Lawsuit: Pending Desertstorm49 et al v. marseywpd, poktizoc [2026] FCR 55

[DaanBanaan5673]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

On behalf of my clients, I am requesting $243,175.69 belonging to the Defendant be frozen. Defendant is alleged to be operating an unlicensed banking institution, which is in violation of the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act. $243,175.69 is the total amount my clients have deposited with the Defendant, and we need at least that much to make my clients whole. We submit this motion to prevent irreparable harm to my clients.

Spoiler: Proof of deposits

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

Spoiler: Proof of representation

 

[Muggy21]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

On behalf of my clients, I am requesting $243,175.69 belonging to the Defendant be frozen. Defendant is alleged to be operating an unlicensed banking institution, which is in violation of the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act. $243,175.69 is the total amount my clients have deposited with the Defendant, and we need at least that much to make my clients whole. We submit this motion to prevent irreparable harm to my clients.

Spoiler: Proof of deposits

View attachment 87810View attachment 87811View attachment 87812

How do I know its unlicensed?

 

[Muggy21]

How do I know its unlicensed?

Disregard this statement.

The EI is granted. DHS shall seize $243,000 and hold it in line w/ this injunction.

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@marseywpd @poktizoc You are hereby summoned to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Desertstorm49, Z0OVD, TankBroman1010 v. marseywpd [2026] FCR 55.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[MJL]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Pin_kx,
Plaintiff

v.

"Goldman Capital",
marseywpd,
poktizoc,
Kvalej,
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

I. PARTIES
1. Pin_kx (Co-Plaintiff and my client)
2. Desertstorm49 (Plaintiff)
3. TankBroman1010 (Co-Plaintiff)
4. Z0OVD (Co-Plaintiff)
5. Atrile (Co-Plaintiff)
6. marseywpd (co-Defendant)
7. poktizoc (co-Defendant)
8. Kvalej (co-Defendant)
10. "Goldman Capital" (an unincorporated business)

II. FACTS
1. Pin_kx ("Pink") is resident of Redmont who sought the services of a banking institution.
2. "Goldman Capital" is the name of a disbanded sole-proprietorship (""P-M002") which was led by an unknown individual called "Hatsune Guy" ("P-M001").
3. On 23 June 2026, poktizoc advertised Goldman Capital ("P-M003"). He was paid $1,000 for this or other services ("P-M001").
4. poktizoc is the listed owner of ElytraPayments ("P-M005") which is used to transfer funds from Goldman Capital ("P-M102" & "P-M103").
5. marseywpd is the name of a new player who was contacted to verify a discord account for pay on behalf of Hatsune Guy ("P-M001" & "P-M004").
6. Kvalej is the identified owner of the Goldman Capital Bank corporate account ("P-M006").
7. On 26 June 2026, Pink deposited $30,000 into a bank account allegedly controlled by Goldman Capital ("P-M101", "P-M102", "P-M103").
8. On the same day, Pink (through her legal representative) requested her funds be withdrawn from Goldman Capital ("P-M201").
9. The ticket was closed, Pink's attorney was banned from the Discord server, and no funds were withdrawn.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption under RCCA (a tort recently added by the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act).
2. As the the defendants acted in organized coordination with one another, it should be found that they be considered jointly liable for damages.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendants jointly:
1. $30,000 in compensatory damages for restitution of lost funds.
2. $20,000 in compensatory damages for Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption.
3. As Pink's legal representative, I waive any claim to legal fees. This decision was made to maximise the funds available for restitution to all victims.
4. Any other relief this court may allow.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: 27 June 2026

Spoiler: P-M001

Spoiler: P-M002

Spoiler: P-M003

Spoiler: P-M004

Spoiler: P-M005

Spoiler: P-M006

Spoiler: P-M101

Spoiler: P-M102

Spoiler: P-M103

Spoiler: P-M201

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Desertstorm49,
Z0OVD,
TankBroman1010,
Atrile,
Plaintiffs

v.

marseywpd,
poktizoc,
GoldmanCapitalBank,
Kvalej,
Defendants

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs complain against the Defendants as follows:

I. PARTIES
1. Desertstorm49 (Plaintiff and my client)
2. Z0OVD (Co-Plaintiff and my client)
3. TankBroman1010 (Co-Plaintiff and my client)
4. Atrile (Co-Plaintiff and my client)
5. Pin_kx (Co-Plaintiff)
5. marseywpd (Co-Defendant)
6. poktizoc (Co-Defendant)
7. Kvalej (Co-Defendant)
8. GoldmanCapitalBank (unincorporated business owned by Kvalej)

II. FACTS

1. Plaintiffs have a total of $254,926.89 in funds with GoldmanCapitalBank (Exhibits A, B, C and R).
2. GoldmanCapitalBank is not registered as a Financial Institution with the Department of Commerce (Exhibit D).
3. Defendant marseywpd used “mules” to turn money into ingots (Exhibits E, F and G).
4. Customers make a payment to ElytraPayments which get forwarded to GoldmanCapitalBank (Exhibits H, I and J).
5. GoldmanCapitalBank is managed by marseywpd.
6. ElytraPayments is owned by poktizoc.
7. GoldmanCapitalBank has taken at least $433,392.82 worth of deposits (Exhibit J).
8. poktizoc made a post in #businesses about Goldman Capital Group (Exhibit K).
9. GoldmanCapitalBank has a “Terms & Conditions” page (Exhibit L, M, N, O).
10. marseywpd refuses to withdraw the money of the Plaintiffs (Exhibit P).
11. GoldmanCapitalBank claims to be “FDRC Compliant” (Exhibit Q).
12. GoldmanCapitalBank is owned by Kvalej.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Defendant marseywpd is operating an unregistered Financial Institution and has taken on deposits exceeding 500 penal units ($60,000.00). Furthermore, the Plaintiffs believe Defendant marseywpd has, by turning the deposits into minerals through “mules”, dissipated and concealed customer funds. Aggravated Operation of an Unregistered Financial Institution is illegal under Part VII of the Criminal Code Act.
2. Defendant marseywpd has withdrawn the money from GoldmanCapitalBank and had “mules” turn it into minerals, by doing so, the Plaintiffs believe marseywpd has made himself guilty to Breach of Client-Fund Segregation Duty under part X of the Criminal Code Act.
3. GoldmanCapitalBank is not registered as a Commercial Bank. “Bank” is a protected term that can only be used by Financial Institutions. As such, we believe Defendant marseywpd has made themselves guilty of False Representation as a Financial Institution, which is illegal under Part VII of the Criminal Code Act.
4. Defendant poktizoc advertised that the Goldman Capital Bank is a bank, which is a protected term only for Financial Institution. As such, the Plaintiffs believe he has made himself guilty of Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce, which is illegal under Part VI of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
5. The Plaintiffs believe they were misled by Defendant marseywpd as the Terms & Conditions state that withdrawals are processed “swiftly” and “within one Redmont City business day”, however, the Defendant refused to process the withdrawal. The Plaintiffs believe this constitutes Breach of Contract under Part VI of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
6. The Plaintiffs believe Defendant marseywpd has made himself guilty of Unjust Enrichment. Part X of the Redmont Civil Code Act defines Unjust Enrichment as obtaining and retaining a benefit at another’s expense and there not being a legal justification for it. The Defendant has allegedly converted deposited funds into physical assets, which are no longer accessible to the Plaintiffs . The Plaintiffs do not believe there is legal justification for this and believe it was as their expense, as they are now unable to withdraw their money.
7. The Plaintiffs believe Defendant marseywpd has misled them by claiming on GoldmanCapitalBank’s website that they are “FDCR” compliant, which conveyed to users that the institution operated within applicable regulatory standards. This representation was misleading and induced users to deposit funds under the belief that the institution was regulated and safe. Therefore, the Plaintiffs believe that Defendant marseywpd has made themselves guilty of Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce under Part VI of the Redmont Civil Code Act.
8. Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption under the Redmont Civil Code Act (a tort added by the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act).


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiffs seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Restitution of $254,926.89 in compensatory damages for the total funds in the accounts.
2. $80,000 in compensatory damages for Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption, $20,000 per plaintiff.
3. The Plaintiffs and myself waive any claim to legal fees. This decision was made to maximise the funds available for restitution to all victims.
4. Any other relief the Court deems just and proper.

Witnesses:

1. marseywpd
2. poktizoc
3. Kvalej
4. Z0OVD
5. Desertstorm49
6. TankBroman1010
7. Atrile

V. ATTESTATION
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 27th day of June 2026.

Spoiler: Exhibit A

Spoiler: Exhibit B

Spoiler: Exhibit C

Spoiler: Exhibit D

Spoiler: Exhibit E

Spoiler: Exhibit F

Spoiler: Exhibit G

Spoiler: Exhibit H

Spoiler: Exhibit I

Spoiler: Exhibit J

Spoiler: Exhibit K

Spoiler: Exhibit L

Spoiler: Exhibit M

Spoiler: Exhibit N

Spoiler: Exhibit O

Spoiler: Exhibit P

Spoiler: Exhibit Q

Spoiler: Exhibit R

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@marseywpd @poktizoc You are hereby summoned to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Desertstorm49, Z0OVD, TankBroman1010 v. marseywpd [2026] FCR 55.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Parties have failed to appear, a Public Defender will be called.

 

[MJL]

Parties have failed to appear, a Public Defender will be called.

Your honor... something has seriously gone wrong here. My client was fined more than 12k for a court order? She also lost her entire inventory, ender chest, and supporter chest.

D-did you mean to do that?

Spoiler: P-M00X

 

[Muggy21]

Your honor... something has seriously gone wrong here. My client was fined more than 12k for a court order? She also lost her entire inventory, ender chest, and supporter chest.

D-did you mean to do that?

Spoiler: P-M00X

View attachment 88499

No, I accidentally lumped in your client in this Court's original EI decision when relaying the instruction to the DHS. She will be refunded fully. DHS has images of everything seized and the we'll endeavour to ensure she's made whole.


Again, sorry about that.

 

[Dartanboy]

Parties have failed to appear, a Public Defender will be called.

@gribble19 has been assigned.

 

[gribble19]

Present, your Honor.

I am respectfully requesting clarification on which parties to this case all fall under my representation.

 

[Muggy21]

Present, your Honor.

I am respectfully requesting clarification on which parties to this case all fall under my representation.

Named defendants, the bank is not entitled to public defense.

 

[gribble19]

Named defendants, the bank is not entitled to public defense.

Am I correct in understanding this to mean that the parties I am representing in this case are marseywpd and poktizoc, your Honor?

 

[Muggy21]

Am I correct in understanding this to mean that the parties I am representing in this case are marseywpd and poktizoc, your Honor?

Yes!

 

[MJL]

Yes!

Your honor, can Kvalej be summoned to this case? They are a party in both complaints.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

The Plaintiffs move that the Court grant default judgement in Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd and poktizoc, and in support thereof, respectfully allege:

1. Pursuant to §35(9), every citizen, whether criminal or otherwise, has a right to a fair and speedy trial, which includes my clients.
2. Approximately five days has elapsed since the Court has confirmed to the Public Defender that they are to represent marseywpd and poktizoc in this case.
3. The Public Defender has failed to file an Answer to Complaint.
4. The Public Defender has likewise failed to notify the Court of any request for an extension, any period of inactivity, or any other circumstance that would reasonably explain or justify the failure to respond.

Respectfully submitted,
DaanBanaan5673, counsel for the Plaintiffs Desertstorm49, TankBroman1010, Z0OVD, Atrile.

 

[gribble19]

Brief

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honor,
Defendants have not yet been told by the Court that they may file their Answer to Complaint nor have they been given a deadline to do so. The Defendants oppose this Motion for Default Judgement accordingly.

Thank you.

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@Kvalej is ordered to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Desertstorm49 et al v. Marseywpd [2026] FCR 55

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

The Plaintiffs move that the Court grant default judgement in Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd and poktizoc, and in support thereof, respectfully allege:

1. Pursuant to §35(9), every citizen, whether criminal or otherwise, has a right to a fair and speedy trial, which includes my clients.
2. Approximately five days has elapsed since the Court has confirmed to the Public Defender that they are to represent marseywpd and poktizoc in this case.
3. The Public Defender has failed to file an Answer to Complaint.
4. The Public Defender has likewise failed to notify the Court of any request for an extension, any period of inactivity, or any other circumstance that would reasonably explain or justify the failure to respond.

Respectfully submitted,
DaanBanaan5673, counsel for the Plaintiffs Desertstorm49, TankBroman1010, Z0OVD, Atrile.

DENIED, the Court has been under a tremendous workload and intentionally hasn't requested an Answer from Defense.

@gribble19 Unless the additional defendant appears with counsel, please include Kvalej in your Defense. You have 48 Hours to offer an Answer. If you'd like to add the summons period for the new defendant, please advise the Court.

 

[gribble19]

Your Honor,
I respectfully request that in case Co-Defendant Kvalej does not appear with counsel, a different Public Defender be called to represent Co-Defendant Kvalej. I do not believe that I can, in good conscience and in line with the Legal Code of Conduct, represent Co-Defendant Kvalej in this matter while continuing to represent the Co-Defendants I am currently representing in this matter.
Thank you.

 

[Muggy21]

Your Honor,
I respectfully request that in case Co-Defendant Kvalej does not appear with counsel, a different Public Defender be called to represent Co-Defendant Kvalej. I do not believe that I can, in good conscience and in line with the Legal Code of Conduct, represent Co-Defendant Kvalej in this matter while continuing to represent the Co-Defendants I am currently representing in this matter.
Thank you.

Understood, the Court will secure a public defender for the defendant.

 

[gribble19]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
Submitted by Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc.

Your Honor,

both the Complaint submitted by Pin_kx as well as the Complaint submitted by the other Co-Plaintiffs against, among others, Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc are not clear on against which of the named Co-Defendants the alleged Claim for Relief of "Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption" is being made. It is also unclear which Prayers for Relief are being requested from which Co-Defendants in both Complaints, as both Complaints refer to requesting relief from "Defendant", however no party is noted as "Defendant" under Section 1 of either Complaint.

The Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc respectfully request that all Co-Plaintiffs be made to amend their Complaints such that it is clear which claims and prayers are being made and requested from which Co-Defendants, such that Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc can properly answer to these Complaint.

The Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc furthermore respectfully request an extension to the deadline for submitting their answers to these Complaints until 24 hours after the matters brought forward in this objection have been resolved.

Thank you.

 

[Muggy21]

Objection

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
Submitted by Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc.

Your Honor,

both the Complaint submitted by Pin_kx as well as the Complaint submitted by the other Co-Plaintiffs against, among others, Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc are not clear on against which of the named Co-Defendants the alleged Claim for Relief of "Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption" is being made. It is also unclear which Prayers for Relief are being requested from which Co-Defendants in both Complaints, as both Complaints refer to requesting relief from "Defendant", however no party is noted as "Defendant" under Section 1 of either Complaint.

The Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc respectfully request that all Co-Plaintiffs be made to amend their Complaints such that it is clear which claims and prayers are being made and requested from which Co-Defendants, such that Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc can properly answer to these Complaint.

The Co-Defendants Marseypwd and Poktizoc furthermore respectfully request an extension to the deadline for submitting their answers to these Complaints until 24 hours after the matters brought forward in this objection have been resolved.

Thank you.

@MJL @DaanBanaan5673 Either clarify your complaints (if applicable) or respond to the objection.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs, pursuant to the Court’s request to amend the complaint, moves that the Court grant the following amendment to the complaint:

Under section 3 (“Claims for Relief”):
8. Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption under the Redmont Civil Code Act (a tort added by the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act).
9. Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption under the Redmont Civil Code Act (a tort added by the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act) by Defendant marseywpd.

Under section 4 (“Prayer for Relief”):
1. Restitution of $254,926.89 in compensatory damages for the total funds in the accounts.
1. Restitution of $254,926.89 in compensatory damages for the total funds in the accounts by Defendant marseywpd.
2. $80,000 in compensatory damages for Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption, $20,000 per plaintiff.
2. $80,000 in compensatory damages for Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption, $20,000 per plaintiff, from Defendant marseywpd.

Where the strikethrough text is removed and the bolded text is added.

Respectfully submitted,
DaanBanaan5673, counsel for the Plaintiffs Desertstorm49, TankBroman1010, Z0OVD, Atrile.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

The Plaintiffs move that the Court grant default judgement in Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd and poktizoc against Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc, and in support thereof, respectfully allege:

1. The Court previously denied the Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgement because no deadline for an Answer had been issued. The Court has since ordered the Public Defender to file an Answer to the Complaint on behalf of Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc within 48 hours.
2. The Public Defender has failed to file an Answer to the Complaint within the timeframe ordered by the Court.
3. The Public Defender has likewise failed to notify the Court of any request for an extension or any period of inactivity that would reasonably justify the failure to respond.

Respectfully submitted,
DaanBanaan5673, counsel for the Plaintiffs Desertstorm49, TankBroman1010, Z0OVD and Atrile.

 

[Muggy21]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs, pursuant to the Court’s request to amend the complaint, moves that the Court grant the following amendment to the complaint:

Under section 3 (“Claims for Relief”):
8. Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption under the Redmont Civil Code Act (a tort added by the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act).
9. Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption under the Redmont Civil Code Act (a tort added by the Financial Institutions Enforcement Act) by Defendant marseywpd.

Under section 4 (“Prayer for Relief”):
1. Restitution of $254,926.89 in compensatory damages for the total funds in the accounts.
1. Restitution of $254,926.89 in compensatory damages for the total funds in the accounts by Defendant marseywpd.
2. $80,000 in compensatory damages for Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption, $20,000 per plaintiff.
2. $80,000 in compensatory damages for Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption, $20,000 per plaintiff, from Defendant marseywpd.

Where the strikethrough text is removed and the bolded text is added.

Respectfully submitted,
DaanBanaan5673, counsel for the Plaintiffs Desertstorm49, TankBroman1010, Z0OVD, Atrile.

The motion is administratively granted, as a motion to amend a complaint isn't actually required.

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@Kvalej is ordered to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Desertstorm49 et al v. Marseywpd [2026] FCR 55

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

DENIED, the Court has been under a tremendous workload and intentionally hasn't requested an Answer from Defense.

@gribble19 Unless the additional defendant appears with counsel, please include Kvalej in your Defense. You have 48 Hours to offer an Answer. If you'd like to add the summons period for the new defendant, please advise the Court.

This party as failed to appear and it is in the opinion of the Court that the Public Defender program is stretched thin. The Court will seek private counsel to represent the interests of this Defendant.

 

[Muggy21]

This party as failed to appear and it is in the opinion of the Court that the Public Defender program is stretched thin. The Court will seek private counsel to represent the interests of this Defendant.

@NoMoreUno


Thanks for assisting the Court. You're a public defender. As a public defender you are not required to profess your client's innocence and are here to assist the Defendant with representation. If you have questions, feel free to reach out to other PDs.

 

[NoMoreUno]

I am present, Your Honor.

 

[Muggy21]

I am present, Your Honor.

Present an answer on behalf of Kvalej within 48 Hours.

 

[MJL]

@MJL @DaanBanaan5673 Either clarify your complaints (if applicable) or respond to the objection.

Apologies for the delay. I shall make amendments to clarify that I mean all defendants be considered jointly liable.

 

[gribble19]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

The Plaintiffs move that the Court grant default judgement in Desertstorm49 et al. v. marseywpd and poktizoc against Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc, and in support thereof, respectfully allege:

1. The Court previously denied the Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgement because no deadline for an Answer had been issued. The Court has since ordered the Public Defender to file an Answer to the Complaint on behalf of Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc within 48 hours.
2. The Public Defender has failed to file an Answer to the Complaint within the timeframe ordered by the Court.
3. The Public Defender has likewise failed to notify the Court of any request for an extension or any period of inactivity that would reasonably justify the failure to respond.

Respectfully submitted,
DaanBanaan5673, counsel for the Plaintiffs Desertstorm49, TankBroman1010, Z0OVD and Atrile.

Brief

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honor,

the Defendants within their objection filed to the Complaints specifically requested an extension to the deadline for submitting their answers to these Complaints until 24 hours after the matters brought forward in the objection had been resolved. As such the third point brought forward in Plaintiff's motion is untrue. This is not the first but the second time that a seemingly inaccurate Motion for Default Judgement has been filed against Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc within this proceeding. I assume everyone is trying their best here and I do not see the purpose in these motions for default judgement in a case where all parties are clearly present and wiling to participate in this proceeding, let alone the fact that both motions were based on factually incorrect information. These motions do not achieve anything and simply serve to take everyone's time up which slows down the proceeding, even though this appears to be the opposite of what Plaintiffs are trying to achieve here. The Defendants respectfully request that the Plaintiff be warned to stop filing motions based on falsehoods and would like to ask some understanding from the Plaintiff for the fact that the Public Defender has no ill intentions and is not looking to slow this case down unnecessarily, and hopes that Plaintiffs counsel will attempt to prevent doing so as well.

Thank you.

Your Honor,
with Plaintiff Pin_kx's Complaint now having been amended and all confusion having been cleared up, the Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc once again respectfully request the same extension to the deadline for submitting their answers to these Complaints until 20 hours from now, in line with their previous extension request within the filed objection.
Thank you.

 

[Muggy21]

Brief

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honor,

the Defendants within their objection filed to the Complaints specifically requested an extension to the deadline for submitting their answers to these Complaints until 24 hours after the matters brought forward in the objection had been resolved. As such the third point brought forward in Plaintiff's motion is untrue. This is not the first but the second time that a seemingly inaccurate Motion for Default Judgement has been filed against Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc within this proceeding. I assume everyone is trying their best here and I do not see the purpose in these motions for default judgement in a case where all parties are clearly present and wiling to participate in this proceeding, let alone the fact that both motions were based on factually incorrect information. These motions do not achieve anything and simply serve to take everyone's time up which slows down the proceeding, even though this appears to be the opposite of what Plaintiffs are trying to achieve here. The Defendants respectfully request that the Plaintiff be warned to stop filing motions based on falsehoods and would like to ask some understanding from the Plaintiff for the fact that the Public Defender has no ill intentions and is not looking to slow this case down unnecessarily, and hopes that Plaintiffs counsel will attempt to prevent doing so as well.

Thank you.

Your Honor,
with Plaintiff Pin_kx's Complaint now having been amended and all confusion having been cleared up, the Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc once again respectfully request the same extension to the deadline for submitting their answers to these Complaints until 20 hours from now, in line with their previous extension request within the filed objection.
Thank you.

The Motion for Default Judgement is denied, the Public Defender is active on the case. The deadline extension is granted to Defense.

 

[NoMoreUno]

Present an answer on behalf of Kvalej within 48 Hours.

Response

N THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

desertstorm49 et al
Plaintiff

v.

marseywpd, poktizoc, Kvalej
Defendant


I. Answer to Complaint
(Note: I've taken the liberty of combining the facts in both complaints into one answer)

1. The Defendant AFFIRMS that Pin_kx ("Pink") is resident of Redmont who sought the services of a banking institution.
2. The Defendant AFFIRMS that "Goldman Capital" is the name of a disbanded sole-proprietorship which was led by an unknown individual called "Hatsune Guy".
3. The Defendant AFFIRMS That on 23 June 2026, poktizoc advertised Goldman Capital. He was paid $1,000 for this or other services.
4. The Defendant AFFIRMS poktizoc is the listed owner of ElytraPayments which is used to transfer funds from Goldman Capital.
5. The Defendant AFFIRMS that marseywpd is the name of a new player who was contacted to verify a discord account for pay on behalf of Hatsune Guy.
6. The Defendant AFFIRMS that Kvalej is the identified owner of the Goldman Capital Bank corporate account, and that GoldmanCapitalBank is owned by Kvalej.
7. The Defendant AFFIRMS that on 26 June 2026, Pink deposited $30,000 into a bank account allegedly controlled by Goldman Capital.
8. The Defendant AFFIRMS that on the same day, Pink (through her legal representative) requested her funds be withdrawn from Goldman Capital.
9. The Defendant AFFIRMS that the ticket was closed, Pink's attorney was banned from the Discord server, and no funds were withdrawn.
10. The Defendant AFFIRMS that Plaintiffs have a total of $254,926.89 in funds with GoldmanCapitalBank.
11. The Defendant AFFIRMS that GoldmanCapitalBank is not registered as a Financial Institution with the Department of Commerce.
12. The Defendant AFFIRMS that Defendant marseywpd used “mules” to turn money into ingots.
13. The Defendant AFFIRMS that Customers make a payment to ElytraPayments which get forwarded to GoldmanCapitalBank.
14. The Defendant AFFIRMS that GoldmanCapitalBank is managed by marseywpd.
15. The Defendant AFFIRMS that ElytraPayments is owned by poktizoc.
16. The Defendant AFFIRMS that GoldmanCapitalBank has taken at least $433,392.82 worth of deposits.
17. The Defendant AFFIRMS that poktizoc made a post in #businesses about Goldman Capital Group.
18. The Defendant AFFIRMS that GoldmanCapitalBank has a “Terms & Conditions” page.
19. The Defendant AFFIRMS that marseywpd refuses to withdraw the money of the Plaintiffs.
20. The Defendant AFFIRMS that GoldmanCapitalBank claims to be “FDRC Compliant”.

II. Defense

The first complaint alleges that the Defendants should be charged with Failure to Honour Withdrawal or Redemption, and that "as the defendants acted in organized coordination with one another, it should be found that they be considered jointly liable for damages". While the facts certainly prove that this tort is valid, nothing has been brought forwards implying that Kvalej knew of or participated in this defraudment. The only fact alleged of Kvalej is that they are the owner of Goldman Capital Bank's account, which is in of itself not a crime. The Plaintiff does mention an unknown individual known as 'hatsuneguy', who was allegedly the owner of Goldman Capital. However, hatsuneguy is for all intents and purposes marseywpd, as they operate under that account- the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff demonstrates that marseypwd is either essentially a sockpuppet of or plainly hatsuneguy ("marseywpd is the name of a new player who was contacted to verify a discord account for pay on behalf of Hatsune Guy"). As hatsuneguy was the individual who refused to let the Plaintiff withdraw 30k, they are liable, not Kvalej. Even though all the facts alleged may be true, none of these facts (and for that matter no evidence) actively implicate Kvalej as either an active participant or conspirator.

The Claims for Relief in the second complaint concern themselves solely with the actions of marseywpd (hatsuneguy) and poktizoc. Kvalej is not accused of anything in these Claims, nor are they mentioned. They are not being charged with anything.

Kvalej is almost completely unrelated to this case. They hold the Goldman Bank corporate account, but they took no actions to actively defraud the Plaintiff, as hatsuneguy was the one who failed to honor withdrawl, and no messages supplied imply that Kvalej was in communication or conspirating with hatsuneguy to defraud their investors, which disproves the claim that "the defendants acted in organized coordination with one another". This should be sufficient to prove Kvalej's innocence.


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 9th day of July 2026

 

[Muggy21]

Discovery on all defendants is now open.

Deadline: July 16th, 2026 at 9pm EDT

 

[MJL]

Discovery on all defendants is now open.

Deadline: July 16th, 2026 at 9pm EDT

Your honor, are we not lacking in an answer to complaint here?

 

[Muggy21]

Your honor, are we not lacking in an answer to complaint here?

You're right, discovery is not yet open as we haven't heard from Gribble.

 

[gribble19]

Co-Defendants request a final 10 minute extension to their pending deadline.

 

[gribble19]

Answer to Complaint

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Submitted by Co-Defendants marseywpd and poktizoc

Pin_kx, Desertstorm49, Z0OVD, TankBroman1010, Atrile
Co-Plaintiffs

v.

Goldman Capital, marseywpd, poktizoc, Kvalej
Co-Defendants

I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Co-Defendants AFFIRM that Pin_kx ("Pink") is a resident of Redmont who sought the services of a banking institution.
2. The Co-Defendants DENY that " Goldman Capital" is the name of a disbanded sole-proprietorship which was led by an unknown individual called "Hatsune Guy".
3. The Co-Defendants AFFIRM that on 23 June 2026, poktizoc advertised Goldman Capital and DENY that he was paid $1,000 for this or other services.
4. The Co-Defendants DENY that poktizoc is the listed owner of ElytraPayments and DENY that it is used to transfer funds from Goldman Capital.
5. The Co-Defendants DENY that marseywpd is the name of a new player who was contacted to verify a discord account for pay on behalf of Hatsune Guy.
6. The Co-Defendants AFFIRM that Kvalej is the identified owner of the GoldmanCapitalBank corporate account.
7. The Co-Defendants DENY that on 26 June 2026, Pink deposited $30,000 into a bank account allegedly controlled by Goldman Capital.
8. The Co-Defendants DENY that on the same day, Pink (through her legal representative) requested her funds be withdrawn from Goldman Capital.
9. The Co-Defendants DENY that the ticket was closed, Pink's attorney was banned from the Discord server, and no funds were withdrawn.
10. The Co-Defendants DENY that plaintiffs have a total of $254,926.89 in funds with GoldmanCapitalBank
11. The Co-Defendants AFFIRM that GoldmanCapitalBank is not registered as a Financial Institution with the Department of Commerce
12. The Co-Defendants DENY that defendant marseywpd used “mules” to turn money into ingots.
13. The Co-Defendants DENY that Customers make a payment to ElytraPayments which get forwarded to GoldmanCapitalBank.
14. The Co-Defendants DENY that GoldmanCapitalBank is managed by marseywpd.
15. The Co-Defendants DENY that ElytraPayments is owned by poktizoc.
16. The Co-Defendants DENY that GoldmanCapitalBank has taken at least $433,392.82 worth of deposits.
17. The Co-Defendants AFFIRM that poktizoc made a post in #businesses about Goldman Capital.
18. The Co-Defendants DENY that marseywpd refuses to withdraw the money of the Plaintiffs.
19. The Co-Defendants AFFIRM that the website that allegedly belongs to GoldManCapitalBankk states the term "FDRC" with below that "Redmont Compliance" but DENY that the GoldmanCapitalBank claims to be “FDRC Compliant”.
20. The Co-Defendants AFFIRM that GoldmanCapitalBank is owned by Kvalej.


II. DEFENCES

1. Plaintiffs have not proven on the balance of probabilities that Co-Defendants poktizoc and marseywpd have commited any civil torts.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This twelfth day of July 2026.

 

[Muggy21]

Okay, NOW discovery is open.

Deadline July 17th , 2026 at 9pm EDT.

 

[MJL]

Okay, NOW discovery is open.

Deadline July 17th , 2026 at 9pm EDT.

Your honor.. I hate to do this again, but we have two complaints.

 

[Muggy21]

Your honor.. I hate to do this again, but we have two complaints.

I proceeded because both Defense counsel included all Plaintiffs in response. Your claims from Pin_kx are noted in both Answers.

I know a summons wasn't directed specifically for your Complaint, but if it has been materially answered and Defense hasn't objected to that, I'd like to proceed.

 

[MJL]

I proceeded because both Defense counsel included all Plaintiffs in response. Your claims from Pin_kx are noted in both Answers.

I know a summons wasn't directed specifically for your Complaint, but if it has been materially answered and Defense hasn't objected to that, I'd like to proceed.

Sounds good, sorry then.

 

[NoMoreUno]

The Defense for Kvalej consents to end Discovery early, should the other two counsels wish the same.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

My clients do not consent, too many facts are still in dispute.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

EVIDENCE SUBMISSION
The Plaintiffs enters the Exhibits attached below into evidence to support fact 6 in the Case Filing (fact 4 in the Answer to Complaint filed by Gribble19).

Spoiler: Exhibit S

Additionaly, the Plaintiffs would like to submit internal logs of ElytraPayments showing that the payments are being forward to GoldmanCapitalBank. Unfortunately, posting the exhibits here could possibly violate the privacy of other depositors. As such, the Plaintiffs request to be able to submit two exhibits in Closed Court.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

In light of rule 4.6 the Plaintiffs would like to strike Exhibit S from Evidence and submit Exhibit P-001 attached below instead. The Plaintiffs' request for Closed Court stands.

Spoiler: Exhibit P-001

 

[MJL]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

The Co-Plaintiff hereby submits the following requests to the Co-Defendants poktizoc and marseywpd pursuant to the Court's Discovery Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories). All responses are required within 48 hours. Objections must be raised within 24 hours.

Interrogatories
A. Is marseywpd the same individual as Hatsune Guy?

B. What relationship did either of the co-defendants (poktizoc and marseywpd) have with Kvalej?

C. Do they have any information as to where the money sent to Goldman went if it was not money mules? This question is being asked because these Co-Defendants choose to deny the claims in the answer to the complaints.

D. Why did poktizoc choose to advertise for Goldman Capital if not for pay?

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

Evidence

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
SUBMISSION OF INTERROGATORIES

Your Honour,
Plaintiffs submit the following interrogatories to the Co-Defendants poktizoc and marseywpd:
1. Regarding the Co-Defendants' denial of fact 10 in their Answer to Complaint, please state whether the denied amount of $254,926.89 refers solely to the funds alleged to belong to my clients, or whether it includes the funds alleged to belong to Pin_kx as well.

The Plaintiffs reserve their right to ask more interrogatories later totalling up to 5 interrogatories.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

EVIDENCE SUBMISSIONS
The Plaintiffs enters the Exhibits attached below into evidence to support fact 6 in the Case Filing (fact 14 in the Answer to Complaint filed by Gribble19).

Spoiler: Exhibit P-002

Spoiler: Exhibit P-003

Spoiler: Exhibit P-004

Spoiler: Exhibit P-005

Spoiler: Exhibit P-006

 

[Muggy21]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL

The Co-Plaintiff hereby submits the following requests to the Co-Defendants poktizoc and marseywpd pursuant to the Court's Discovery Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories). All responses are required within 48 hours. Objections must be raised within 24 hours.

Interrogatories
A. Is marseywpd the same individual as Hatsune Guy?

B. What relationship did either of the co-defendants (poktizoc and marseywpd) have with Kvalej?

C. Do they have any information as to where the money sent to Goldman went if it was not money mules? This question is being asked because these Co-Defendants choose to deny the claims in the answer to the complaints.

D. Why did poktizoc choose to advertise for Goldman Capital if not for pay?

Granted, insofar as it is recognized that counselors are public defenders and will not be held liable for their inability to confirm this if unable to reach defendents.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs move that the Court grant the following amendment to the complaint:

Under section 2 (“Facts”):
7. GoldmanCapitalBank has taken at least $433,392.82 worth of deposits (Exhibit J).


Where the strikethrough text is removed. The Plaintiffs would like to amend their filing as even if they are able to proof the fact on a balance of probabilities, they no longer see the value of the fact for their case.

Respectfully submitted,
DaanBanaan5673, counsel for the Plaintiffs Desertstorm49, TankBroman1010, Z0OVD, Atrile.

 

[Muggy21]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs move that the Court grant the following amendment to the complaint:

Under section 2 (“Facts”):
7. GoldmanCapitalBank has taken at least $433,392.82 worth of deposits (Exhibit J).


Where the strikethrough text is removed. The Plaintiffs would like to amend their filing as even if they are able to proof the fact on a balance of probabilities, they no longer see the value of the fact for their case.

Respectfully submitted,
DaanBanaan5673, counsel for the Plaintiffs Desertstorm49, TankBroman1010, Z0OVD, Atrile.

DENIED

Rule 3.5 (Amendment Exception)​

Amendments to an Answer or Complaint cannot change information that was already submitted.

 

[DaanBanaan5673]

Your Honour, I understand that the Court is on administrative leave, but considering I wish to submit motions based on the Exhibits I intend on presenting in Closed Court, may we receive a ruling on the request for Closed Court after the leave?

Furthermore, the Plaintiffs respectfully request a 48-hour extension of the Discovery period, as this case concerns two different Case Filings and Answers to Complaint. Additionally, as I am currently on vacation, I am unable to submit the necessary exhibits with less than 24 hours left.

 

[Muggy21]

Your Honour, I understand that the Court is on administrative leave, but considering I wish to submit motions based on the Exhibits I intend on presenting in Closed Court, may we receive a ruling on the request for Closed Court after the leave?

Furthermore, the Plaintiffs respectfully request a 48-hour extension of the Discovery period, as this case concerns two different Case Filings and Answers to Complaint. Additionally, as I am currently on vacation, I am unable to submit the necessary exhibits with less than 24 hours left.

Discovery is extended to 48 Hours AFTER the cessation of the Federal Court's strike.

The Closed Court session is granted, I'll make a closed court thread. Check your forums DMs for invites to the Judiciary discord.