- Joined
- Jul 20, 2026
- Messages
- 6
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Golden Meadow Co.
Plaintiff
v.
BorgiBuilds
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I, .TinolangSabaw, owner of Golden Meadow Co., affirm that BorgiBuilds has breached their contract multiple times. They have stolen company property, have not worked at the company for the required amount of time (they have been employed for 4 days out of the required 3 weeks) and have not noticed the company prior to the termination of their employment.
I. PARTIES
1. Golden Meadow Co. ( “Plaintiff”) A duly operated agricultural company within the Commonwealth of Redmont, represented by Blackstone Law Group (P 3.1: Proof of representation)
2. BorgiBuilds (“Defendant”) The individual responsible for the lost profits and Breach of Contract at issue.
II. FACTS
1. The Defendant signed a contract including the following clauses: "The Employee shall not steal, remove, damage, or misappropriate any crops, equipment, tools, fuel, building materials, or any other property belonging to the Employer or associated with Golden Meadow Co." & "The Employee agrees that they may only resign or end their employment voluntarily after completing at least three (3) full weeks of service from their official start date. Should the Employee wish to resign after this period, they shall provide advance notice to the Employer."(P 1.1)
2. The employment contract was signed on the 27th of July 2026 (P 1.2)
3. The Defendant recieved a plethora of items from the Plaintiff in order to complete their job more efficiently. Among the tools given was a red tractor. (P 1.3)
4. The tractor "disappeared" according to the Defendant, which is impossible (P 1.4)
5. The Plaintiff tried to get compensation from the Staff team (P 1.4)
6. The Staff team refused to compensate the tractor so the Plaintiff made an agreement with the Defendant stating that the Defendant is responsible for compensation. (P 1.5 & P 1.6)
7. After asking the Defendant to reaffirm the agreement and meeting refusal, the Plaintiff reduced the time limit for compensation from 7 days to 5 (the . The Defendant then claimed they couldn't meet the required amount of wheat within the new timeframe. (P 1.7)
8. The Plaintiff repeatedly tried to reaffirm the agreement in order to resolve the conflict, but was answered by the Defendant blocking the Plaintiff on discord and leaving the company server (P 1.8 & P 1.9)
9. The Defendant founded their own company in the same industry as Golden Meadow Co. but has dissolved it prior to the current date (P 1.10)
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Defendant committed a Breach of Contract (Civil Code Act VI.1) by:
a) stealing a tractor from the Plaintiff
b) terminating their employment after 4 days instead of the 3 weeks stated in the contract
c) not giving proper prior notice to terminate their employment
2. The punitive damages are justified by the outrageous conduct of the Defendant with neither having regard to the laws of Redmont nor to the employment contract. The Defendant has demonstrated a substantial departure from acceptable standards of behaviour and reflects a wilful, dishonest, reckless and grossly negligent disregard for the rights and interests of others.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $10,000 in compensatory damages for the stolen tractor.
2. $42,000 in compensatory damages for the lost profit ($2,500 per day * 17 days) (P 2.1 & P 2.2)
3. $150 in compensatory damages for the cost to hire a new employee (P 2.3)
4. $12,850 in punitive damages for the outrageous conduct of the Defendant
Totalling $65,000
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 31. day of July 2026
