Adam_The_Warrior
Moderator
Moderator
Health Secretary
Justice Department
State Department
Health Department
Commerce Department
Interior Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
Supporter
Willow Resident
Adam_The_Warrior
electoralofficer
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2023
- Messages
- 101
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
ANDREASP15
Plaintiff (Represented by Dragon Law Firm)
v.
.Thelodgedteam
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
.Thelodgedteam bid on a hat from ANDREASP15 and won against JustaDumpling on his bid on $20,000. However, when it came time to pay .Thelodgedteam failed to deliver on his promise and instead gave my client $20.
I. PARTIES
1. ANDREASP15 (plaintiff)
2. .Thelodgedteam (defendant)
3. JustaDumpling (witness)
II. FACTS
1. On February 2nd, ANDREASP15 auctioned a hat off to .Thelodgedteam for the agreed upon sum of $20k in chat.
2. After .Thelodgedteam won the auction he did not pay the agreed upon amount and instead gave the plaintiff 20 dollars
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. According to the Foundation of Contract Law, in order for a contract to be valid there needs to be an offer, acceptance, and consideration. The offer was extended when .Thelodgedteam said "20k" during the bid, which clearly meant $20,000 in the context of the auction. It is also worth noting that .Thelodgedteam did extend a bill of "$500" previous to the bid of $20k which implies that he meant $20,000. When .Thelodgedteam accepted the hat, but only provided the plaintiff with $20, he violated the terms of the agreement since it was agreed that he would pay $20,000, or $20k, and not $20.
2. By refusing to compensate my client the agreed on $20,000, they were unable to place this money in a financial institution that would earn them interest overtime. The leading interest rate of any bank on DC is 7% at Bob’s Bank. My client could have used the money that is rightfully their own to invest in Bob’s Bank and earned an extra $1,400 on top of the $20,000.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $20,000, the agreed upon amount for the hat.
2. $1,400 in damages. This equates to the amount that my client could have earned after placing the money in Bob’s Bank with their interest rate of 7%.
3. $4280 in legal fees
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 3rd day of February 2024
CIVIL ACTION
ANDREASP15
Plaintiff (Represented by Dragon Law Firm)
v.
.Thelodgedteam
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
.Thelodgedteam bid on a hat from ANDREASP15 and won against JustaDumpling on his bid on $20,000. However, when it came time to pay .Thelodgedteam failed to deliver on his promise and instead gave my client $20.
I. PARTIES
1. ANDREASP15 (plaintiff)
2. .Thelodgedteam (defendant)
3. JustaDumpling (witness)
II. FACTS
1. On February 2nd, ANDREASP15 auctioned a hat off to .Thelodgedteam for the agreed upon sum of $20k in chat.
2. After .Thelodgedteam won the auction he did not pay the agreed upon amount and instead gave the plaintiff 20 dollars
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. According to the Foundation of Contract Law, in order for a contract to be valid there needs to be an offer, acceptance, and consideration. The offer was extended when .Thelodgedteam said "20k" during the bid, which clearly meant $20,000 in the context of the auction. It is also worth noting that .Thelodgedteam did extend a bill of "$500" previous to the bid of $20k which implies that he meant $20,000. When .Thelodgedteam accepted the hat, but only provided the plaintiff with $20, he violated the terms of the agreement since it was agreed that he would pay $20,000, or $20k, and not $20.
2. By refusing to compensate my client the agreed on $20,000, they were unable to place this money in a financial institution that would earn them interest overtime. The leading interest rate of any bank on DC is 7% at Bob’s Bank. My client could have used the money that is rightfully their own to invest in Bob’s Bank and earned an extra $1,400 on top of the $20,000.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $20,000, the agreed upon amount for the hat.
2. $1,400 in damages. This equates to the amount that my client could have earned after placing the money in Bob’s Bank with their interest rate of 7%.
3. $4280 in legal fees
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 3rd day of February 2024
