Lawsuit: Dismissed Anthony_Org v. Elderdoor696528 [2025] DCR 54

[Muggy21]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Anthony_Org [Represented by RedStar Law]
Plaintiff

v.

Elderdoor696528
Respondent

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

Anthony_Org was constructing on his property when Elderdoor696528 brutally and without warning murdered Anthony_Org. This obstruction prevented the quiet enjoyment of the property by Anthony_Org. Further, the multiple crime scenes delayed construction, causing significant economic damages. This is Anthony_Org's primary method of enjoyment, employment, and sustenance. The delays in construction barred the solicitation of apartments to the public, thus necessitating additional damages.

I. PARTIES
1. Anthony_Org (Plaintiff)
2. Elderdoor696528 (Respondent) -> The Discord of this player is unknown to Plaintiff.

II. FACTS
1. Elderdoor696528 committed murder, as defined under the Violent Offenses Act.
2. Elderdoor696528, viciously and maliciously without prior warning, justification, nor reasonable reliance on self-defense, murdered Anthony_Org.
3. This incident, and its subsequent interference with the property with the multiple crime scenes, disturbed Anthony_Org's ability to earn money.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Elderdoor696528 committed murder, which causes multiple crime scenes, thus impeding construction
2. Elderdoor696528's repeated murders prohibits Anthony_Org obstructed lawful business activity, thus incurring damages under several legal theories, as defined in IV.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $30,000 in Compensatory Damages: Disruption of Quiet Enjoyment, Medical Costs
2. $10,000 in Legal Fees; permissible under the Legal Damages Act.
3. $10,000 in Punitive Damages
4. All other remedies deemed by this Honourable Court as just.

Total: A minimum judgement no less than $50,000.00

EVIDENCE:
1) Plaintiff's Exhibit A
2) Plaintiff's Exhibit B
3) Plaintiff's Exhibit C

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 6th day of August, 2025.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Writ of Summons

@Elderdoor696528 is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Anthony_Org v. Elderdoor696528.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Matthew100x]

Your honor,

I will be representing Elderdoor696528 in this matter.

Yours truly,
Matthew100x
Managing Partner at Prodigium | Attorneys at Law

 

[AmityBlamity]

Your honor,

I will be representing Elderdoor696528 in this matter.

Yours truly,
Matthew100x
Managing Partner at Prodigium | Attorneys at Law

Thank you. You have 48 hours to provide an Answer to Complaint.

 

[Matthew100x]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Anthony_Org [Represented by RedStar Law]
Plaintiff

v.

Elderdoor696528 (Represented by Prodigium | Attorneys at Law)
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. Elderdoor696528 committed murder, as defined under the Violent Offenses Act.

• The defense can neither confirm nor deny that they committed murder as defined under the Violent Offenses Act.

2. Elderdoor696528, viciously and maliciously without prior warning, justification, nor reasonable reliance on self-defense, murdered Anthony_Org.

• The Defendant agrees that they killed the plaintiff. The terms “viciously,” “maliciously without prior warning,” or “justification” are subjective terms.

3. This incident, and its subsequent interference with the property with the multiple crime scenes, disturbed Anthony_Org's ability to earn money.

• The defense can neither confirm nor deny that the Plaintiff’s ability to earn money was disturbed.

II. DEFENCES
1. The law allows for civil suits to seek damages for crimes, although damages are not presumed. The Law regarding legal damages apply to damages caused by crime. The plaintiff has not shown any proof of damages.
a. Compensatory damages require proof of pecuniary loss.
b. The Plaintiff has not shown any proof that the Defendant’s conduct is outrageous.
c. If the Plaintiff does not succeed on any claim, they cannot recover legal fees.
2. According to the common law, the Plaintiff cannot collect a criminal fine for the Defendant’s murder of the plaintiff.
3. The plaintiff lacks standing (see 2.1(1), Information - Court Rules and Procedures)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 8th day of August, 2025.

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
COUNTERCLAIM

Elderdoor696528 (Represented by Prodigium | Attorneys at Law)
Counterplaintiff

v.

Anthony_Org [Represented by RedStar Law]
Counterdefendant


COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
The defense is countersuing due to the frivolous nature of this case. Prodigium is not cheap, and typically charges $5,000 dollars an hour for representation by Matthew100x. We have agreed to represent the Counterplaintiff pro bono. In return, we levy this Counterclaim to deter these kinds of cases and to reward the Attorney for protecting the public.

I. PARTIES
1. Elderdoor696528 (Counterplaintiff “CPlaintiff”)
2. Anthony_Org (Counterdefendant “CDefendant”)

II. FACTS
1. The CDefendant sued the CPlaintiff for murder.
2. The CDefendant gave three videos proving that the CPlaintiff killed the CDefendant.
3. The CDefendant did not submit proof of compensatory loss.
4. The videos regarding the murder did not raise to the level of outrageous behavior.
5. The CDefendant cannot collect damages and thus lack standing. Or, alternatively, the CDefendant will likely have most of their damages reduced due to the lack of proof.
6. Frivolous Court Case is defined as “lodges a legal case that has no serious purpose or value.” (see Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act).
7. According to the Legal Damages act, Punitive Damages can be awarded “as a counter claim if a party believes the case to be frivolous and outrageous.” Punitive Damages will not be awarded unless authorized by statute, which is allowed in this case.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The CDefendant launched a frivolous lawsuit by lodging a legal case with no serious purpose and no serious value.
2. The Legal Damages Act permits punitive damages when a frivolous lawsuit is filed.
3. Alternatively, the CPlaintiff can collect nominal damages if punitive damages cannot be collected.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. $10,000 in Punitive Damages ($7,500 of nominal damages in the alternative)
2. $10,000 in Legal Fees.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 8th day of August, 2025.

 

[Muggy21]

Can opposing counsel clarify if these filings were made in the wrong Court? Both filings are titled returnable to the Federal Court; This is the District Court.

 

[ToadKing]

Your Honour,
MZLD will be taking over this case on behalf of the Plaintiff.

Spoiler: Proof of Representation

 

[ToadKing]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI

The Plaintiff wishes to drop this lawsuit after reaching an out-of-court agreement with the Defendant.

 

[Matthew100x]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI

The CPlaintiff wishes to drop this lawsuit after reaching an out-of-court agreement with the CDefendant.

 

[AmityBlamity]

This case is dismissed with prejudice at the request of the plaintiff.