Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Defendant requests the Plaintiff to produce the following materials relevant to the case:
1. All communications between the Plaintiff and the Department of Commerce regarding any investigation into the allegations...
Your Honour,
Respectfully, the intent of the Motion to Compel was for this Court to issue a warrant/order for Staff to produce these logs, consistent with the actions of Magistrate Vennefly in [2025] DCR 98, as well as the Honourable Judge Mug in [2026] FCR 5. The Defendant sees no conceivable...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Maxib02
Plaintiff
v.
FTLCEO
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. DENY. The Defendant was not the owner of the news company "Palantir News" at any time.
2. DENY. The Defendant never acquired "Palantir News" from Aesyr_ or...
Your Honour,
When might the Plaintiff see a verdict in this case?
In two other Federal Court cases involving a permanently deported individual, this Court delivered a verdict the same day. See Fish's Financial LLC v. .AstuteSundew823 [2025] FCR 122 and Volt Bank, Inc. v. .AstuteSundew823...
No objection. However, the Plaintiff would fail to see the purpose of a warrant that would only ascertain the same information produced in [2025] DCR 98.
Furthermore, the "current owner" of the Discord in question may well have changed since the alleged actions. Unless a definitive history of...
Your Honour,
The Defendant's initial two grounds for dismissal in Section 1, fail for several reasons:
1. The Defendant has been judicially identified as the owner/operator of Anchor Watch in three separate proceedings:
ToadKing v. Anchor Watch [2025] DCR 98 - "the Owner/Operator of Anchor...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA
Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
Sofia2750
Defendant
I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. Defendant pleads NO CONTEST to the charge of Harassment of a Polling Place.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
Your Honour,
Consistent with Judge Ameslap's ruling in GER v. DCT [2025] FCR 78, where an amicus brief was denied because the requester was a named witness.
And Your Honour's ruling on an objection covering...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.