Lawsuit: Pending Plura72 v. The Department of Construction and Transportation [2025] DCR 80

[Plura72]

Motion

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUCTION

Earlier today, the Commonwealth unlawfully seized plot c600 from the Plaintiff (Exhibit P-001). The Plaintiff seeks to challenge this seizure on the grounds of procedural errors committed by the Department of Construction & Transportation, as well as violations of the Plaintiff’s constitutional rights.

Following such seizures, the Commonwealth has a pattern of hastily auctioning off the properties in question. Because any sale at auction would make recovery of the property significantly more difficult and the loss of the property would deprive the Plaintiff of its continued use and enjoyment—the Commonwealth’s conduct poses an immediate and irreparable threat of harm to the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court immediately enjoin and freeze any auctions, sales, transfers, or other transactions involving plot c600 for the duration of this case.

Should the Commonwealth sell or transfer the property on or after 12 October 2025 and before a ruling is issued on this injunction, the Plaintiff further asks that the Court order the sale or transfer to be fully rescinded and that the property be placed in escrow pending resolution of this case.

Spoiler: P-001

suit will soon be posted under this same thread.

 

[Muggy21]

Motion

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUCTION

Earlier today, the Commonwealth unlawfully seized plot c600 from the Plaintiff (Exhibit P-001). The Plaintiff seeks to challenge this seizure on the grounds of procedural errors committed by the Department of Construction & Transportation, as well as violations of the Plaintiff’s constitutional rights.

Following such seizures, the Commonwealth has a pattern of hastily auctioning off the properties in question. Because any sale at auction would make recovery of the property significantly more difficult and the loss of the property would deprive the Plaintiff of its continued use and enjoyment—the Commonwealth’s conduct poses an immediate and irreparable threat of harm to the Plaintiff.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court immediately enjoin and freeze any auctions, sales, transfers, or other transactions involving plot c600 for the duration of this case.

Should the Commonwealth sell or transfer the property on or after 12 October 2025 and before a ruling is issued on this injunction, the Plaintiff further asks that the Court order the sale or transfer to be fully rescinded and that the property be placed in escrow pending resolution of this case.

Spoiler: P-001

View attachment 64005

suit will soon be posted under this same thread.

Granted, the Government is enjoined from auctioning or otherwise transferring the property during this case.

 

[Muggy21]

@Plura72 You have 72 hours to produce your Complaint.

 

[Muggy21]

Writ of Summons

@asexualdinosaur is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Plura72 v. The Department of Construction and Transportation [2025] DCR 80

In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48 hours.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[asexualdinosaur]

@Plura72 You have 72 hours to produce your Complaint.

Your honor,

Per the Judicial Standards Act - The plaintiff is required to produce a lawsuit within 4 hours of filing an EI - This has not been done, and thus the EI should be considered "null and void" per §18.1.b

Further, I'm unsure why I've been summoned to a case that does not have a pending suit and only contains what should be a null and void suit at this point -- Which is now a little over 2 hours past the deadline set by legislation.

 

[Muggy21]

Your honor,

Per the Judicial Standards Act - The plaintiff is required to produce a lawsuit within 4 hours of filing an EI - This has not been done, and thus the EI should be considered "null and void" per §18.1.b

Further, I'm unsure why I've been summoned to a case that does not have a pending suit and only contains what should be a null and void suit at this point -- Which is now a little over 2 hours past the deadline set by legislation.

The Court's internet has been crap this weekend, so when I received an email notification, I blindly thought a Complaint was added.

Apologies. @Plura72 Where is the complaint?