dodrio3
Citizen
Supporter
Oakridge Resident
4th Anniversary
Change Maker
Popular in the Polls
Statesman
Dodrio3
attorney
- Joined
- May 15, 2021
- Messages
- 248
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Titan Law,
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont,
Defendant
On October 1, 2024, Freeze_Line was appointed to the position of Attorney General (Exhibit P-001). Because there was no Senate confirmation, this appointment was in an acting capacity, although no official announcement was made to clarify that Freeze_Line’s role was temporary. On October 12, 2024, the Senate began and completed the confirmation process for Dartanboy to become the Attorney General (Exhibit P-002). This confirmation suggests that Freeze_Line’s acting appointment ended on or around this date, even though the government did not formally announce Dartanboy’s assumption of the role.
On October 23, 2024, Freeze_Line was again appointed as Acting Attorney General (Exhibit P-003), just 11 days after the confirmation of Dartanboy. Under the Executive Standards Act, Section 5, it is clearly stated that: “After an Acting Secretary’s term is up, they may not be reappointed as Acting Secretary for 14 days.” As the gap between Freeze_Line’s terms was less than 14 days, this reappointment is in direct violation of the law, rendering it invalid. Therefore, the Plaintiff seeks to have this appointment revoked.
DATED: This 23 day of October, 2024.
P-001
P-002
P-003
CIVIL ACTION
Titan Law,
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont,
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff, Titan Law, files this complaint against the Defendant, the Commonwealth of Redmont, and states the following:On October 1, 2024, Freeze_Line was appointed to the position of Attorney General (Exhibit P-001). Because there was no Senate confirmation, this appointment was in an acting capacity, although no official announcement was made to clarify that Freeze_Line’s role was temporary. On October 12, 2024, the Senate began and completed the confirmation process for Dartanboy to become the Attorney General (Exhibit P-002). This confirmation suggests that Freeze_Line’s acting appointment ended on or around this date, even though the government did not formally announce Dartanboy’s assumption of the role.
On October 23, 2024, Freeze_Line was again appointed as Acting Attorney General (Exhibit P-003), just 11 days after the confirmation of Dartanboy. Under the Executive Standards Act, Section 5, it is clearly stated that: “After an Acting Secretary’s term is up, they may not be reappointed as Acting Secretary for 14 days.” As the gap between Freeze_Line’s terms was less than 14 days, this reappointment is in direct violation of the law, rendering it invalid. Therefore, the Plaintiff seeks to have this appointment revoked.
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
- Titan Law - Plaintiff
- The Commonwealth of Redmont - Defendant
- Freeze_Line - Acting Attorney General
II. FACTS
- On October 1, 2024, Freeze_Line was appointed as Attorney General, without Senate confirmation, in an acting capacity (Exhibit P-001).
- On October 12, 2024, Dartanboy’s Senate confirmation process for Attorney General began and concluded, resulting in his appointment (Exhibit P-002).
- Freeze_Line was reappointed as Acting Attorney General on October 23, 2024, despite the 14-day prohibition (Exhibit P-003).
- The gap between October 12 and October 23 is less than 14 days.
- Section 5 of the Executive Standards Act prohibits the reappointment of an Acting Secretary within 14 days of the conclusion of their previous term.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
- Freeze_Line’s reappointment as Acting Attorney General on October 23, 2024, violates Section 5 of the Executive Standards Act, which enforces a 14-day prohibition between acting terms.
- The Defendant's failure to comply with this statute makes Freeze_Line’s reappointment illegal.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following relief from the Defendant:- The immediate removal of Freeze_Line from the position of Acting Attorney General.
- $50,000 in punitive damages for the Commonwealth’s failure to abide by its own laws.
- $15,000 in legal fees, representing 30% of the total claim.
DATED: This 23 day of October, 2024.
P-001
P-002
P-003