ko531
Citizen
Justice
Supporter
			
				
				
	
		
		
			
				
					
						
							
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
			
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
		
		
	
	
			
		
			3rd Anniversary
			
		
	
		
	
						
							
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
			
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
		
		
	
	
			
		
			Change Maker
			
		
	
		
	
						
							
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
			
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
		
		
	
	
			
		
			Popular in the Polls
			
		
	
		
	
						
							
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
			
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
		
		
	
	
			
		
			Legal Eagle
			
		
	
		
	
						
					
				
			
		
	
			
	
	
	
		ko531
        	
        		
            		Justice
        		
			
    		- Joined
 - Jul 8, 2022
 
- Messages
 - 1,972
 
- Thread Author
 - #1
 
Username: ko531
I am representing myself
What Case are you Appealing?: [2024] FCR 99
Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: In Session - AlexanderLove v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 99
Basis for Appeal: I was charged with perjury for a false statement I made. I admitted that the statement was false but in order for it to be perjury it must knowingly be false. I was willing to fall a witness at the time to confirm my side of the story because the statement I made I believed to be the truth therefore it cant be perjury as it wasnt knowingly false
Duke also argued that because the commonwealth knew that it was false it was still perjury as Im representing the commonwealth. People working for the commonwealth may have known the actual truth but Im being charged individually with perjury therefore the decision should only be based on my knowledge and what I believed to be true only.
Supporting Evidence:
				
			I am representing myself
What Case are you Appealing?: [2024] FCR 99
Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: In Session - AlexanderLove v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 99
Basis for Appeal: I was charged with perjury for a false statement I made. I admitted that the statement was false but in order for it to be perjury it must knowingly be false. I was willing to fall a witness at the time to confirm my side of the story because the statement I made I believed to be the truth therefore it cant be perjury as it wasnt knowingly false
Duke also argued that because the commonwealth knew that it was false it was still perjury as Im representing the commonwealth. People working for the commonwealth may have known the actual truth but Im being charged individually with perjury therefore the decision should only be based on my knowledge and what I believed to be true only.
Supporting Evidence: