Search results

OVERRULED in part. @TheSnowGuardian The Court finds you in Contempt for failing to provide a brief in time. I've already given you and your client additional time. You filed a motion within that frame without asking for an extension; I would happily grant an extension prior to a deadline for...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order to Show Cause - Sua Sponte Dismissal under Rule 2.1 Pursuant to Rule 2.2, the Court reviews the Complaint de novo and determines a possible deficiency, to which the Plaintiff is ordered to show cause. Under the Regulations of the...

Will do, but since EmmDubz is busier and to be fair, I'm going to still have it as a Closing Statement. If I rule in his favour, then we'd go there anyways. All deadlines for Closing previously posted are removed. The Court will issue an OSC.

Seeing no objections or motions, the Court is in recess pending verdict.

The Court administratively ignores this motion without any consideration of the arguments therein. The Motion to Strike as filed by Defendant is improper in form. Appeals are adjudicated via the submission of briefs, attempting to challenge a brief with a motion is improper and not acceptable...

Witness Questioning is now over. @Dogeington You have 72 Hours to present a Closing Statement, after which @EmmDubz you have 72 Hours to present a Closing Statement. Extensions will be granted within your timeframe, generally.

The Court will show leniency. I strongly recommend reviewing case law regarding the application of constitutional rights and what other avenues those similarly situated may use instead of a suit. Case dismissed with prejudice, no fines levied nor finding of frivolity.

@Kaiserin_

SUSTAINED and Granted. @ToadKing Get off my docket until summoned. You're getting the courtroom wet with the cloud.

DENIED. You're under order of this Court to show cause as to why this filing isn't frivolous.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order to Show Cause - Sua Sponte Dismissal of Charges 1-3 Upon review of the record, the Court has identified substantial concerns regarding the legal sufficiency of Counts 1 through 3. The Court hereby orders the Prosecution to show cause...

@EmmDubz Any additional questions on cross-examination? I'll put a timer of generally 24 Hours.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order to Show Cause - Consideration of Sua Sponte Dismissal @12700k In our democratic society, our Constitution is the penultimate legal document, dictating the limitations of government and its structure. In a proceeding of a different...

Sustained, Q1 Rookeblue on Cross is struck.

I also RP'd a pdf of it too. The forum post (the" [/verdict/]" one is controlling over all iterations.)[/verdict]

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76 SUMMARY OF CONTROVERSY Plaintiff approaches seeking equitable relief arising from the allegedly premature eviction of multiple plots owned by Plaintiff for inactivity. Plaintiff...

The Verdict in this case has been delivered via 3 Minecraft Books to Parties. After some formatting and minor edits, the Verdict will be released on here. 189 Days...

@Atomicredstoner, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

No, only your appearance is necessary. You have 72 Hours to present an Opposing Brief. Plaintiff's brief is considered his Appellant Brief.

The Federal Court administratively dismisses the action.