Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION kailabeann (The Lovely Law Firm representing) Plaintiff v. Yeet63638 Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. LukaSerdjo (Lovely Law Firm Representing) 2. Yeet63638 II...

The Defendants have agreed, Your Honour.

We would like to call Rurge and AlexTheLillion as witnesses,

Since we would have identical motions to dismiss for some of the other cases, I have included all the relevant defendants here in the interests of brevity. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS Commonwealth of Redmont Plaintiff v. Rurge, Firestar305...

terry crews no longer requires our representation.

Consent for representation by Freeze29

All our clients plead not guilty. We’re still waiting on Freeze29 to provide his proof.

I should clarify AlexTheLilion should’ve been included in the list of our clients, and that the additional time is required partly to get proof of consent to representation.

To clarify, we may employ different legal strategies for different individuals.

Thank you, Your Honour.

Your Honour, I believe the Defendants time has expired?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Katkoo Plaintiff v. JohnWarosa Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Katkoo (Plaintiff) 2. JohnWarosa (Defendant) II. FACTS 1. The defendant, JohnWarosa, illegally...

See here for evidence

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Katkoo Plaintiff v. JohnWarosa Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Katkoo (Plaintiff) 2. JohnWarosa (Defendant) II. FACTS 1. The defendant, JohnWarosa, illegally...

Evidence Consent to Representaion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION VerySmolBirb Plaintiff v. JohnWarosa Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. VerySmolBirb 2. JohnWarosa II. FACTS 1. The defendant...

Sorry about the early closing statement. I didn’t see the follow up question from dygyee since the second page didn’t load properly for me. I repeat the same here. In this case, you have heard about what our client believed, what LazyTitan believed and their ability to work on the plot. We can...

In this case, you have heard about what our client believed, what LazyTitan believed and their ability to work on the plot. We can strip this all away and focus on one simple issue. Have all the criteria for a valid contract been met for each of the various “mini” contracts that the Plaintiff...

I am going to have to decline.

No procedure I am aware of establishes this, and the reason that we have changed our decision on whether our client should testify is he is more comfortable with discussing his personal situation. Regardless, the Plaintiff will still have a chance to cross-examine.