Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION
1. This Hereby Request Vanguard National Bank to post there polices Not changed from original Polices
For the reasons to decide If KingBOB99878 will drop this case
The Purpose of an Emergency Injunction is to prevent harm, not to collect evidence. You may motion to compel in discovery if you still wish for this evidence
@Nexalin is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of kingBOB99878 v. Vanguard National Bank [2024] DCR 41
Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.
Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.
You may, However I will warn you that if it exceeds $20,000 then it will be dismissed and have to be heard in the federal court.Your Honor May The Plaintiff Please Change its Prayer For Reliefs. The Plaintiff Has decided It is not enougth for what the defendant has done
To avoid redundancy in this court and due to the fact we are now entering discovery I will grant this as it is basically a motion to compel at this point.Your Honor ,
I have recently learned that this case will have no legal point if the defendant changes the policies to make it goto there side. Therefore, I am asking you to write a writ of Subponea, to produce the polices before the discovery. By the time of the discovery period they will have had time to change the polices with no one knowing which would take the legal value away from this case.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Vanguard National Bank is required to present their policies unedited.
Please educate yourself for the future. Court procedure has been changed for at least a month so that both Answer to Complaint and Opening Statements happen after discovery. Once discovery has finished you will have your chance to answer and argue against the complaintYour Honour the defence has not been allowed to file a opening statement I request that we be allowed to do so before discovery begins as is the defences civil right.
As you are asking the court to order the defendant to pay you the money then yes it does count towards the total value of the case and towards the $20,000 limitYour honor would the 15,300 dollars from the withdrawl count as part of the 20k
I would like to inform the plaintiff that my original $20,000 limit was incorrect. The LSA where I got my information from says $20,000 but a different act amended the constitution more recently and raised the limit to $40,000. So, if you wish to edit the prayer of relief, please feel free.Your Honor ,
I have changed the prayer of relief
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The Plaintiff Seeks 4,700 dollars for time wasted having to deal with this.
2. The Plaintiff Seeks its 15,300 dollars from the money he has withdrawn
This just Makes the limit
Your Honor,I would like to inform the plaintiff that my original $20,000 limit was incorrect. The LSA where I got my information from says $20,000 but a different act amended the constitution more recently and raised the limit to $40,000. So, if you wish to edit the prayer of relief, please feel free.
Your Honor,Please educate yourself for the future. Court procedure has been changed for at least a month so that both Answer to Complaint and Opening Statements happen after discovery. Once discovery has finished you will have your chance to answer and argue against the complaint
Information - Court Rules and Procedure
To avoid redundancy in this court and due to the fact we are now entering discovery I will grant this as it is basically a motion to compel at this point.
Court Order
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Vanguard National Bank is required to present their policies unedited.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS
The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. The Plaintiff has merely provided a general statement claiming entitlement to the funds based on the Defendant's Policy on Discover Bank; however, D-001 and D-002 clearly demonstrate that this assertion is inaccurate.
2. The Defendant requests an award of $5,000 pursuant to the Legal Damages Act to cover attorney expenses incurred as a result of responding to this litigation.
This case is hereby dismissed with prejudiceYour Honor,
The Plaintiff has decided to drop all charges. On account of that D-001 and D-002 do not say anything about how much time they have to give the client there money. Therefore The plaintiff has dropped all charges
Your Honour I request to still receive a verdict on the motion to dismiss.This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice
No counterclaims will be granted.Your Honour I request to still receive a verdict on the motion to dismiss.
