Lawsuit: Pending 12700k v. Trincus Corp. [2025] DCR 58

[12700k]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

12700k
Plaintiff

v.

Trincus Corp.
Defendant

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

On May 4, 2025, the Plaintiff, 12700k, entered into a stock purchase agreement with Defendant Absinf, for the purchase of 2,500 Class B shares in the Trincus Corp. casino for $50,000, paid via Volt. Absinf, the CEO of the Defendant, promised that Trincus would be listed on The Exchange (TEX) within 2–3 days, later revising the deadline to early June 2025. As compensation for delays, the CEO of the Defendant promised an additional 250 shares (worth $5,000) to be paid to the Plaintiff.

Between May 4 and July 24, 2025, the Plaintiff sought updates from Defendant’s CEO and CTO, Dearev, about the IPO. Defendant’s agents repeatedly delayed and failed to deliver the IPO listing or shares. On July 24, 2025, Defendant’s CEO admitted he does not know where the funds are and invited me to "sue" him.

I. PARTIES
1. 12700k - Plaintiff
2. Trincus Corp. - Defendant
3. Absinf - CEO of Trincus Corp.

II. FACTS
1. On May 4, 2025, I paid $50,000 to Trincus Corp.’s Volt bank account for 2,500 Class B shares in Trincus, as per a signed agreement (See: P-001, P-002)
2. Defendant promised an IPO on The Exchange in 2–3 days, later revised to early June 2025.
3. Defendant promised 250 additional shares ($5,000 value) as compensation for delays (See: P-003).
4. From May 4 to May 20, 2025, Defendant and his CTO gave inconsistent updates and excuses for the IPO delay.
5. As of July 24, 2025, no IPO listing or shares have been delivered.
6. Defendant admitted in a Discord message that he does not know where the funds are and told me to sue him or request a deduction from his balance (P-004).

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract: Defendant received $55,000 but failed to deliver shares or IPO listing.
2. Fraudulent Misrepresentation: Defendant knowingly made false promises to induce payment.
3. Unjust Enrichment: Defendant unfairly retains funds without providing agreed consideration.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. Compensatory damages of $55,000.
2. Punitive damages of $20,000 to deter future misconduct.
3. Legal fees amounting to 30% of the case value.

V. WITNESSES
1. Dearev – CTO of Trincus, witness to communications and delays

VI. EXHIBITS

Spoiler: P-001: Stock Purchase Agreement signed May 4, 2025

Stock Purchase Agreement

Spoiler: P-002: Proof of $50,000 payment via Volt & Screenshots of TEX IPO promises

P-002: Proof of $50,000 payment via Volt & Screenshots of TEX IPO promises

Spoiler: P-003: Screenshot of additional 250 shares promise

P-003: Screenshot of additional 250 shares promise

Spoiler: P-004: Screenshot of Defendant admitting unknown funds and telling Plaintiff to sue

P-004: Screenshot of Defendant admitting unknown funds and telling Plaintiff to sue

Spoiler: P-005

TRINCUS - Tickets - ticket-7 [1368456246730031146].txt

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 11th day of August, 2025

 

[AmityBlamity]

Writ of Summons

@AbsInfIsHere is required to appear before the District Court of Redmont in the case of 12700k v. Trincus Corp.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[12700k]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH
MOTION TO AMEND
​

Your Honor,
The plaintiff requests to amend the original case filing in the following way:

The red colored text represents the removed text and the green colored text represents the added text

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract: Defendant received $55,000 but failed to deliver shares or IPO listing.
2. Fraudulent Misrepresentation: Defendant knowingly made false promises to induce payment.
3. Unjust Enrichment: Defendant unfairly retains funds without providing agreed consideration.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract: Defendant received $50,000 but failed to deliver the purchased shares nor the extra $5,000 worth of gifted shares that were promised.
2. Fraudulent Misrepresentation: Defendant knowingly made false promises to induce payment.
3. Unjust Enrichment: Defendant unfairly retains funds without providing agreed consideration.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH
MOTION TO AMEND
​

Your Honor,
The plaintiff requests to amend the original case filing in the following way:

The red colored text represents the removed text and the green colored text represents the added text

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract: Defendant received $55,000 but failed to deliver shares or IPO listing.
2. Fraudulent Misrepresentation: Defendant knowingly made false promises to induce payment.
3. Unjust Enrichment: Defendant unfairly retains funds without providing agreed consideration.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract: Defendant received $50,000 but failed to deliver the purchased shares nor the extra $5,000 worth of gifted shares that were promised.
2. Fraudulent Misrepresentation: Defendant knowingly made false promises to induce payment.
3. Unjust Enrichment: Defendant unfairly retains funds without providing agreed consideration.

Motion to Amend is granted.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Absinf has failed to appear. @12700k, do you wish for the case to proceed to Default Judgement?

 

[12700k]

Motion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT
​

Your honor,
The defendant was given a full 72 hours to appear in front of the courts and has failed to do so. Therefore, the plaintiff requests a default judgement based on the already known facts of the case.

 

[12700k]

Absinf has failed to appear. @12700k, do you wish for the case to proceed to Default Judgement?

Sorry your honor, I posted the motion before I saw this.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Motion for default judgement is granted. Court is in recess pending verdict.

 

[AmityBlamity]

Verdict

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
VERDICT

12700k v. Trincus Corp. [2025] DCR 58

I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION
1. The Plaintiff entered into a contract with Trincus Corp, paying $50,000 in exchange for shares.
2. Trincus Corp failed to deliver the shares as outlined in their contract.

II. DEFENDANT’S POSITION
1. The Defendant failed to appear.

III. THE COURT’S OPINION
First, the court must determine whether or not a contract was in place between both plaintiff and defendant. As per the Contracts Act, contracts need 5 elements to be legally binding: Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, Intent and Capacity.

• Offer: Defendant offered plaintiff shares in exchange for payment.
• Acceptance: Plaintiff signed the contract.
• Consideration: Plaintiff paid cash for shares.
• Intent: Both parties demonstrated a clear willingness to enter a contract.
• Capacity: Both parties possessed the necessary playtime to enter a contract.

We can thus confirm that a contract had been established between the parties. Likewise, while not written down as per the Stock Purchase Agreement, I believe the conditions for a second contract between plaintiff and defendant were met regarding the offer of bonus shares.

The evidence is clear that while the plaintiff upheld their end of the bargain, the defendant failed to uphold theirs. The defendant failed on numerous occasions to transfer the shares, breaching the terms of the contract. Due to the amount of the money unfairly retained by the defendant, as well as the defendant’s outrageous behavior in taking no visible effort to remedy the situation, I also find the full punitive damages to be warranted.

IV. DECISION
The District Court hereby rules in favor of the Plaintiff.

The DHS is hereby ordered to fine Trincus Corp $97,500, and to unfine 12700k the same amount.

The District Court thanks all parties involved. Court is now adjourned.

Signed,
Magistrate AmityBlamity