Lawsuit: Pending Ameslap v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 26

[ameslap]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Ameslap
Plaintiff

v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The President and Vice President have broken their constitutional powers by signing a treaty without the approval of the Senate.

I. PARTIES
1. Ameslap - Plaintiff on behalf of the Citizens of Redmont.
2. The Commonwealth of Redmont - Defendant
3. Technofied - President of Redmont, Chief Executive of Redmont
4. Scassany - Vice President, Treaty Signer.

II. FACTS
1. On April 3, 2026, at 7:21 PM MST, Vice President Scassany announced the signing of a treaty between the Commonwealth of Redmont and the Kingdom of Alexandria.
2. The Constitution gives the President or their delegate the power to sign international treaties "with the simple majority approval of the Senate."
3. The Constitution gives the Senate the sole responsibility of "approving or rejecting, by simple majority, the signing, revocation, or withdrawal from any treaty involving the Commonwealth of Redmont."
4. As of the time of the signing, there was no resolution, motion, or vote to approve the treaty.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. This is a foundational check and balance on power. The Executive Branch has breached its constitutional powers by unilaterally signing and bringing the country into a new agreement.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Reaffirm the constitutional separation of powers when it comes to Redmont's treaties.
2. The SC-DC Treaty is deemed illegal and not valid.


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 8th day of April 2026.