Lawsuit: Pending 12700k v. ToadKing__

12700k

Citizen
Supporter
Aventura Resident
Homeland Security Department
Construction & Transport Department
5th Anniversary Grave Digger Change Maker Popular in the Polls
12700k
12700k
Detective
Joined
Nov 2, 2021
Messages
383

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


12700k
Plaintiff

v.

ToadKing__
Defendant

COMPLAINT

The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the relevant date, the Plaintiff logged onto the server with the lawful and constitutionally protected intent of casting a ballot in the presidential election of the Commonwealth of Redmont. Upon approaching the designated polling lectern, the Plaintiff was confronted with a small, green entity positioned directly atop the apparatus used for voting. This entity was later identified as the Defendant, who had elected to physically occupy the precise location where ballots are to be cast. The Plaintiff reasonably recoiled in shock, confusion, and alarm, as the act of voting for the highest executive office in the Commonwealth is not customarily conducted under direct observation by an amphibian-adjacent figure.

The Defendant’s presence created an intimidating, irregular, and constitutionally defective voting environment, effectively forcing the Plaintiff to choose between abandoning the vote or proceeding under compromised conditions. The Plaintiff, being aware of their constitutional rights and the fundamental requirement that elections be conducted freely, securely, and without intimidation or obstruction, declined to cast a ballot under such circumstances. The Defendant’s conduct unlawfully interfered with the electoral process by creating an atmosphere of implied surveillance, intimidation, and coercion, thereby violating the Plaintiff’s rights to personal liberty, security, equal participation in the democratic process, and a secret ballot.

I. PARTIES
1. 12700k - Plaintiff
2. ToadKing__ - Defendant

II. FACTS
1. On or around the 7th of February, 2026, at or around 8:20 PM (EST), polling for the February 2026 Presidential elections opened (See: P-002).
2. On or around the 8th of February, 2026, at or around 12:35 AM (EST), Defendant was seen sitting atop the apparatus used for voting (See: P-001).

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Violation of the Right to Secret Ballot:
The action of the Defendant sitting atop the apparatus used for voting, infringes on the voters’ constitutional right to a secret ballot, as guaranteed under Part IV, §32, Point III of the Constitution. This right ensures that individuals can cast their votes without fear, intimidation, or undue influence. The Defendant’s implication of surveillance undermines this fundamental guarantee.
2. Unequal Protection and Discrimination:
Under Part IV, §32, Point XIII, the Constitution guarantees equal protection and benefit of the law to all citizens without unfair discrimination. The Defendant’s presence creates a hostile environment that disproportionately affects newer or less experienced voters, discouraging them from participating fully and equally in the democratic process.
3. Intimidation and Violation of Security Rights:
The Constitution, under Part IV, §32, Point XIV, guarantees the right to liberty and security of the person. The Defendant’s implied surveillance creates an intimidating and oppressive environment, deterring individuals from voting freely and securely. This violates the principles of democratic freedom and personal security inherent in the electoral process.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $20,000 in punitive damages to penalize the Defendant for violating 3 of the Plaintiff’s Constitutional Rights.
2. $6,000 in legal fees, as defined in the Legal Damages Act, $6,000 is the minimum amount of legal fees permitted to be awarded to a Plaintiff in the Federal Court of the Commonwealth.

V. EVIDENCE

P-001.png

P-002.png

VI. WITTNESSES
1. Scassany

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 8th day of February 2026

WORKS CITED:
DCR 11 [2025] - used as inspiration for Part III of the complaint.

 
Back
Top