Lawsuit: Pending Commonwealth of Redmont v. Gregg [2025] FCR 64

AmityBlamity

Citizen
Magistrate
Aventura Resident
Popular in the Polls Legal Eagle 5th Anniversary
AmityBlamity
AmityBlamity
Magistrate
Joined
Jan 4, 2025
Messages
87

Case Filing


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Gregg
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:

On or about the 25th of March, our democracy suffered a crippling blow. v__d's terrorist forces, under the command of lukeyyyMC_, stormed the Capitol building. In the face of these treasonous attackers, Gregg decided to ignore his ONLY DUTY (that being to defend the Capitol), and instead allowed the rioters to seize control of the building. He is a disgrace, and must face punishment for his treasonous actions.

I. PARTIES
1. Commonwealth of Redmont (represented by AmityBlamity)
2. Gregg

II. FACTS
1. On or about the 25th of March, terrorists attacked the capitol building.
2. Gregg watched the terrorists attack the building, and did nothing to stop them.
3. Gregg allowed Redmont to briefly fall to these terrorists, and made no efforts to call for help or attempt to stop their actions in any way.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. One count of Treason - We believe that Gregg betrayed the Constitution and the very people he swore to defend. Treason is an appropriate punishment.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. On the one count of Treason, the maximum charge of 250 Penalty Units ($25,000), and 2 months disqualification from office.
2. We also ask that the court fire Gregg from his position, and appoint a superior candidate in his place.

P-001: Footage of Capitol being stormed

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This twenty-fifth day of June, 2025.

 
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION


We request that this Court move to suspend Gregg from his position for the duration of this court case. Due to Gregg's ineptitude and clear disdain for the Commonwealth, it is clear he can no longer be trusted.
 

Writ of Summons


@Gregg is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Gregg [2025] FCR 64

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION


We request that this Court move to suspend Gregg from his position for the duration of this court case. Due to Gregg's ineptitude and clear disdain for the Commonwealth, it is clear he can no longer be trusted.
Granted. Gregg will be put on paid (if he even does get paid) suspension for the duration of this case.
 
Present.

Writ of Summons


@Gregg is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Gregg [2025] FCR 64

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 
May I file an amicus brief, as a Captain of the police force?
 
Per the Marriage Act, seeing as Gregg has accrued no active playtime in the past 7 days, and seeing as I am lawfully married to my sweet little pookie, I will be representing him in absentia.
 
Per the Marriage Act, seeing as Gregg has accrued no active playtime in the past 7 days, and seeing as I am lawfully married to my sweet little pookie, I will be representing him in absentia.
You have 48 hours to provide an answer to complaint
 
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Gregg
Defendant

I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. The defense pleas not guilty to one count of treason

II. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The defense affirms that terrorists attacked the capitol
2. The defense disputes that Gregg watched idly
3. The defense disputes that Gregg did not call for backup

III. DEFENCES
1. Gregg did not want to put his life in danger, especially after already being threatened, knowing that there was no life being threatened inside, and that the terrorist attacks would not provide any structural damage
2. Gregg called for backup, however one of the terrorists, who is also an officer, lukeyyymc_, disrupted his radio transmission, rendering it ineffective both then and for future attempts

Witnesses being called are:
xEndeavore
Teknofried
Strafe Tram
Masked captain person

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This Gregg day
 
We will now be entering discovery. Discovery will last 5 days starting now.
 
Interrogation for the prosecution:
1. Would you kill yourself just to respond to some rapscallions with no noses who will do no actual damage to life or property?
 
Back
Top