Lawsuit: Pending Two Guys Realty v. Slow_samitch [2026] DCR 125

[exclusiv3z]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


Two Guys Realty
Plaintiff

v.

Slow_samitch
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

On May 31, 2026, Two Guys Realty entered into a mortgage contract with the Defendant, regarding the financing of Plot C634. The agreement established that the Defendant would receive a loan of $32,000 from Two Guys Realty to purchase the property, with a three-month payment schedule provided alongside the loan. C634 would be utilised as collateral during this period. The first payment was due on June 30, 2026, and was not delivered. Four days later, the property was placed under eviction for inactivity. On July 6, 2026, Two Guys Realty reached out to the buyer, notifying them of their default, starting a seven-day cure period. No response was provided. The property has since been evicted.

The Defendant has failed to satisfy their obligations under the loan agreement and ultimately lost the collateral as a result of their inactivity. The Plaintiff is seeking relief for the financial harm experienced due to the violation of the agreement.

I. PARTIES
1. Two Guys Realty - Plaintiff and provider of the loan.
2. Slow_samitch - Defendant and borrower under the loan agreement.

II. FACTS (All times and dates are in AEST.)
1. On May 31, 2026, the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a Mortgage Contract regarding Plot C634. (P-001)
2. Under the Mortgage Contract, the Plaintiff provided the Defendant with a loan of $32,000 to acquire Plot C634.
3. As per the agreement, a payment plan was made available alongside the agreement, requiring the Defendant to make monthly payments for three months. (P-002)
4. The Contract provides that C634 serves as collateral for the loan, until the balance has been repaid in full, putting responsibility on the Borrower to ensure the property meets government requirements. (P-001)
5. On June 30, 2026, the Defendant's first payment was due, yet not delivered. (P-002)
6. On July 4, 2026, Plot C634 was put up for eviction due to inactivity. The property was seized on July 11, 2026, in violation to the Mortgage Agreement. (P-001, P-003, P-004)
7. On July 6, 2026, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant through Discord DM of lack of payment, beginning the cure period. No response has been provided to the Plaintiff since. (P-005)
8. On July 13, 2026, the default officially occurred.
9. On July 13, 2026, the property was sold by the Department of Construction and Transportation, resulting in the loss of collateral for the Plaintiff.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Contracts Act states five criteria that must be met as part of a legal test to create a contract. Both parties met these requirements. A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to fulfil its contractual obligations. The Defendant made a clear and obvious violation of a legally binding contract.
2. The Defendant has failed to uphold their duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, acting outrageously, knowing that such a violation would harm the Plaintiff.
2. Section III of the Mortgage Contract clearly states that the Plaintiff is entitled to seek legal action against the Borrower if defaults occur in order to relieve any damage caused by the Borrower.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $35,914.50 in Compensatory Damages for violation of the Mortgage Contract.
2. $20,000 in Punitive Damages, as outlined by Section III of the Mortgage Contract, due to the Defendants outrageous conduct.
3. 30% of the total awarded damages in legal fees.
4. Any further relief the Court deems just and proper.

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 14 day of July, 2026.

 

[exclusiv3z]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court freezes assets belonging to Slow_samitch to a total value of $55,914.50 for the duration of this trial. The purpose of this injunction is to prevent the Defendant from dispersing their assets or losing their assets as a result of their inactivity, which would cause great harm to the Plaintiff. This is a highly reasonable injunction, given the Defendant's behaviour of not being able to uphold a contract.

 

[Dartanboy]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION

Your Honor,

The Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court freezes assets belonging to Slow_samitch to a total value of $55,914.50 for the duration of this trial. The purpose of this injunction is to prevent the Defendant from dispersing their assets or losing their assets as a result of their inactivity, which would cause great harm to the Plaintiff. This is a highly reasonable injunction, given the Defendant's behaviour of not being able to uphold a contract.

Granted in part.

The purpose of an Emergency Injunction "is to prevent harm" (Court Orders Guide). As such, an Emergency Injunction cannot be granted for all requested damages, as Punitive Damages are not a harm to the Plaintiff - they are "awarded against a person to punish them for their outrageous conduct and to deter them and others like them from similar conduct in the future." (Redmont Civil Code Act).

The Court does find probable cause to suggest the Defendant defaulted on a loan and allowed its collateral to be transferred away (this should not be construed as a declaration that the Defendant did do so), and as such approves the Emergency Injunction for the DHS to seize $35,914.50.

 

[Dartanboy]

Writ of Summons

Slow_samitch is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Two Guys Realty v. Slow_samitch [2026] DCR 125.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[Dartanboy]

Defendant was sent the following mail: