Lawsuit: Dismissed Alta Group Corporation V. Aesyr_

[12700k]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Alta Group Corporation
Plaintiff

v.

Aesyr_
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On the 1st of October 2025, the Plaintiff entered into an investment contract with the Defendant. The Defendant then later admitted to embezzling the funds, stating, “its long and gone” and “poof”, doesn’t exist anymore.” The Defendant did not follow through with the agreement made in the contract, which guaranteed the Plaintiff a 20% fixed return on the Principal, of which $1,000,000 was invested.

I. PARTIES
1. Alta Group Corporation - Plaintiff
2. 12700k - Owner/CEO of Alta Group Corporation
3. Aesyr_ - Defendant

II. FACTS
1. Plaintiff and Defendant entered into an investment contract on the 1st day of October 2025. (See P-003)
2. The Plaintiff made this agreement with Tape Capital Asset Management, a sole proprietorship owned by Aesyr_, at the time of signing. (P-004)
3. Tape Capital Asset Management was registered only as an in-game company and was never incorporated as a Corporation or LLC with the DOC, making it a sole proprietorship under Section 9 of the Legal Entity Act.
4. The contract guaranteed a 20% fixed return on Principal, at the date of maturity. (See: P-003)
5. The Principal amount was $1,000,000. (See: P-003)
6. Defendant was permanently deported and banned from the server on the 28th of October 2025 due to the use of alternative accounts, following the sale of TCAM. (See: P-005)
7. On the 29th of October 2025, the Plaintiff sent a Discord message to the Defendant asking where the funds were. (See P-001 and P-002)
8. The Defendant stated “its long and gone”, “poof”, “doesnt exist anymore”, “you'll prolly never see it again since im perma banned lol” (See: P-001 and P-002)
9. Section 9(3) of the Legal Entity Act states: “All assets and liabilities of the sole proprietorship shall be regarded as assets and liabilities of the owner of the sole proprietorship”
10. The Defendant - Aesyr_ - is personally liable for all obligations under the investment contract.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Breach of Contract
Pursuant to Section 7 of the Contracts Act, a breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations. The Defendant entered into an investment contract with the Plaintiff on 1st October 2025, with a Maturity Date of 1st November 2025. Under Section 2.2 of the agreement, the Defendant was obligated to pay $1,200,000 on or before the Maturity Date, representing the $1,000,000 Principal, plus $200,000 in Guaranteed Return.

The Defendant failed to make this payment and instead admitted the funds were “long and gone” and the Plaintiff would “prolly never see it again”. This constitutes a material breach under Section 4.1 of the agreement, entitling the Plaintiff to Remedies under Section 4.2, including full recovery of Principal and Guaranteed Return, legal costs and Punitive damages.

2. Embezzlement
Under Part VII, Section 6 of the Criminal Code Act, embezzlement occurs when a person “fraudulently and knowingly misappropriates assets that have been entrusted to them, or have lawfully come into their possession by virtue of office, employment, or position of trust.” The Plaintiff entrusted $1,000,000 to the Defendant under the investment contract for the specific purpose of investment management, as shown in Section 1.2 of the agreement. The Defendant fraudulently misappropriated these funds, admitting they no longer exist and cannot be returned.

3. Fraud
Under Part VII, Section 7 of the Criminal Code Act, fraud occurs when a person: “knowingly or recklessly misrepresents or omits a material fact to another, causing the other party to rely on that misrepresentation, resulting in actual, quantifiable harm.” The Defendant represented in Section 5.2 of the agreement that he had “full capacity to invest and manage the Investor’s funds” and guaranteed in Section 1.3 a fixed 20% return on Principal. The Plaintiff reasonably relied on these material representations by investing $1,000,000. The Defendant’s subsequent admission that the funds are “long and gone” and “doesnt exist anymore” demonstrates that these representations were false at the time they were made or that the Defendant recklessly disregarded their ability to fulfil them. This fraudulent misrepresentation resulted in actual, quantifiable harm of $1,200,000 to the Plaintiff.

As stated in Section 6(1)(a) of the Criminal Code Act, crimes may be used to seek damages in civil lawsuits without requiring a criminal conviction. The Defendant’s conduct satisfies all elements of embezzlement and fraud, and warrants both compensatory and punitive damages

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff respectfully seeks the following:
1. Compensatory damages of $1,000,000 to make up for the loss of principal.
2. Compensatory damages of $200,000 to make up for the loss of interest.
3. Punitive damages of $100,000 for the outrageous conduct of the Defendant’s actions, and the amount misappropriated from the Plaintiff.
4. Legal fees totalling 30% of the damages paid out from the case.

EVIDENCE

Spoiler: P-001

Spoiler: P-002

Spoiler: P-003

PRIVATE INVESTMENT AGREEMENT - TCAM (Aesyr_ + Alta Group).pdf

drive.google.com

Spoiler: P-004

Spoiler: P-005

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 29th day of October 2025

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT

Your Honour,

It has been held in numerous previous cases, such as [2022] FCR 52, [2023] FCR 11, [2024] FCR 101, [2025] SCR 2, [2025] DCR 41, that deported players do not retain the right to defend themselves in court. Therefore, the Plaintiff requests that this go to default judgment.

 

[12700k]

​

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your Honour:

The Plaintiff will be irreparably harmed if the funds are transferred to third parties or made irrecoverable. In previous cases, such as The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Westray & Partypig678[2022] FCR 47, the court has authorised the freezing of the Defendant's assets during ongoing litigation to preserve the ability to collect damages. As the Defendant is permanently deported, there is no risk of undue harm to or violation of the Defendant's rights; as the Supreme Court has noted, "deported players have no rights" (UnityMaster v. lcn[2025] SCR 2).

Therefore, to prevent irreparable harm to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff asks for the court to freeze the following assets and prevent their transfer to any third party until the conclusion of this case:

1. Any funds present within the in-game balances of Aesyr_ or any other alternative accounts thereof;
2. Any real property directly owned or beneficially owned by Aesyr_ or any other alternative accounts thereof;
3. Any other assets of Aesyr_ or any other alternative accounts thereof, including but not limited to:
   1. Pre-paid leases or rental rights;
   2. Bank accounts at Citadel, Fishs Bank, Cobblestone Bank, RVR, or any other bank;
   3. Financial accounts at NER, or any other non-bank financial institution;
   4. Stock warrants, rights, or options owned;
   5. Accounts receivable;
   6. Membership, shares held, or any other ownership rights in any business;
   7. Inventory, cash balances, and/or assets present in any non-registered business owned;
   8. Property held in any Vault;
   9. Property held in any chest, barrel, ender chest, item frame, or other locked storage container or locked item;
   10. Automotive, aviation, or other vehicle assets;
   11. Intellectual Property, such as trademarks or copyrights;
   12. Beneficial ownership in any trust.

 

[BrownBerry]

Your Honor,

I understand that the case has not yet been called, but the deportation of the Defendant is a special circumstance. I seek the Court's permission to make an amicus brief on the appropriateness of punitive damages and legal fees in these deportation-default cases.

 

[ElysiaCrynn]

Your Honour, as the Secretary of the Department of Commerce, who have been investigating the financial assets and behaviour of Tape Capital Asset Management and Aesyr_, I would like to submit an amicus brief in regards to the validity of the investment agreement that warrant consideration before decisions are made for this case.

 

[Franciscus]

Your Honor,

I, Speaker of the House, would respectfully request to submit an Amicus Brief on behalf of the Office of the Speaker.

 

[12700k]

​

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI

The Plaintiff wishes to drop this lawsuit and asks that it be dismissed without prejudice, so it may be filed at a later date.

 

[AmityBlamity]

​

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI

The Plaintiff wishes to drop this lawsuit and asks that it be dismissed without prejudice, so it may be filed at a later date.

Granted. Case dismissed without prejudice.