Appeal: Denied [2025] FCR 21 - Appeal

Status
Not open for further replies.

gribble19

Citizen
Attorney General
State Department
Homeland Security Department
Justice Department
Commerce Department
Education Department
Supporter
Aventura Resident
Change Maker Popular in the Polls Legal Eagle 5th Anniversary
Gribble19
Gribble19
Attorney General
Joined
Jan 27, 2025
Messages
178


Username: Gribble19

I am representing a client

Who is your Client?: Department of Homeland Security

File(s) attached

What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 21

Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - RaiTheGuy07 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] FCR 21

Basis for Appeal: The verdict in [2025] FCR 21 found RaiTheGuy not guilty of three crimes, overruling a summary criminal judgment. This is very wrong and inappropriate for many reasons.

1. The trial in question was a civil trial and not a criminal trial. Criminal and civil trials have different standards of proof. Criminal verdicts can and should not be given based on a civil trial.

2. The verdict overrules a judgment without being an appellate case of the judgment in question. This goes against all reasonable expectations, as well as against the principle of Res Judicata. Allowing judges to overrule judgements previously made, in cases that are not appellate to those judgements completely destroys the value of verdicts, judgements and our judicial system as a whole.

Supporting Evidence:
 

Attachments

  • por.jpg
    por.jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 10
In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has voted to reject this appeal. The not guilty verdict and expungement were necessary to resolve the wrongful termination claim, given that the legality of the murders directly impacted the arrest and termination. The verdict does not pointlessly overturn a prior verdict but rather interprets the facts to grant the relief sought by the plaintiff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top