Lawsuit: Pending Bankruptcy Petition - Dino Nuggie Bank LLC, Debtor [2026] FCR XXX.

PostOfficeTower

Citizen
Aventura Resident
Commerce Department
PostOfficeTower
PostOfficeTower
Compliance Officer
Joined
Apr 14, 2026
Messages
58

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
BANKRUPTCY PETITION

PostOfficeTower, Bardiya_King, AverageAnnika (Creditors & Petitioners)
- v -
Dino Nuggie Bank LLC (Debtor)

Parties:
1. PostOfficeTower, Creditor & Petitioner
2. Bardiya_King, Creditor & Petitioner
3. AverageAnnika, Creditor & Petitioner
4. PetitRenard_, Creditor
4. AsexualDinosaur (Authorised Representative of Dino Nuggie Bank LLC, Debtor)

The Creditors, having satisfied the requirements pursuant to Part II §7 of the Bankruptcy Act do hereby petition the Federal Court to declare Dino Nuggie Bank LLC, a Financial Institution based in Reveille, Commonwealth of Redmont as bankrupt pursuant to Chapter V of the Bankruptcy Act - this is because the Debtor is insolvent and thus unable to meet it's obligations to it's creditors. The creditors seek either: Liquidation, or Reorganisation.

Particulars of Debt:

PostOfficeTower - Owed R$5,000 by the Debtor (C-002)
AverageAnnika - Owed R$5,000 by the Debtor (C-003)
Bardiya_King - Owed R$160,000 by the Debtor (C-004)
PetitRenard_ - Owed R$514,000 by the Debtor (C-005)

Total Liabilities: R$684,000 owed to the Petitioners.

1783633338339.png

1783633736514.png

1783633704108.png

1783633655905.png

1783633667299.png

1783633679835.png

1783633688862.png

1783636003584.png
1783635980969.png

1783635993317.png

1783636013061.png

10 in barrel held in DNB Vault #3:
1783636028013.png

Addendum: I am aware the Court has not issued any formal template for the filing of Bankruptcy Act petitions yet, and I hope the Court will accept what I have cobbled together as acceptable for the initiation of proceedings.

Addendum 2: The Bankruptcy Act gives the Federal Court original jurisdiction over hearing bankruptcy cases under Part II §1(4).

 

Attachments

  • 1783635960081.png
    1783635960081.png
    43.1 KB · Views: 9
  • 1783635972632.png
    1783635972632.png
    32.2 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
Proof of Representation

1783633959037.png

1783633981389.png
 
I have edited the petition to make some clarifications and a conduct a minor rewrite, the particulars of the petition remain the same.
 

Motion


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR AN EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your Honour,

I pray the Court issues an order to freeze the assets of Dino Nuggie Bank LLC for the duration of proceedings until a determination can be made, this is supported by the Automatic Stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, which reads:

"5. The Automatic Stay

(1) Upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, an automatic stay takes immediate effect on all of the following:

(a) Commencement or continuation of any lawsuit against the debtor for collection of a pre-petition debt;

(b) Enforcement of any judgment against the debtor or property of the estate;

(c) Any act to obtain possession of, or exercise control over, property of the estate;

(d) Asset seizure procedures under the Debt Recovery Quick Fix Act;

(e) Any act to create, perfect, or enforce a lien against property of the estate; and

(f) Direct collection efforts, including in-game and out-of-game demands for payment."

Such an Order would prevent individual depositors from claiming any funds back from the bank through in-game or out-of-game direct collection efforts.

 
View attachment 90198


Staff continues to investigate the incident regarding DNB. The case is frozen pending advisement from the Staff Team.
Your Honour,

Dino Nuggie Bank was offered the choice of acquiring emergency liquidity from the Federal Reserve Bank to pay out depositors -instead, the Debtor referred to the FRB as "terrorists" and subsequently left the server. I ask the Court to reconsider, as the Bankruptcy Act allows the Court to call on the FRB to provide emergency liquidity in the event of an accepted petition.
 
Your Honour,

Dino Nuggie Bank was offered the choice of acquiring emergency liquidity from the Federal Reserve Bank to pay out depositors -instead, the Debtor referred to the FRB as "terrorists" and subsequently left the server. I ask the Court to reconsider, as the Bankruptcy Act allows the Court to call on the FRB to provide emergency liquidity in the event of an accepted petition.

While we're discussing a case in a docket thread, I'm a judicial officer. I opened a ticket with Staff to inquire as to the state of their investigation. An admin then advised me that they're still investigating. Since they're still investigating, this case is frozen.


See this case where Staff, pending an investigation, froze a case.
 
Your honour, I find it pertinent to point out that that case was suspended by the staff team themselves - not by a judicial officer or the assigned justice - and their freeze specifically applied to the execution of a verdict, not the initiation of proceedings. I would argue that precedent is inapplicable, and again move for the court to reconsider.
 
Your honour, I find it pertinent to point out that that case was suspended by the staff team themselves - not by a judicial officer or the assigned justice - and their freeze specifically applied to the execution of a verdict, not the initiation of proceedings. I would argue that precedent is inapplicable, and again move for the court to reconsider.

So noted.
 
Your Honour, I would like to request a ruling on my motion to reconsider, given the new facts the Court has noted.

The case is frozen, this won't be reconsidered. Staff needs to advise that they're completed with their investigation.

That's all.
 
The case is frozen, this won't be reconsidered. Staff needs to advise that they're completed with their investigation.

That's all.
Your Honour, this sets a very dangerous precedent of permitting staff to intervene in judicial processes - whilst it is permissible for the execution of a verdict to be halted pending staff decision as is the case with things such as the owner veto preventing the implementation of a law - to allow them to prevent the initiation of proceedings is unheard of, and the precedent that this sets will have wide reaching implications if similar matters were to come before the Court.
 
Your Honour, this sets a very dangerous precedent of permitting staff to intervene in judicial processes - whilst it is permissible for the execution of a verdict to be halted pending staff decision as is the case with things such as the owner veto preventing the implementation of a law - to allow them to prevent the initiation of proceedings is unheard of, and the precedent that this sets will have wide reaching implications if similar matters were to come before the Court.

The staff team is absolutely within its right to freeze a Court case pending investigation.

The reason for freezing this case is that an incident outside of normal server mechanics has caused this current situation. The staff team is responsible for ensuring that players and businesses are minimally affected by such incidents. Pending a decision on that matter, we will freeze any and all related procedures to prevent the situation from becoming increasingly difficult to resolve from a staff perspective.

This case is frozen until further notice, and any effects from its filing are suspended.
 
Back
Top