be paid back in 6 payments of $1,000 + 2% interest on the principal, with payments being due once per week. The loan was to be used for investment into the stock referred to as "GOLD". As per the terms of the loan, the stock purchased with the lent money, "GOLD", would be used as collateral on the loan should it default. As outlined in the contract, late payments would incur a fee of $50 per day delinquent, following a 3 day grace period. Upon being 2 weeks delinquent, the loan would be considered in default.
3. The Defendant agreed to these terms and had the capacity to do such.
4. Following his acceptance of the loan, the defendant ceased communication with the Plaintiff regarding the loan.
5. The loan was declared default on May 19th, 2026.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract: The RCCA, under Part VI § 1(a), defines breach of contract as when a person
"fails to perform obligations under a valid and enforceable contract without a lawful excuse."
Click to expand...
The Defendant had agreed to and had the capacity to agree to the terms of the contract. The contract was in no way unlawful or unenforceable. The Defendant did not communicate a lawful excuse for his noncompliance with the terms.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $7,420 in Liquidated Damages, as authorized under the RCCA Part III § 6, for the breach of contract. $7,420 is calculated via the following formula, which was specified within the contract that the Defendant agreed to: $6,000, from the principal of the loan; $720 interest, which is 2% weekly interest on the principal of the loan multiplied by 6 for the 6 week term of the loan; and $700 in late fees, $50 for each day late following a 3 day grace period for the 2 weeks of delinquency prior to the defaulting.
2. In Legal Fees, $3,000 or 30% of the total case value awarded, whichever is greater, as per the RCCA Part III § 7(a) and 7(d).
V. EVIDENCE
P-001
1781057527582.png
P-002
1781057542713.png
P-003
1781057552831.png
P-004
1781057559635.png
P-005
1781057566523.png


1781118910902.png


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 9th day of June 2026

 
Last edited:

Writ of Summons


@Zombie_Bro_ , is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Barclays v. Zombie_Bro [2026] DCR 86

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

Answer to Complaint


In the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont
Answer to Complaint

I. Answer

1. The Defence affirms, that the Plaintiff allegedly lent the Defendant $6,000.00 on or around April 26th, 2026, but denies that the Plaintiff has sufficiently established that a valid and enforceable contract was formed.

2. The Defence affirms, that the alleged loan terms referenced a principal amount of $6,000.00, repayment in six weekly payments, interest, GOLD stock as collateral, late fees, and default after two weeks of delinquency. However, the Defence denies that these terms were sufficiently clear, complete, and enforceable as pleaded by the Plaintiff.

3. The Defence denies, that the Plaintiff has sufficiently proven that the Defendant had legal capacity to enter into the alleged contract at the time of formation.

4. The Defence denies, that the Defendant’s alleged lack of communication, by itself, establishes breach of a valid and enforceable contract.

5. The Defence affirms, that the Plaintiff allegedly declared the loan in default on May 19th, 2026, but do not contest, that the Plaintiff has shown the default declaration was valid, properly calculated, or supported by enforceable contract terms.


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATE: This 22nd June of 2026

 

Motion


In the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont
Motion for Summary Judgement

The Defence respectfully requests Summary Judgement. The Defence only denied irrelevant facts that do not prejudice a fair judgment based on the facts of the case.

DATE: This 23rd June of 2026

 
KeyChunky321 said:

Motion


In the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont
Motion for Summary Judgement

The Defence respectfully requests Summary Judgement. The Defence only denied irrelevant facts that do not prejudice a fair judgment based on the facts of the case.

DATE: This 23rd June of 2026

Click to expand...
The Plaintiff concurs.
 
KeyChunky321 said:

Motion


In the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont
Motion for Summary Judgement

The Defence respectfully requests Summary Judgement. The Defence only denied irrelevant facts that do not prejudice a fair judgment based on the facts of the case.

DATE: This 23rd June of 2026

Click to expand...
Motion for Summary Judgment Granted

This case is in recess pending verdict
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top