- Joined
- May 27, 2026
- Messages
- 28
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Teji2,
Plaintiff;
&
Henessyy,
Co-Plaintiff
v.
Cpvp_Dog
Defendant
CIVIL ACTION
Teji2,
Plaintiff;
&
Henessyy,
Co-Plaintiff
v.
Cpvp_Dog
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against Defendant as follows:I. PARTIES
1. Teji2 (Plaintiff)2. Henessyy (Co-Plaintiff)
3. Cpvp_Dog (Defendant)
II. FACTS
Incident 11. On July 8th, 2026, Plaintiff Teji2 responded to an in-game /ad posted by Defendant Cpvp_Dog which stated "Selling gold drill msg me" (Exhibit P-001).
2. After reaching out and agreeing on a price of $9k for the gold drill, Plaintiff Teji2 and Defendant proceeded to meet at the airport, where the deal was meant to go down.
3. After finding each other and confirming on the price again, Defendant stated: "Yes I agree 9k for the drill If I scam you can Sue me -CPVP_DOG" and "there u have my word" (Exhibit P-002).
4. Plaintiff Teji2 responded: "sound" and sent the money (Exhibit P-003).
5. After getting the money, Defendant messaged "tys" and "pleasure doing business" and teleported away after dropping a normal chest item (Exhibit P-004).
6. Following this, Defendant proceeded to return to the airport and mock Plaintiff Teji2.
Incident 2
7. Defendant did not stop there. Again on July 8th, 2026, Co-Plaintiff Henessyy responded to an in-game /vc posted by Defendant which stated "im selling a gold drill who wants" (Exhibit P-005).
8. After reaching out and agreeing on a price of $10k for the gold drill, Defendant responded: "Deal" (Exhibit P-005).
9. Co-Plaintiff Henessyy and Defendant proceeded to meet up at the courts.
10. Co-Plaintiff Henessyy informed Defendant he was recording, and Defendant stated "record it if u want im not a scammer i js owe money 2 a loan" (Exhibit P-006).
11. The two once again agreed on the price of $10k, and Defendant stated: "If I scam Hennessy Feel free to sue me we agreed on 10k for This gold DRILL" (Exhibit P-007).
12. Co-Plaintiff Henessyy then proceeded to pay the $10k to Defendant (Exhibit P-007).
13. Defendant proceeded to pretend they were lagging, log off the server, and log back on the server.
14. Once logging back on, Defendant repeatedly claimed that he never received the money, stating "did u pay me?", "i have 0 dollars still" , and "i dont see it in /transactions" (Exhibit P-008).
15. Following this, Defendant transferred the money elsewhere so it would not show up in his balance.
16. Co-Plaintiff Henessyy provided a screenshot via Discord as Defendant claimed that upon this screenshot he would drop the golden drill (Exhibit P-009).
17. After sending the screenshot, Defendant teleported away.
18. In a similar manner to his scam against Plaintiff Teji2, Defendant came back to mock Co-Plaintiff Henessyy, offering him a free drill, stating: "u want drill?" and "no for free lol" (Exhibit P-010).
19. Once the two met up outside of courts again, Defendant pulled the drill out to show it off and dropped Co-Plaintiff Henessyy a normal chest item, teleporting away again (Exhibit P-011).
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
III.1 Breach of Contract
In the Redmont Civil Code Act, Breach of Contract is a strict liability civil violation defined as:(RCCA, Part VI, Section 1).
Both Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff allege the Defendant had entered into a valid contract with each of them, the Defendant then failed to follow through with their obligations in each respective contract, which triggers liability for the Defendant under the Redmont Civil Code Act, as the Defendant lacks a lawful excuse for a failure to perform.
III.1.A Defendant committed Breach of Contract against both, Plaintiff Teji2 and Co-Plaintiff Henessyy
In both incidents, a valid contract was formed between both, Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff and the Defendant respectively as defined by Contracts Act §4. In the case of Teji2, a contract was negotiated and agreed upon via messages before Defendant stated: "Yes I agree 9k for the drill If I scam you can Sue me -CPVP_DOG" (Exhibit P-002). Following this confirmation Plaintiff Teji2 sent the agreed upon $9,000, to which Defendant dropped a normal chest item (Exhibit P-003). In the situation of Teji2, there was clear offer, acceptance, consideration, intent, and capacity.
In the case of Co-Plaintiff Henessyy, a contract was negotiated and agreed upon via messages before Defendant stated: "If I scam Hennessy Feel free to sue me we agreed on 10k for This gold DRILL" (Exhibit P-007). Following this confirmation Co-Plaintiff Henessyy sent the agreed upon $10,000, to which the Defendant attempted to say they lagged out and had not received any money (Exhibit P-007). Defendant then came back to courts a few minutes later, and dropped Co-Plaintiff a normal chest item (Exhibit P-011). In the situation of Henessyy, there was clear offer, acceptance, consideration, intent, and capacity.
The defendant breached the contract by failing to fulfill their part of the contract, which was the delivery of a golden drill, even after both Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff fulfilled their part of the contract. Through messages, the Defendant proposed and agreed to a contract, which they failed to follow through on.
III.2 Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce
In the Redmont Civil Code Act, Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce is an intentional/negligent civil violation defined as:
III.2.A Defendant committed Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce against Plaintiff Teji2
Plaintiff Teji2 entered into a contract with Defendant after Defendant stated: "Yes I agree 9k for the drill If I scam you can Sue me -CPVP_DOG" (Exhibit P-002). This statement was untrue from Defendant, although they were in possession of a golden drill, once Plaintiff paid the agreed upon $9,000, Defendant dropped Plaintiff a normal chest item, following up by saying "tys" and "pleasure doing business" acting as though nothing had happened (Exhibit P-004).
The act of coming back to the airport after to mock Plaintiff shows Defendant knew what they were doing and took purposeful action in attempt to deceive Plaintiff. The delivery of the normal chest item once again proves that Defendant was intending to deceive and make away with money that did not belong to them, proven again when Defendant begun advertising the drill in chat again immediately following this event.
By engaging in this misleading and deceptive conduct towards Plaintiff Teji2, in connection with the advertisement and sale of a golden drill to Plaintiff, Defendant has committed Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce against Plaintiff Teji2.
III.2.B Defendant committed Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce against Co-Plaintiff Henessyy
Co-Plaintiff Henessyy entered into a contract with Defendant after Defendant stated: "Deal" in response to Co-Plaintiff message of: "10k?" (Exhibit P-005). More proof of Defendant entering into contract exists at the statement of: "If I scam Hennessy Feel free to sue me we agreed on 10k for This gold DRILL" (Exhibit P-007). This statement was again untrue from Defendant, although they were in possession of a golden drill, and showed it off to Co-Plaintiff, once Plaintiff paid the agreed upon $10,000, Defendant proceeded to pretend they had lagged out and did not receive the money, teleported away, and came back before dropping Co-Plaintiff a normal chest item (Exhibit P-011).
The act of pretending to have lagged out and not receiving the money, as well as transferring the money out from Defendant's account, shows consciousness of guilt and an attempt to hide and deceive. Defendant then returned to mock Co-Plaintiff by offering a "free" drill (Exhibit P-010).. And ultimately dropped Co-Plaintiff a normal chest item before leaving once and for all (Exhibit P-011). Defendant then began to advertise the golden drill in chat, once more.
By engaging in this misleading and deceptive conduct towards Co-Plaintiff Henessyy, in connection with the advertisement (via /vc) and sale of a golden drill to Co-Plaintiff, Defendant has committed Misleading Conduct in Trade of Commerce against Plaintiff Henessyy.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:1. Compensatory Damages: Plaintiff paid $9,000 to Defendant, whereas Co-Plaintiff paid $10,000. In total, this means making Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff whole would require $19,000, shared between the Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff in proportion to the size of their losses.
2. Punitive Damages: As defined in the Redmont Civil Code Act (Part III, (2(a))), “Punitive damages will not be awarded unless they are either authorised by statute or unless the conduct of the other party in causing the party’s harm is outrageous”. Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff allege the conduct of Defendant has crossed the threshold of outrageous by repeating this pattern of taking hard-earned money from good-faith attempted buyers of golden drills, not only doing this to both Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff, but attempting to continue afterwards. It is worth noting that under Part VI Section 3, the civil violation of “Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce” permits up to 250 civil penalty units per civil violation. As such, Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff request $50,000 in punitive damages, distributed equally among Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff.
3. Nominal Damages: If, and only if no other damages can be awarded, then Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff seek restitution in the form nominal damages of $7,500 each to acknowledge harm done by Defendant to Plaintiff and Co-Plaintiff.
4. Legal Fees: Plaintiff seeks 30% of the total damages awarded as legal fees.
V. EVIDENCE
VI. WITNESS LIST
1. Teji22. Henessyy
3. Cpvp_Dog
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 9 day of July 2026
