Your Honor, Members of the court,
This case boils down to a straightforward matter: an auction was conducted, the DCT prematurely closed the proceedings before the 24-hour timeframe elapsed, and awarded the winning bid to Dragons1ayer343, despite the time requirement not being met. Throughout the proceedings, witnesses have substantiated my client's position. Nacho, the DCT Secretary at the time, acknowledged uncertainty regarding the auction's timeline, stating, "It doesn't appear so," in reference to the interval between the pause of the auction and the winning bid being placed within 24 hours. Nacho confirmed attempts to verify the funds in the player's account were inconclusive as they failed to provide a screenshot. A deeper examination reveals that the only bid conforming to the requirements outlined in the Contracts Act was Nexalin's offer of $50,500. All other bids lacked clarity and failed to meet contractual standards. Therefore, Nexalin's bid stands as the only legitimate winning bid. The original auction commenced with a "$" sign, necessitating all subsequent bids to adhere to this format for validity. Regardless of perspective, it's evident the DCT's actions were erroneous. Nacho conceded the premature conclusion of the auction before the 24-hour period, supported by exhibits presented. Furthermore, bids following Nexalin's $50,500 lacked the "$" sign, solidifying its status as the sole valid winning bid. We implore this court to meticulously consider the prayer for relief, as this case, while complex, fundamentally revolves around my client's unjust treatment by the DCT, as shown throughout these proceedings.