Rookieblue14
Citizen
Homeland Security Department
Justice Department
Construction & Transport Department
Interior Department
Supporter
Change Maker
Rookieblue14
Recruit
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2025
- Messages
- 734
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Anthony_org
Plaintiff
v.
Culls
Defendant
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
I. PARTIES
1. Anthony_org - Plaintiff
2. Culls - Defendant
II. FACTS
1. On August 19th, 2025 Culls in the DC General chat accused Anthony_org of blackmailing him. Anthony_org demanded evidence of the alleged blackmailing, which Culls stated he was going to post on the forums in the form of a lawsuit (Exhibit P-001 and P-002).
2. On the same day Culls filed Culls v. Anthony_org [2025] DCR 63 alleging Anthony_org extorted and threatened Culls.
In his filing, Culls cited Part V, Section 4 - Threats of the Criminal Code Act under his claim for relief.
3. Part V, Section 4 - Threats states, “(a) verbally threatens another player with communication to cause fear or force action.”
4. In his filing, Culls states, "I believe that I have been scared by these threats".
5. In the evidence submitted in Culls v. Anthony_org [2025] DCR 63, Culls provided a screenshot asking Culls to show proof of ownership or he would sue for false advertising.
6. While the case was in progress Culls stated in the DC general chat, “Show proof or ill sue you for illegal advertising”, “thats blacmail” “i wont win” “but idc” (Exhibit P-003).
7. While the case was in progress Culls stated in the DC general chat in response to Anthony_org telling him that he was suing him for criminal law in a civil case, “because im bored” (Exhibit P-004).
8. On August 22nd, 2025 an MZLD attorney, representing Anthony_org in the case, filed a response to Culls' filing, in addition to several objections to include perjury and breach of procedure.
9. On the same day Culls then filed a motion of Nolle Prosequi citing a lack of evidence.
10. After dismissing the case, Cull stated in the DC General chat, “i reported you to dhs anthony”, and in reply to for what by other players in the General chat, elaborated, “extorntion” “(blackmail)” (Exhibit P-005).
11. On September 5th, 2025 a short time after this Complaint was filed, the Defendant made the following statements in the #Global channel of the DC Discord: "DAMN IT ANTHONY" "takes a joke to serousy" "ima object this rubish" "no" "This does not seem relavant" "any of this evidence" "IMA LOSE EVERYTHING". (Exhibit P-007)
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Frivolous Court Case. Under Part III, Section 4 - Frivolous Court Case of the Criminal Code Act, a Frivolous Court Case is one in which one, “lodges a legal case that has no serious purpose or value”. Based on Culls admission of having a lack of evidence to pursue this case, acknowledging that he was unlikely to win the case, and had filed the case because he was bored, Cull pursued a frivolous court case. In addition, Culls stated in his initial filing, “I believe that I have been scared by these threats”. Under the reasonable person test, no reasonable person would be in fear or forced to take action when told to provide proof of ownership of property. The result of this was the Plaintiff forced to obtain legal representation to defend himself in the case, resulting in $800 in damages (Exhibit P-006). Under Part I, Section 6, Subsection 1 - Civil Damages crimes may be used to seek damages in civil suits.
2. Libel. Under the No More Defamation Act Defamation is defined as, “Defamation is a false statement and/or communication that injures a third party's reputation. The tort of defamation includes both libel and slander”. In the same act Libel is defined as, “A method of defamation expressed by documents, signs, published media, or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person's reputation, exposes a person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or injures a person in his/her business, profession or organization”. Under the same act, damages caused by defamation, if proven in a civil court of law, shall be paid out as determined by the presiding Judicial Officer. Through the suit Culls filed, Culls v. Anthony_org [2025] DCR 63, Cull made a court filing, generating a document, accusing Anthony_org of engaging in criminal conduct without providing evidence to support said accusation. Additionally, the evidence Cull did provide shows speech which was not threatening and fails the reasonable person test to be threatening. This unsupported allegation is now tied to Anthony_org’s name in perpetuity and will be unearthed anytime someone searches his name on the forums.
3. Slander. Under the No More Defamation Act Slander is defined as A false statement, usually made through either discord or in-game messages, which defames another person’s reputation, business, profession, or organization. Culls on several occasions accused Anthony_org of blackmail and extorting him through messages sent in the DC general chat. This allegation, unsupported by any evidence, harmed Anthony_org’s reputation and was seen and engaged with by multiple people as seen in Exhibit-P001, Exhibit P-003, and Exhibit P-005.. Additionally, Culls admitted to filing the suit simply because he was bored as shown in P-004.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Public Apology. As authorized by the No More Defamation Act, we request the Defendant be made to issue a public apology regarding his libelous and slanderous statements. We request said apology be made in the DC Discord General chat while Anthony_org is also online.
2. Compensatory Damages. As authorized by the Legal Damages Act, we request $800 in compensatory damages in the cost incurred by Anthony_org by having to obtain legal representation to defend himself against the frivolous lawsuit.
3. Defamation Damages. As authorized by the No More Defamation Act, we request $10,000 for the humiliation suffered by Anthony_org through the initial court case and statements made by Culls in game.
4. Legal Damages. As authorized by the Legal Damages Act we request damages amounting to 30% of the total case value (Awarded to Mezimori Legal Department).
V. EXHIBITS
INDIVIDUAL SERVICE FEE AGREEMENT
INDIVIDUAL SERVICE FEE AGREEMENT 1. INTRODUCTION AND PARTIES This Individual Service Fee Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of the date of acceptance by the Client and is between: MEZIMORI LEGAL DEPARTMENT ("MZLD"), a Legal Cooperative classification company operating under both the Const...
docs.google.com
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 5th day of September, 2025
Last edited:
