Recent content by ToadKing

I. PURPOSE OF THIS BRIEF This brief is submitted to assist the Court in considering the requirements established under the Modern Legal Reform Act regarding specialisation qualifications for filing cases in the Federal Court. II. RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK The Modern Legal Reform Act Section 3(3)...

Your honour, I wish to file an amicus brief regarding the rights under the Modern Legal Reform Act to file cases in the FCR without the correct specialisations.

Username: ToadKing I am representing myself What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] DCR 87 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Pending - ToadKing v. Sofia2750, EATB, RealImza, and RaiTheGuy07 [2025] DCR 87 Basis for Appeal: The DCR committed a reversible legal error by misinterpreting its own...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION ToadKing Plaintiff v. Sofia2750, EATB, RealImza, and RaiTheGuy07 Defendants COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. ToadKing 2. Sofia2750 3...

Before addressing the merits, I want to acknowledge and thank this Court for its thoughtful clarification regarding Rule 4.2 and the citation of case precedent. I understand the Court's guidance that while case law exists in the realm of public knowledge and need not be disclosed during...

Merry Christmas Torten, and a happy Easter.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE The Defendant states: Nowhere in the evidence has it been proven that the spawn area was "busy" at the time of the incident. The Defendant is attempting to manufacture a "chaotic, social...

The Plaintiff is content to end Discovery if the Defence are.

The Plaintiff will rely on this ruling when drafting his closing statement, and seeks clarification whether to introduce case precedent directly beforehand, or if it shall be permitted in the closing statement.

The Plaintiff respectfully requests clarification from this Honourable Court regarding the application of Court Rules and Procedures Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use) to the citation of case precedent in closing statements. I. BACKGROUND Rule 4.2 (Submission Required For Use) states: Two...

Pursuant to Rule 3.3 (Amendment to Complaint), the Plaintiff amends the Complaint as follows: II. FACTS 14. Since confirmation, and as of 25 October 2025, Judge AmityBlamity has presided over and/or made rulings in eight concluded Federal Court cases: ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025]...

I. SUMMARY OF KEY FACTS Your Honour, the facts of this case are straightforward: 1. On 9 August 2025, at approximately 00:39 UTC+1, the Defendant - then serving as a State Prosecutor - deliberately approached the Plaintiff at spawn and physically stepped on him. The Defendant accompanied this...

Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court conclude discovery and proceed directly to closing statements, bypassing opening statements. No witnesses are being called to give testimony by either party. Given these circumstances, opening statements would simply duplicate...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL The Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to compel the Defendant to immediately comply with their discovery obligations. The Court issued an order requiring the Defendant to provide a corrected answer to Interrogatory No...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY The Plaintiff objects to and moves to strike the Defendant's Answer to Interrogatory No. 1, specifically the statement: This statement constitutes perjury under the Criminal Code Act, Part III, Section 1, which prohibits...