- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
- Messages
- 200
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
FriedPotaters
Plaintiff
v.
Lord_Doniticus
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The defendant lord_donuticus has set out on a mission to stop terrorism, but he has been doing this by falsely creating stories about the plaintiff, he has defamed and slandered the name of the plaintiff and has created libel, he refuses to acknowledge the damage he is causing on the plaintiff. Will the plaintiff always be known as a terrorist by the defendant? Is he above the law and is able of accusing players of such acts? Is it up to him when a player is or isn't a terrorist anymore? When does it end, and when will this player be held responsible for acting above the law and creating libel?
I. PARTIES
1. FriedPotaters
2. Lord_donuticus
II. FACTS
1. Defendant makes false claims about the plaintiff attacking a DRP rally which is untrue.
2. Defendant claims the plaintiff has admitted to being in some sort of terrorist group which is untrue.
3. Defendant continuously refers to the plaintiff as a terrorist which is untrue.
4. Defendant falsely claims the plaintiff threatened to sue a candidate he falsely claims the plaintiff attacked because they reported the plaintiff to the police, which is untrue.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant claiming the plaintiff attacked the DRP rally is untrue and if it were true, would there not be coroners reports on the plaintiff murdering people, arrests on the plaintiff, and evidence of the plaintiff attending the rally other than hearsay and rumors?
2. The defendant claiming the plaintiff is or was apart of "The Terrorists" by saying "The Terrorists, which the Defendant clearly admits to being a part of" never have I admitted to anyone that I am apart of a group of terrorists nor affiliated in any way. Who is "The Terrorists" he is referring to, what is their name, who was involved, and where is proof of me admitting I am with "The Terrorists"? He also edits out the part when I spoke wrongly of him when I said "but we will stand against him" referring to the good hearted people who are against terrorism, it was a joke but is being used out of context by the Defendant in court.
3. The Defendant on multiple occasions and even during trial has referred to "FriedPotaters" as a terrorist when I have spoken to him and have told him I am not a terrorist, he wishes to cause libel and he knows I am not a terrorist as I can provide evidence of me telling him I am not a terrorist on previous occasions, I have also not been charged with terrorism nor ever claimed to be a terrorist, I may have committed crimes in the past but this does not give anyone the right to accuse someone of terrorism.
4. Defendant falsely claiming the plaintiff is threatening to sue a candidate for speaking to the police, this is untrue and the reason behind me speaking and threatening to sue the candidate is for providing false stories to the police which itself is libel and slander. I had spoken to the candidate and told him if he continues to spread false truths, I would be suing him. I would never threaten to sue someone for speaking to the police as it is their right to do such an act, but they must be truthful and honest when doing so otherwise it can hurt others reputations. The candidate has since stopped and no issues have arise since then.
5. The Defendant has on many occasions tried to cause issues as he has a grudge as we do not see eye to eye on many of his terrorist bill plans or other political agendas, so he refers to me as a terrorist and creates false stories and feeds off of rumors to publish hateful rhetoric against the plaintiff, this has hurt my reputation greatly and I cannot even find a lawyer or mingle with certain players as some fear representing someone another lawyer has claimed to be a terrorist and also claims committed an attack on the DRP rally. None of this has been proven and lord_donuticus to this day falsely accuses me of this acts in public. I have lost countless business opportunities and have seen a decline in sales since the defendant started accusing me of these things. He is not apart of the DoJ nor has any credibility when it comes to accusing someone of terrorism, but he feels as if he is the law in these situations and hammers them down peoples throats if they disagree.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The defendant to make a public retraction of their statements and stop all forms accusing players of terrorism unless the player openly claims to be one.
2. $5000 in damages, as I have lost business, players choose to not associate with me due to these claims and I have been emotionally stressed as he continues to refer to me as a terrorist as he has created libel and slander.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This (09) day of (03) (2021)
CIVIL ACTION
FriedPotaters
Plaintiff
v.
Lord_Doniticus
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
The defendant lord_donuticus has set out on a mission to stop terrorism, but he has been doing this by falsely creating stories about the plaintiff, he has defamed and slandered the name of the plaintiff and has created libel, he refuses to acknowledge the damage he is causing on the plaintiff. Will the plaintiff always be known as a terrorist by the defendant? Is he above the law and is able of accusing players of such acts? Is it up to him when a player is or isn't a terrorist anymore? When does it end, and when will this player be held responsible for acting above the law and creating libel?
I. PARTIES
1. FriedPotaters
2. Lord_donuticus
II. FACTS
1. Defendant makes false claims about the plaintiff attacking a DRP rally which is untrue.
2. Defendant claims the plaintiff has admitted to being in some sort of terrorist group which is untrue.
3. Defendant continuously refers to the plaintiff as a terrorist which is untrue.
4. Defendant falsely claims the plaintiff threatened to sue a candidate he falsely claims the plaintiff attacked because they reported the plaintiff to the police, which is untrue.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The defendant claiming the plaintiff attacked the DRP rally is untrue and if it were true, would there not be coroners reports on the plaintiff murdering people, arrests on the plaintiff, and evidence of the plaintiff attending the rally other than hearsay and rumors?
2. The defendant claiming the plaintiff is or was apart of "The Terrorists" by saying "The Terrorists, which the Defendant clearly admits to being a part of" never have I admitted to anyone that I am apart of a group of terrorists nor affiliated in any way. Who is "The Terrorists" he is referring to, what is their name, who was involved, and where is proof of me admitting I am with "The Terrorists"? He also edits out the part when I spoke wrongly of him when I said "but we will stand against him" referring to the good hearted people who are against terrorism, it was a joke but is being used out of context by the Defendant in court.
3. The Defendant on multiple occasions and even during trial has referred to "FriedPotaters" as a terrorist when I have spoken to him and have told him I am not a terrorist, he wishes to cause libel and he knows I am not a terrorist as I can provide evidence of me telling him I am not a terrorist on previous occasions, I have also not been charged with terrorism nor ever claimed to be a terrorist, I may have committed crimes in the past but this does not give anyone the right to accuse someone of terrorism.
4. Defendant falsely claiming the plaintiff is threatening to sue a candidate for speaking to the police, this is untrue and the reason behind me speaking and threatening to sue the candidate is for providing false stories to the police which itself is libel and slander. I had spoken to the candidate and told him if he continues to spread false truths, I would be suing him. I would never threaten to sue someone for speaking to the police as it is their right to do such an act, but they must be truthful and honest when doing so otherwise it can hurt others reputations. The candidate has since stopped and no issues have arise since then.
5. The Defendant has on many occasions tried to cause issues as he has a grudge as we do not see eye to eye on many of his terrorist bill plans or other political agendas, so he refers to me as a terrorist and creates false stories and feeds off of rumors to publish hateful rhetoric against the plaintiff, this has hurt my reputation greatly and I cannot even find a lawyer or mingle with certain players as some fear representing someone another lawyer has claimed to be a terrorist and also claims committed an attack on the DRP rally. None of this has been proven and lord_donuticus to this day falsely accuses me of this acts in public. I have lost countless business opportunities and have seen a decline in sales since the defendant started accusing me of these things. He is not apart of the DoJ nor has any credibility when it comes to accusing someone of terrorism, but he feels as if he is the law in these situations and hammers them down peoples throats if they disagree.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The defendant to make a public retraction of their statements and stop all forms accusing players of terrorism unless the player openly claims to be one.
2. $5000 in damages, as I have lost business, players choose to not associate with me due to these claims and I have been emotionally stressed as he continues to refer to me as a terrorist as he has created libel and slander.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This (09) day of (03) (2021)
Last edited: