Appeal: Denied [2025] DCR 10 - Appeal

[Dartanboy]

Username: Dartanboy

I am representing a client

Who is your Client?: juniperfig

File(s) attached

What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] DCR 10

Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Pending - The Commonwealth of Redmont v. juniperfig [2025] DCR 10

Basis for Appeal: Magistrate Mask3D_WOLF made several procedural errors during this case which warrant it being declared a mistrial, in particular:
1. Despite asking about witnesses during Discovery, neither party asked to summons any witnesses. After Discovery was over, the Prosecution attempted to summon juniperfig as a witness. Initially, the Magistrate ruled that adding a witness after Discovery had already ended was not permitted, however, after Opening Statements, she changed her mind because "we are really making this bland." Yes, the Magistrate chose to unfairly allow the Prosecution to suddenly summon a witness because she felt the case was too boring without a witness.
2. The Magistrate announced a "verdict" in-game which sentenced my client without going over the Prosecution's position, Defendant's position, or Court Opinion, also without providing a written record of the verdict. When confronted with this, the Magistrate simply said the in-game "verdict" was sufficient. My client has been unable to appeal the decision as it is almost entirely undocumented and furthermore, without any reasoning for the verdict it is unappealable, not to mention against the Constitutional right to be informed of the cause and nature of accusations and the right to appeal any charge.

Thus, the case must be declared a mistrial.

Supporting Evidence:

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor, Magistrate Mask3D_WOLF has finally posted a verdict, presumably due to the public pressure created by this appeal and a related petition.

Nonetheless, this appeal is related to court procedure, not the content of the verdict (which was posted  after this appeal was made).

Thus, we still reserve the right to appeal the charge if the case is not declared a mistrial.

 

[ko531]

Verdict

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

Following careful deliberation, the Federal Court has decided to deny this appeal.

The procedure around the summoning of witnesses are not based in law but in Court rules and procedure. Rule 1.3 gives the plaintiff the ability to appeal court rules if the usage does not comply with previous court decisions. While the summoning of the witness in this case may be outside of the written rules, there is precedent that application of such rules are up to the presiding officers discretion like in ko531 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 33.
As for lack of a written verdict. The written verdict was posted in a reasonably timely manner in order to ensure that the plaintiff's rights to be informed of cause and nature of accusations and the ability to appeal remain intacted.

As such, there were no outrageous violations of court procedure that would warrant a mistrial.

Thank you for your patience.

​