Lawsuit: Pending AsexualDinosaur v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 51

asexualdinosaur

asexualdinosaur

Squid Lizard
Public Defender
Education Department
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
Change Maker Staff Popular in the Polls Statesman
AsexualDinosaur
AsexualDinosaur
Public Defender
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Messages
166

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


AsexualDinosaur
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security claimed I had committed a crime in #politics - A few minutes later I was fined $100 by Multiman155.

I opened a ticket with the DHS to dispute this fine, as I do not believe this met the bar for advertising. Being informed that I should take this up with Roryyy_ by Multiman155, I pinged roryyy_ in the channel.

Another employee of the DHS took a look, and I was provided 3 pieces of evidence (two of them the same), one from Secretary Roryyy_ and two from employee Rubilubi55.

It was then clarified by Secretary Roryyy_ that the issue specifically was the image they had posted displaying “Dino for House” in response to a question from Rora_Soul.

The result of this ticket was a denial for my dispute initially by employee Rubilubi55, to which I asked specifically for the Secretary’s input before I put forward a legal appeal, then by employee Lukeyyy7920 (Whom was also not the Secretary or Dep. Secretary), then finally Roryyy_ said they would not be accepting this dispute.



I. PARTIES
1. AsexualDinosaur - Plaintiff
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont - Defendant
4. rora_soul - Witness

II. FACTS
All times and Dates will be in Central Standard Time or CST
1. 7/24/2025 8:36 PM - GraprielJuice says “The WPR is a hivemind” - “We have said this before”
2. 7/24/2025 8:37 PM - Moyfr says “vote casey” - “someone who isnt a hivemind’
3. 7/24/2025 8:45 PM - AsexualDinosaur (plaintiff) says “I for one would vote Dino” - “Maybe even Casey”
4. 7/24/2025 9:01 PM - rora_soul ping replies the plaintiff and says “wait what”
5. 7/24/2025 9:01 PM - AsexualDinosaur (plaintiff) says “Dino for House”
6. 7/24/2025 9:03 PM - rora_soul says “based Dino comeback”
6. 7/25/2025 1:57 AM - roryyy_ ping replies the plaintiff’s “Dino for House” message and says “Illegal Advertising”
7. 7/25/2025 1:57 AM - AsexualDinosaur (plaintiff) says “Not when it’s relevant to the conversation rory smh…”
8. 7/25/2025 2:17 AM - Plaintiff was fined a total of $100 for “Illegal Advertising” by Multiman155
9. 7/25/2025 2.19 AM - Plaintiff opened a ticket with the DHS to dispute this charge.
10. 7/25/2025 2:40 AM - Secretary Roryyy_ provided their screenshot of the offense
11. 7/25/2025 2:41 AM - Rubilubi provided 2 screenshots of the offense
12. 7/25/2025 2:42 AM - Roryyy_ claims “Saying ‘Dino for House’ is advertising a political campaign"
13. 7/25/2025 2:42 AM - AsexualDinosaur (plaintiff) says “They asked me a question” - “It was an answer to their question” - “they pinged me”
14. 7/25/2025 3:10 AM - roryyy_ says “The screenshot saying who you're voting for is irrelevant I sent that one cause Moy has committed illegal advertisment in that one.”
15. 7/25/2025 3:12 AM - AsexualDinosaur (plaintiff) says “So the crime is specifically me answering rora’s question?”
16. 7/25/2025 3:17 AM - roryyy_ says “You saying ‘Dino for House’”
17. The DHS has charged the plaintiff for “Illegal advertising”
18. The DHS applied this charge incorrectly
19. The DHS denied the plaintiff’s appeal in a ticket

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. In being charged for this crime (Fact 8) I was forced to pay a fine of $100- this should be returned.
2. Giving me the run-around, forcing me to take this issue to court to dispute, and the conduct of the other two employees was quite exhausting- this whole situation is quite outrageous.
3. Rory was made aware that these comments were in response to a question and chose not to appeal the charge, this too is outrageous.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Compensatory Damages of $100
2. Punitive Damages of $1000
3. Legal Fees of $2000
4. Removal of the Illegal Advertising Charge

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 25th day of July 2025

 
Last edited:

Writ of Summons


@gribble19 is required to appear before the District Court of Redmont in the case of AsexualDinosaur v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Your honor,

I wish to amend my filing to read `GraprielJuice` instead of `GaprielJuice` for Fact 1.
This was a typo of the persons name and I wish to have it corrected for the record.

Many apologies,
thank you.
 
asexualdinosaur said:
Your honor,

I wish to amend my filing to read `GraprielJuice` instead of `GaprielJuice` for Fact 1.
This was a typo of the persons name and I wish to have it corrected for the record.

Many apologies,
thank you.
Click to expand...
Granted.
 

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

Your Honor,
The Defendant moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. All complaints, even Small Claims, must have details that meet the criteria set out in Rule 2 (Standing); See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 3.1. Defendant notes that the title of this rule specifically refers to "initial" complaints.

2. In order for a Plaintiff to pursue a case, they must show to the court that they suffered some injury caused by a clear second party or that they are affected by an application of law; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 2.1.

3. In order for a Plaintiff fo pursue a case, they must show to the court that the cause of injury was against the law; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 2.1.

4. Plaintiff's Complaint did not include any pieces of evidence. Plaintiff therefore could not possibly have shown anything to the court, as the burden of proof is on the Plaintiff; See Judicial Standards Act, §14.

6. Plaintiff's complaint did not refer to any laws and did not show or even attempt to show how the cause of injury was against the law.

7. A person commits illegal advertising if the person advertises a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising; See Criminal Code Act, Part IX, §11.

8. Plaintiff did not explain or even attempt to explain how the situation that occurred did not involve Plaintiff advertising a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising.

9. Plaintiff furthermore did not allege that they did not advertise a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising.

10. A Motion to dismiss may be submitted if the plaintiff fails to have sufficient standing in order to pursue the case; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 5.12.

 
gribble19 said:

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

Your Honor,
The Defendant moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. All complaints, even Small Claims, must have details that meet the criteria set out in Rule 2 (Standing); See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 3.1. Defendant notes that the title of this rule specifically refers to "initial" complaints.

2. In order for a Plaintiff to pursue a case, they must show to the court that they suffered some injury caused by a clear second party or that they are affected by an application of law; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 2.1.

3. In order for a Plaintiff fo pursue a case, they must show to the court that the cause of injury was against the law; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 2.1.

4. Plaintiff's Complaint did not include any pieces of evidence. Plaintiff therefore could not possibly have shown anything to the court, as the burden of proof is on the Plaintiff; See Judicial Standards Act, §14.

6. Plaintiff's complaint did not refer to any laws and did not show or even attempt to show how the cause of injury was against the law.

7. A person commits illegal advertising if the person advertises a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising; See Criminal Code Act, Part IX, §11.

8. Plaintiff did not explain or even attempt to explain how the situation that occurred did not involve Plaintiff advertising a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising.

9. Plaintiff furthermore did not allege that they did not advertise a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising.

10. A Motion to dismiss may be submitted if the plaintiff fails to have sufficient standing in order to pursue the case; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 5.12.

Click to expand...
Your honor,

Permission to respond to this motion?
 
Your honor,

It's clear as day I must have been affected by an application of a law.
The DHS as part of the executive applied the law in a method to which they saw fit, and this affected me.
The purpose of this case is to determine whether they had correctly applied the law as this is a novel situation.

Further, this is a process of disputing a charge made against me. I would argue that any dispute of a charge inherently has standing by virtue of having been charged, which is verifiable and can be provided during discovery. The DCR is the very court intended to handle criminal disputes, this is written into the constitution.
'The‌ ‌District‌ ‌Court‌ of Redmont ‌hears ‌all‌ ‌minor‌ ‌civil‌ ‌and‌ ‌criminal‌ ‌disputes‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌first‌ ‌instance.‌'

The cause of injury is directly related to the application of the very law I was charged with- and this can be elaborated upon further in opening and closing statements, or pre-trial through discovery and interrogatories


It is not necessary that I provide any evidence in my filing, this is actually what the entire pre-trial section we refer to as discovery is for, and when I intend to submit evidence- I am not contesting the burden of proof, but this is pre-trial and pre-discovery.


It can be very much implied that the plaintiff is disputing their charge, so I fail to understand the defence's perspective when it comes to #9, very clearly the plaintiff is saying - "I don't believe I did this thing I was charged with"


If it is strictly necessary that I link in what ways I was effected- I find it pretty clear that this runs against a
constitutional right or freedom. "Freedom of Political Communication" [PartIV.32.(7)]


I would also note that the ability to amend your complaint is available through discovery.
If there is a necessary change to be made, it may be amended in- a dismissal is not necessary especially at this stage of the case- pre-trial, pre-discovery.


I simply ask that this a motion to dismiss under these rules be delayed until after discovery, prior to opening statements so that the case can be heard justly.



Thank you.
 
gribble19 said:

Motion


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

Your Honor,
The Defendant moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. All complaints, even Small Claims, must have details that meet the criteria set out in Rule 2 (Standing); See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 3.1. Defendant notes that the title of this rule specifically refers to "initial" complaints.

2. In order for a Plaintiff to pursue a case, they must show to the court that they suffered some injury caused by a clear second party or that they are affected by an application of law; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 2.1.

3. In order for a Plaintiff fo pursue a case, they must show to the court that the cause of injury was against the law; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 2.1.

4. Plaintiff's Complaint did not include any pieces of evidence. Plaintiff therefore could not possibly have shown anything to the court, as the burden of proof is on the Plaintiff; See Judicial Standards Act, §14.

6. Plaintiff's complaint did not refer to any laws and did not show or even attempt to show how the cause of injury was against the law.

7. A person commits illegal advertising if the person advertises a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising; See Criminal Code Act, Part IX, §11.

8. Plaintiff did not explain or even attempt to explain how the situation that occurred did not involve Plaintiff advertising a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising.

9. Plaintiff furthermore did not allege that they did not advertise a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising.

10. A Motion to dismiss may be submitted if the plaintiff fails to have sufficient standing in order to pursue the case; See Court Rules and Procedures, Rule 5.12.

Click to expand...
Motion to Dismiss is denied. There is still the entire period of Discovery for plaintiff to provide evidence. I will be happy for you to file another Motion to Dismiss at the end of discovery. For the time being however I do believe that plaintiff's case holds sufficient water to continue.

Furthermore, the Commonwealth has 48 hours to provide an Answer to Complaint.
 
Last edited:

Answer to Complaint


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

AsexualDinosaur
Plaintiff

v.

Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defendant AFFIRMS facts 1 to 9 of Plaintiff's Complaint.
2. The Defendant lacks information or knowledge to form a belief about the truth of facts 10 and 11 of Plaintiff's Complaint, and therefore DENIES this.
3. The Defendant AFFIRMS facts 12 to 17 of Plaintiff's Complaint.
4. The Defendant DENIES fact 18 of Plaintiff's Complaint.
5. The Defendant AFFIRMS fact 19 of Plaintiff's Complaint.

II. DEFENCES
1. A person commits illegal advertising if the person advertises a business or political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising; See Criminal Code Act, Part IX, §11.
2. Plaintiff committed illegal advertising by advertising a political campaign in a public chat not designated for advertising and was correctly charged with the crime, the fine should thus not be returned.
3. The conduct of Defendant's employees in the ticket was respectful and by no means outrageous, unlike Plaintiff's own behavior in the ticket.
4. The law does not state anything about comments in response to a question not being considered as illegal advertising, the decision to not accept the appeal was therefore not at all outrageous.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 25th day of July 2025

 
Thank you for the prompt reply.

We shall now enter Discovery, which shall last 5 days or end sooner if both parties agree to such.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top