- Joined
- Jan 3, 2025
- Messages
- 13
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Laygoes (represented by Talion & Partners INC)
Plaintiff
v.
Zombie_bro_
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. Laygoes (Plaintiff)
2. Zombie_bro_ (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. On April 19, 2026(P-004), the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a written agreement. (P-001) recorded in an autographed book. In this book, the Plaintiff agreed to lend the Defendant a drill until 21:00 BST on the same day. (which ever exhibit that shows zombie bro agreeing to the date)
2. The contract was authored by the Defendant and autographed by the Plaintiff. (P-002)
3. The contract explicitly states that failure to return the golden drill as agreed will constitute a material breach of the contract, and the Defendant will be responsible for the full replacement cost and a $5,000 compensation fee for consulting loss and administrative costs.
4. The Defendant lost the drill during the rental period.
5. Following the breach, the Plaintiff gave the Defendant one week to pay restitution, totaling $20,000: $5,000 as the compensation fee and $15,000 as the full replacement cost, representing the value of the drill lost. (P-003)
6. The one-week period has elapsed, and the Defendant failed to make any payments.
7. The current balance (as of 9:44 AM CET 12 May 2026) of the defendant is $19.5. (P-005)
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract: The defendant committed a strict Liability violation under the Redmont Civil Code Act (RCCA) Part VI, Section 1, by failing to perform their obligation to return the golden drill by 21:00 BST on April, 19, 2026.
2. Failure to deliver goods and services: The defendant committed a strict Liability violation under RCCA Part VI, Section 4. By losing the drill and failure to return it to the Plaintiff, the defendant failed to deliver property that they were contractually obligated to, upon the conclusion of the rental period.
3. Damage to Property: The defendant committed a Negligent violation under RCCA Part VII, Section 1. By losing the drill while it was under their exclusive control, the defendant failed to exercise the standard of care required, resulting in the total loss of the Plaintiff’s property.
4. Nuisance: The defendant committed a Negligent violation under RCCA Part VII, Section 6. The continued failure to return the drill or pay for its replacement constitutes a substantial and unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of their own property, which is offensive to a reasonable person in the Plaintiffs' position.
5. Compensatory Damages: Following the breach of contract, the Defendant acknowledged the circumstances of the contract and agreed to a one-week repayment period. Having failed to pay within that period, the Defendant is, under RCCA Part III, Section 2, additionally liable to pay the replacement fee of $15,000.
6. The Plaintiff seeks punitive damages under RCCA Part III, Section 3. The conduct of the Defendant represented a grossly negligent disregard for the Plaintiffs' property. Losing a high value item and failure to provide any compensation despite acknowledging the debt represented a significant distance from acceptable standards of behavior.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Compensatory Damages in the amount of $20,000, representing the administrative costs fee of $5,000 and the replacement fee for the golden drill of $15,000.
2. Punitive Damages: $20,000 for the defendants grossly negligent disregard of the Plainliffs’ property.
3.Failure to deliver goods and services: $20,000 for the strict liablility violation, by losing the drill and failure to return it to the Plainliff.
4. Legal fees equal to 30% of the case value, paid to Talion & Partners INC, as authorized in RCCA Part III, Section 7.
60,000$ + 18,000$ which totals up to 78,000$.
V. EVIDENCE
VI. APPENDIX
1. Establishment of a Valid Contract: The Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a valid, enforceable contract, as defined by Section 4 of the Contracts Act. The essential components were met as follows:
- Offer: The written agreement in the autographed book expressed a clear willingness to enter a rental agreement for a golden drill.
- Agreement: Both parties signed/autographed the book, agreeing to the terms of the rental.
- Consideration: There was an exchange of value: the plaintiff provided the use of the golden drill, and the Defendant agreed to pay a $20/hour leasing fee.
- Intent: The detailed written terms regarding breaches and fees demonstrated the clear intention to create legal obligations.
- Capacity: Both parties possessed the legal capacity to enter the agreement.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 12th day of May 2026
