Appeal: Pending [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40

[TheSnowGuardian]

Username: TheSnowGuardian

I am representing a client

Who is your Client?: Talion & Partners INC., Noadenmark

What Case are you Appealing?: [2026] DCR 37

Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - Noadenmark v. Zombie_Bro_ [2026] DCR 37

Basis for Appeal: The Court did not award Plaintiff's counsel legal fees.

According to Part III, Section 7(2)(h)(i), legal fees can only be given up where "communicated" to the Court. Appelant did not communicate so anywhere within the filing or the legal case.

The RCCA clearly dictates legal fees "shall" be awarded 30% of the value of the case to the prevailing party. The Court ruled that the Plaintiff is the prevailing party.

Additionally, the RCCA also clearly dictates that a minimum of 3000$ "shall" be awarded for any case heard by the District Court.

We respectfully request that the Court reverse the Hnble. District Court's judgement in not awarding legal fees and ask that Talion & Partners INC. be awarded 3000$.

Supporting Evidence:

 

[Franciscus]

Writ of Summons

@Zombie_Bro_ is ordered to appear before the Federal Court in the appellate proceeding [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[TheSnowGuardian]

Writ of Summons

@Zombie_Bro_ is ordered to appear before the Federal Court in the appellate proceeding [2026] DCR 37 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 40.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Your Honour, is the Federal Court going to hear this appeal?

 

[Franciscus]

On review of the filings herein by Plaintiff-Appellant, through their learned counsel, the Federal Court accepts the Appeal for review. We have thus issued a summons to the Defendant-Appellee.

 

[Franciscus]

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER — SUMMARY CONVICTION OF CONTEMPT OF COURT

The respondent, Zombie_Bro_, has failed to appear. The Federal Court finds the respondent to have committed Contempt of Court by failing to obey our Writ of Summons. The respondent shall be jailed for 10 minutes.

In the Federal Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER — APPOINTMENT
A GUARDIAN AD LITEM

The Federal Court hereby issues this writ:

Within 72 hours, the Public Defender Program shall assign a public defender to represent the Appellee within this appellate proceeding. Should none be assigned in that time frame, the Court will randomly select a public defender not on leave of absence and assign them to this proceeding.

In the Federal Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155

Court Order

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE — AUTHORIZATION TO REPRESENT CLIENTS

The Federal Court is aware that the appellant has stated that their clients are “Talion & Partners INC.” and “Noadenmark”. Upon review of the filings, the Court does not see material submitted that would provide evidence of authority to represent either of these parties in the instant appellate proceeding.

Before we proceed to a full appellant brief, the Court requires the following:

1. On what basis does Appellant’s Counsel (@TheSnowGuardian) claim authority to represent Talion & Partners INC. in the instant appeal?
2. On what basis does Appellant’s Counsel (@TheSnowGuardian) claim authority to represent Noadenmark in the instant appeal?

TheSnowGuardian is ordered to provide a response to this Order to Show Cause within 48 hours, on pain of contempt.

In the Federal Court,
Hon. Judge Multiman155