Lawsuit: Pending 12700k v. MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 89

[Dartanboy]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


12700k (Justice Compass, Ltd. representing)
Plaintiff

v.

MattTheSavvy
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Defendant entered into a loan agreement with the Plaintiff, and failed to make even a single payment.

I. PARTIES
1. 12700k (Plaintiff)
2. MattTheSavvy (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. On August 12, Defendant entered into a loan agreement contract with the Plaintiff [Exhibit P-001].
2. This agreement loaned the Defendant $185,000 [Exhibit P-002].
3. This agreement required $12,500 payments every week until $250,000 had been paid off [Exhibit P-002].
4. This agreement set the plots S104 and C745 as collateral for the loan [Exhibit P-002].
5. This agreement allowed legal action to repossess the plots and recover the balance owed if a payment was more than 2 days late [Exhibit P-002].
6. The Defendant has become non-responsive without paying the first $12,500 payment [Exhibit P-003].

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The plot S104
2. The plot C745
3. $250,000 in Compensatory Damages for the money not paid back from the contract.
4. $75,000 (30% of just the monetary damages) in Legal Fees, payable to the in-game business JusticeCompass or to the player Dartanboy, per the Legal Damages Act.
5. The evictions of S104 and C745 be nullified as it is impossible to remedy them without in-game ownership of the plots. If the DCT still believes they are non-compliant, they should have to file new evictions against my client.

EVIDENCE

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

Exhibit P-002: LOAN AGREEMENT

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 24th day of August 2025.

 

[Dartanboy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

S104 is currently under an eviction notice. We request the eviction be halted so that no additional harm comes to others or the Plaintiff when the plot is transferred back to the Plaintiff in accordance with the terms of the contract in this case.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor, I forgot to include consent to represent. Here it is:

Spoiler: Consent

 

[ko531]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

S104 is currently under an eviction notice. We request the eviction be halted so that no additional harm comes to others or the Plaintiff when the plot is transferred back to the Plaintiff in accordance with the terms of the contract in this case.

Emergency Injunction Granted. The eviction of S104 will be halted until the end of this case.

Summons will be issued shortly

 

[ko531]

Writ of Summons

@MattTheSavvy is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of 12700k v.. MattThesavvy [2025] FCR 89

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Dartanboy]

Emergency Injunction Granted. The eviction of S104 will be halted until the end of this case.

Summons will be issued shortly

Motion

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your honor, we request the issuance of a second Emergency Injunction as C745 has also been reported for eviction - could this eviction be halted as well?

Thank you.

 

[ko531]

Motion

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your honor, we request the issuance of a second Emergency Injunction as C745 has also been reported for eviction - could this eviction be halted as well?

Thank you.

Granted. The eviction of C745 will be halted

 

[Dartanboy]

Motion

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your honor,

72 hours have elapsed with no response. We request a default judgement.

 

[ko531]

Motion

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your honor,

72 hours have elapsed with no response. We request a default judgement.

Motion for Default Judgement Denied.

A public defender will be assigned shortly.

 

[12700k]

Motion for Default Judgement Denied.

A public defender will be assigned shortly.

Your honor, the Plaintiff has the constitutional right to a speedy trial and the PDD has had more than 48 hours to present themselves to the court.

 

[ko531]

Your honor, the Plaintiff has the constitutional right to a speedy trial and the PDD has had more than 48 hours to present themselves to the court.

Your right to a speedy trial does not trump the defendants right to representation. So far there have been no unnecessary delays to your right to a speedy trial is intact.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

Your honour,

I am present as the Public Defender Director - I have assigned @Superwoops to this case.

 

[Superwoops]

Your honour, I can confirm I will be taking this case as PD.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor,

The Defendant's counsel appeared 4 days ago.

We believe it would be prudent to continue the case.

 

[ameslap]

This case is on hold until we determine a presiding officer following the resignation of Ko.

To keep things decently moving forward, @Superwoops you have 72 hours to post your answer to the complaint.

 

[Superwoops]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

12700k (Justice Compass, Ltd. representing)
Plaintiff

v.

MattTheSavvy
Defendant

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The Defense AFFIRMS that on August 12, Defendant entered into a loan agreement contract with the Plaintiff [Exhibit P-001].
2. The Defense NEITHER DENIES NOR AFFIRMS that this agreement loaned the Defendant $185,000 [Exhibit P-002].
3. The Defense NEITHER DENIES NOR AFFIRMS that this agreement required $12,500 payments every week until $250,000 had been paid off [Exhibit P-002].
4. The Defense NEITHER DENIES NOR AFFIRMS that this agreement set the plots S104 and C745 as collateral for the loan [Exhibit P-002].
5. The Defense NEITHER DENIES NOR AFFIRMS that this agreement allowed legal action to repossess the plots and recover the balance owed if a payment was more than 2 days late [Exhibit P-002].
6. The Defense NEITHER DENIES NOR AFFIRMS that the Defendant has become non-responsive without paying the first $12,500 payment [Exhibit P-003].

II. DEFENCES

It is simply not possible as of yet to confirm that the terms that my client agreed to on August 12th are the same terms put forward in P-002. Yes, the document holds the same name, however upon clicking on the link shown in P-001, it leads to a non-existent file (D-001). This raises significant suspicion and makes it so the court cannot wholeheartedly believe that my client agreed to facts 2 though 6.

If one is to assume that P-002 is the full terms that my client agreed to, though, then the Plaintiff is trying to "double dip" and attempt to take more than what they deserve by trying to seize the collateral plots (which would cover a portion of the $250,000 through their worth) as well as the full $250,000 in cash from my client, which is unreasonable. Collateral only serves as a guarantee on the full amount, that being the alleged $250,000 in this case.


III. EVIDENCE

Spoiler: D-001

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 17th day of September, 2025.

 

[Dartanboy]

If one is to assume that P-002 is the full terms that my client agreed to, though, then the Plaintiff is trying to "double dip" and attempt to take more than what they deserve by trying to seize the collateral plots (which would cover a portion of the $250,000 through their worth) as well as the full $250,000 in cash from my client, which is unreasonable. Collateral only serves as a guarantee on the full amount, that being the alleged $250,000 in this case.

Objection

PERJURY

Superwoops claims they are unable to view the contract, yet also (falsely) asserts the terms of the contract. Both of these cannot be true, and therefore he has perjured in this court.

 

[Superwoops]

Objection

PERJURY

Superwoops claims they are unable to view the contract, yet also (falsely) asserts the terms of the contract. Both of these cannot be true, and therefore he has perjured in this court.

Your honour,
claimed I am unable to access the file sent to my client in P-001 only (done by screenshotting and clicking copy on Mac), not P-002.
The rest of my argument is supposing that P-001 did lead to the same contract as P-002, which could very well be but is yet to be proven. However that argument still stands in the case that my client signed P-002 (which is what I am asserting in that case).
These two are not mutually exclusive and so I have not perjured myself.

 

[ameslap]

I am overseeing this case.

Objection

PERJURY

Superwoops claims they are unable to view the contract, yet also (falsely) asserts the terms of the contract. Both of these cannot be true, and therefore he has perjured in this court.

Your honour,
claimed I am unable to access the file sent to my client in P-001 only (done by screenshotting and clicking copy on Mac), not P-002.
The rest of my argument is supposing that P-001 did lead to the same contract as P-002, which could very well be but is yet to be proven. However that argument still stands in the case that my client signed P-002 (which is what I am asserting in that case).
These two are not mutually exclusive and so I have not perjured myself.

Objection denied. I believe this is an issue with the Mac photo-link feature and not the fault of Counsel.

I will say that this court agrees that the document shown in P-001 and the document that is linked in P-002 are indeed the same. They share a name and URL (I just typed them out side by side, the only difference is one is for a view/edit mode and the other is for what I would assume to be a private link).

We will now enter discovery for 5 days, if you would like to end/extend discovery, please let the court know.

Before discovery ends: Both Parties are required to state if they would like an in-game trial or not.
this judge believes we should do more but thats not up to me...

 

[Dartanboy]

The Plaintiff is willing to participate in an in-game trial.

 

[Superwoops]

An in-game trial would be very interesting. I accept.

Additionally, we would like to request a 2-day discovery extension while the Defense gathers important information from a third party.

 

[Dartanboy]

Your honor, the Plaintiff agrees with the extension for different reasons.

 

[Dartanboy]

The Plaintiff submits the following evidence:

Spoiler: Exhibit P-004

https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/s104-sep-28-2025.31649/

Spoiler: Exhibit P-005

 

[Dartanboy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND

The Plaintiff moves to make the following amendment to the complaint:
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. The plot S104
2. The plot C745
3. $250,000 in Compensatory Damages for the money not paid back from the contract.
4. $75,000 (30% of just the monetary damages) in Legal Fees, payable to the in-game business JusticeCompass or to the player Dartanboy, per the Legal Damages Act.
5. The evictions of S104 and C745 be nullified as it is impossible to remedy them without in-game ownership of the plots. If the DCT still believes they are non-compliant, they should have to file new evictions against my client.

 

[Superwoops]

The Defense submits the following evidence:

Spoiler: D-002

 

[ameslap]

An in-game trial would be very interesting. I accept.

Additionally, we would like to request a 2-day discovery extension while the Defense gathers important information from a third party.

Your honor, the Plaintiff agrees with the extension for different reasons.

Here is how we are going to do things:
1. Discovery is extended 72 hours from now;
2. In the meantime I will open a ticket in the Judiciary Discord, please make sure you are there so we can figure out when to do the in-game trial.
3. This will also provide you enough time to get your opening statements (and make sure all evidence is correct and submitted) in order, as the in-game trial shall be pretty quick with only a small break for writing closing statements.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND

The Plaintiff moves to make the following amendment to the complaint:
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1. The plot S104
2. The plot C745
3. $250,000 in Compensatory Damages for the money not paid back from the contract.
4. $75,000 (30% of just the monetary damages) in Legal Fees, payable to the in-game business JusticeCompass or to the player Dartanboy, per the Legal Damages Act.
5. The evictions of S104 and C745 be nullified as it is impossible to remedy them without in-game ownership of the plots. If the DCT still believes they are non-compliant, they should have to file new evictions against my client.

Granted, please amend.