Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. CarterFigueroa [2026] FCR 54

Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TheSnowGuardian

Citizen
Justice Department
Commerce Department
6th Anniversary Change Maker Contemptable
TheSnowGuardian
TheSnowGuardian
State Prosecutor
Joined
Jan 16, 2026
Messages
348

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

CarterFigueroa
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont
2. CarterFigueroa
3. Department of Education

II. FACTS
1. On May 26, 2026, CarterFigueroa, the Defendant, filed a lawsuit in the District Court. (P-003)
2. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the Defendant did not hold any legal qualifications. (P-001)
3. The Defendant has never held a legal qualification.
4. The Defendant represented someone other than themself in the lawsuit. (P-003)
5. The Defendant, as of June 17, 2026, 05:41 GMT, did not hold a valid legal qualification. (P-002)
6. According to Part VII, §1(d) of the Redmont Bar Association Act, the Department of Education is required to hold a record of all qualified legal practitioners.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. Legal Qualification Fraud
Part III, §12(a) of the Criminal Code Act (CCA) specifies the offence to be committed where a person “engages in the practice of law without a valid legal qualification.”

The Defendant does not have a valid legal qualification (Mentioned supra in facts 2, 3, 5) and therefore has committed an offence under this section by engaging in the practice of law without a legal qualification.

2. Legal Malpractice
Part III, §13(a) of the CCA specifies that the offence is committed where a person “files cases in courts beyond their qualification rank or specialised jurisdiction”.

As the Defendant never held a legal qualification, they filed a case beyond their rank, which was none, and has thus committed an offence under this section. (Mentioned supra in facts 2, 3, 5).

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. For the charge of Legal Qualification Fraud, 300 Penalty Units and 4 months disbarment.
2. For the charge of Legal Malpractice, 300 Penalty Units and 4 months disbarment.

1781868019429.png

1781868028773.png

1781868038259.png

Lawsuit: Dismissed - CarterFigueroa, Aridabest2013, thatsaimbot vs Oliwag1 | DemocracyCraft

By making this submission, I agree that I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

Signed,
TheSnowGuardian
Prosecutor

DATED: This 19th day of June 2026

 

Writ of Summons


@CarterFigueroa , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Carterfigueroa [2026] FCR 54

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
Your Honor,

I am present on behalf of the Defendant as their appointed legal representative.

1782144272781.png
(Edited to include proof of representation as it refused to attach the file when I first sent it)
 
CreeperTD said:
Your Honor,

I am present on behalf of the Defendant as their appointed legal representative.

View attachment 87255
(Edited to include proof of representation as it refused to attach the file when I first sent it)
Click to expand...
you have 48 hours to provide an answer to complaint
 

Plea


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

CarterFigueroa (represented by CreeperTD of Theory, Talion, & Partners Inc.)
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. The Defendant pleads GUILTY to all charges.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 24th day of June 2026.

 
Your Honour, the Commonwealth, upon reaching a plea deal with the Defendant reccommends a sentencing of 200 Penalty Units and 2 months disbarrment for each charge, totalling up to 400 Penalty Units and 4 months disbarrment for both charges.
 
TheSnowGuardian said:
Your Honour, the Commonwealth, upon reaching a plea deal with the Defendant reccommends a sentencing of 200 Penalty Units and 2 months disbarrment for each charge, totalling up to 400 Penalty Units and 4 months disbarrment for both charges.
Click to expand...
The Defense confirms this.
 
TheSnowGuardian said:
Your Honour, the Commonwealth, upon reaching a plea deal with the Defendant reccommends a sentencing of 200 Penalty Units and 2 months disbarrment for each charge, totalling up to 400 Penalty Units and 4 months disbarrment for both charges.
Click to expand...
The court accepts this plea deal, and therefore, the case is dismissed. DHS may action this deal
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top