Search results

We grant this extension. The new deadline will be Saturday, November 1st, at 8:46 PM EST.

Just as an update: The verdict for this case is in the process of being written. We hope to publish within a week or so.

The Commonwealth (@Kaiserin_) has seventy-two hours to file their opening statement.

At this time, the Plaintiff (@ToadKing) shall have seventy-two hours to file an opening statement.

"Material" as written within rule 4.2 refers to facts, evidence, and testimony generally. Statutes, the Constitution, rulings by sitting judicial officers, and the law generally exist in the realm of public knowledge and therefore do not need to be affirmatively presented during discovery before...

What relevancy does asking about closing statements have to the context of the trial we are currently in? This seems irrelevant, and an attempt to summon from us a dispositive ruling on an issue that is not before this court.

The parties (@ToadKing & @Kaiserin_) shall have forty-eight hours of discovery.

You shall have forty-eight hours to present your Answer to the Complaint.

@Attorney General's Office is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 18. In a 2-0 vote, Supreme Court will not be granting an emergency injunction. As discussed in the dissenting opinion in zLost v. Commonwealth of Redmont...

Associate Justice Smallfries4 writes the unanimous opinion of the court, joined by Chief Justice Aladeen22. Associate Justice Matthew100x did not take part in discussion or voting. Appellant gribble19 appeals her conviction of perjury before the Federal Court of Redmont. In single issue...

This appeal is now in recess pending verdict.

Appellant @End

It was intended that you would be appellee, the Commonwealth was called in error. Thank you for pointing out this flaw. In addition, in a 2-0 vote the Supreme Court has decided that there will not be an appellee for this issue. Though legally permissible, we believe it better to treat this...

Appellee @Franciscus (or rather, the Government generally @Attorney General's Office) has seventy-two hours to post their appellee brief. Please see this post for more information of what a brief is.

In turn: Due to the lengthy delay in response, the appellant will have until 1:43 PM EST, October 13, 2025, to post their brief. This is sixty-four hours from now, representing the initial seventy-two hours allotted minus the roughly eight hours between the court's response and the...

In a 2-0 vote, the Supreme Court dismisses this case sua sponte for lack of standing under rule 2.1(3). The only standing the Plaintiff alleges before the Supreme Court is through the removal of office of Representative Imza. This is a remedy available in very few circumstances—only through...

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to grant this appeal. The Appellant, @gribble19 (attorney @Matthew100x ) has seventy-two hours to post their Appellant Brief.

MOTION TO RECONSIDER - VOLUNTARY RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SMALLFRIES4 I am moved by Appellant's arguments and sympathetic to their concerns. It is highly unfortunate that each of the three individuals who sat on this three-person bench believed they had a duty to recuse from this case, and its...

Present. I have none.

In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court dismisses this case sua sponte for lack of standing. The Plainitff lacks standing to argue before this court under Rule 2.1(3). The removal of officials may only be sought in a criminal trial or when it is alleged that the official obtained their office...