Lawsuit: Pending BnyBny_ & TaechiMTEA v. Elv_K [2026] DCR 190

[coslos]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


BnyBny_ and TaechiMTEA
Plaintiffs

v.

Elv_K
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

We paid Elv K 16k upfront, and it's literally been four weeks of endless arguing and terrible communication. Today he tried to close the ticket and claim the job was done, but when I went to check, they only finished 7 out of the 16 floors and left their junk everywhere for me to clean up I managed to squeeze the 2k delay compensation out of him, but now the guy is acting like we need to open a brand new ticket to get them to finish the rest.

I. PARTIES
1. BnyBny_ as the plaintiff
2. TaechiMTEA as the co-plaintiff
3. Elv_K as the defendant

II. FACTS
1. The plaintiff paid sixteen thousand(16k) dollars to the defendant in exchange for building on their skyscraper(P-001, P-002, P-003).
2. The plaintiff gave the defendant one(1) week to finish building(P-003).
3. After that deadhline the construction was not done(P-004, P-005).
4. The plaintiff did not get their payment fully back, the only return was two thousand(2k) in a form of a delay compensation.
5. Five weeks later the construction is not done and the defendant is not responding.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of contract.
The defendant entered a lawfully binding contract under the contracts act Act of Congress - Contracts Act by saying "deal"(P-001).
After that they have proceeded to not finish their obligation therefore breaching the contract.
2. Failure to deliver goods or services.
The defendant has failed to deliver a service that they have agreed to supply under a valid transaction or contract.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Sixteen thousand(16k) dollars in liquidated damages in order to return the payment.
2. Ten thousand(10k) dollars in consequential damages for failure to deliver goods or services.
3. Additional legal fees that the court finds just.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This thirteenth(13th) day of October 2026

Spoiler: defendant agreeing to the contract

Spoiler: the plaintiff paying for the contract

Spoiler: list of tasks from the plaintiff

Spoiler: floor 7 of the building, not fully finished

Spoiler: floor 8, not finished

Spoiler: the plaintiff's consent for representation

 

[Johnes]

Writ of Summons

@Elv_K is hereby commanded to appear before the District Court in the case of BnyBny_ v. Elv_K [2026] DCR 190.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Johnes]

Case Filing

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


BnyBny_
Plaintiff

v.

Elv_K
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF



I. PARTIES
1. BnyBny_ as the plaintiff
2. TaechiMTEA as the co-plaintiff
3. Elv_K as the defendant

II. FACTS
1. The plaintiff paid sixteen thousand(16k) dollars to the defendant in exchange for building on their skyscraper(P-001, P-002, P-003).
2. The plaintiff gave the defendant one(1) week to finish building(P-003).
3. After that deadhline the construction was not done(P-004, P-005).
4. The plaintiff did not get their payment fully back, the only return was two thousand(2k) in a form of a delay compensation.
5. Five weeks later the construction is not done and the defendant is not responding.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of contract.
The defendant entered a lawfully binding contract under the contracts act Act of Congress - Contracts Act by saying "deal"(P-001).
After that they have proceeded to not finish their obligation therefore breaching the contract.
2. Failure to deliver goods or services.
The defendant has failed to deliver a service that they have agreed to supply under a valid transaction or contract.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Sixteen thousand(16k) dollars in liquidated damages in order to return the payment.
2. Ten thousand(10k) dollars in consequential damages for failure to deliver goods or services.
3. Additional legal fees that the court finds just.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This thirteenth(13th) day of October 2026

Spoiler: defendant agreeing to the contract

View attachment 101984

Spoiler: the plaintiff paying for the contract

View attachment 101987

Spoiler: list of tasks from the plaintiff

View attachment 101988

Spoiler: floor 7 of the building, not fully finished

View attachment 101990

Spoiler: floor 8, not finished

View attachment 101994

Spoiler: the plaintiff's consent for representation

View attachment 101992
View attachment 101993

Counsel, could you please amend your filing to include both Plaintiffs in the initial part? The Court will update the thread name accordingly when you do so.

 

[coslos]

Counsel, could you please amend your filing to include both Plaintiffs in the initial part? The Court will update the thread name accordingly when you do so.

The filing has been edited, I apologize for the mistake.

 

[amah853]

Writ of Summons

@Elv_K is hereby commanded to appear before the District Court in the case of BnyBny_ v. Elv_K [2026] DCR 190.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Your Honor,
We are discussing settlement, but our clients have not responded. Can we have an extension? We wouldn't want to accept an offer without approval from our clients first.

Thank you.

 

[Johnes]

Your Honor,
We are discussing settlement, but our clients have not responded. Can we have an extension? We wouldn't want to accept an offer without approval from our clients first.

Thank you.

You are appearing on behalf of Defendant? If so, show evidence of representation and then I'll issue a stay on proceedings.

 

[Johnes]

Defendant failed to appear. I'll give @amah853 24 hours to provide evidence of representation or we'll continue in default judgment.

 

[amah853]

Defendant failed to appear. I'll give @amah853 24 hours to provide evidence of representation or we'll continue in default judgment.

Apologies your honor, I've been unable to contact my client.

It is for this reason I was unable to obtain a statement more explicit then the one attached below.

 

[Johnes]

Apologies your honor, I've been unable to contact my client.

It is for this reason I was unable to obtain a statement more explicit then the one attached below.
View attachment 103349

Alright. I'll grant a stay on proceedings. Please do report back in 72 hours on how settlement negotiations are going.

 

[Johnes]

@amah853, @coslos any updates?

 

[amah853]

@amah853, @coslos any updates?

Our client has now gotten in touch with us as of a few hours ago, and we are proposing an initial offer.

 

[coslos]

@amah853, @coslos any updates?

For now I do not see any way in which my client may get a fair settlement, the plaintiff would like to ask the court and the defendant to continue the case as usual to not further slow down the process.

 

[Johnes]

For now I do not see any way in which my client may get a fair settlement, the plaintiff would like to ask the court and the defendant to continue the case as usual to not further slow down the process.

Upon request from Plaintiff, we will continue on. The stay imposed is hereby lifted.

Defense has 48 hours from now to post an answer @amah853.

 

[amah853]

Upon request from Plaintiff, we will continue on. The stay imposed is hereby lifted.

Defense has 48 hours from now to post an answer @amah853.

It appears the Defense will not agree to a settlement. We will persue this case.

KeystoneLaw has assigned @KeyChnky321 to this case, and I am switching counsel to him, effective immediately, to represent Elv_K.

 

[KeyChunky321]

Present, your Honor

 

[Johnes]

Present, your Honor

As? No PD was requested

 

[Johnes]

@amah853 you're hereby given a 24 hour extension sua sponte. Failure to adhere to it will result in contempt and default.

 

[amah853]

@amah853 you're hereby given a 24 hour extension sua sponte. Failure to adhere to it will result in contempt and default.

KeystoneLaw has assigned @KeyChnky321 to this case, and I am switching counsel to him, effective immediately, to represent Elv_K.

Your Honor, @KeyChunky321 is the assigned Barrister on behalf of KeystoneLaw.

 

[KeyChunky321]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT



BnyBny_ and TaechiMTEA



Plaintiff



v.



Elv_K



Defendant



I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The Defense denies that the Plaintiff paid 16,000 $.

2. The Defense affirms that the Plaintiff gave the Defendant a deadline of one (1) week.

3. The Defense affirms that the Construction was not after the deadline expired.

4. The Defense denies that neither the upfront payment was refunded nor a delay compensation of 2,000$ was paid.

5. The Defense affirms that the construction was not done after five (5) weeks, but denies that the Defendant was not responding.



II. DEFENCES

1. The Plaintiff has not shown any evidence that a payment of 16,000$ was made.

2. Even though the construction was not finished, seven out of 16 floors were. According to the contract, the value of each floor can be estimated as 1,000$ each. The liquidated damages the Plaintiff asked for should not exceed the value of the contract and what was already delivered.

3. The Plaintiff did not experience any indirect losses from the Breach of Contract. Therefore, no consequential damages should be awarded.





By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.



DATED: This third day of November 2026

 

[Johnes]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT



BnyBny_ and TaechiMTEA



Plaintiff



v.



Elv_K



Defendant



I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The Defense denies that the Plaintiff paid 16,000 $.

2. The Defense affirms that the Plaintiff gave the Defendant a deadline of one (1) week.

3. The Defense affirms that the Construction was not after the deadline expired.

4. The Defense denies that neither the upfront payment was refunded nor a delay compensation of 2,000$ was paid.

5. The Defense affirms that the construction was not done after five (5) weeks, but denies that the Defendant was not responding.



II. DEFENCES

1. The Plaintiff has not shown any evidence that a payment of 16,000$ was made.

2. Even though the construction was not finished, seven out of 16 floors were. According to the contract, the value of each floor can be estimated as 1,000$ each. The liquidated damages the Plaintiff asked for should not exceed the value of the contract and what was already delivered.

3. The Plaintiff did not experience any indirect losses from the Breach of Contract. Therefore, no consequential damages should be awarded.





By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.



DATED: This third day of November 2026

Discovery is open for 5 days.

 

[coslos]

Additional evidence

Spoiler: P-006 2nd payment made to the defendant

 

[coslos]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT



BnyBny_ and TaechiMTEA



Plaintiff



v.



Elv_K



Defendant



I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

1. The Defense denies that the Plaintiff paid 16,000 $.

2. The Defense affirms that the Plaintiff gave the Defendant a deadline of one (1) week.

3. The Defense affirms that the Construction was not after the deadline expired.

4. The Defense denies that neither the upfront payment was refunded nor a delay compensation of 2,000$ was paid.

5. The Defense affirms that the construction was not done after five (5) weeks, but denies that the Defendant was not responding.



II. DEFENCES

1. The Plaintiff has not shown any evidence that a payment of 16,000$ was made.

2. Even though the construction was not finished, seven out of 16 floors were. According to the contract, the value of each floor can be estimated as 1,000$ each. The liquidated damages the Plaintiff asked for should not exceed the value of the contract and what was already delivered.

3. The Plaintiff did not experience any indirect losses from the Breach of Contract. Therefore, no consequential damages should be awarded.





By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.



DATED: This third day of November 2026

Objection

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - SPECULATION
Point 4 of the answer to complaint denies that no payments were made yet shows no evidence of the return or reasons that would have place.