- Joined
- Jun 25, 2026
- Messages
- 5
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Themoneylord
Plaintiff
v.
Coslos
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
I. PARTIES
1. Themoneylord (Plaintiff)
2. Coslos (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. On or about the 24th of June, the Plaintiff paid one thousand ($1000) to play one of the Defendant’ slot machines.
2. Said slot machine was out of winning tickets, as testified to by The Defendant, when he said, “I figured out,” “what h[a]ppened to that machine,” and “the dispensers were empty”
3. The Plaintiff asks the Defendant “Will {I} ever be paid,” to which the Defendant responded, “when the bank owner gets the money back.”
4. The Plaintiff alleges this statement to be a tactic of delay, for logs show that “coslos's balance” was “$2,520.79,” enough to fully reimburse the Plaintiff for their lost funds.
4. The Defendant’s statement of “when the bank owner gets the money back,” additionally implies that the Defendant promised to restore Plaintiff’s lost funds.
5. Several days later, on the 29th of June, 2026, the Plaintiff gave the Defendant twenty-four (24) hours to reimburse the Plaintiff the lost funds, before the prosecution planned on taking legal action.
6. The Defendant, instead of responding to The Plaintiff’s request of payment, attempted to ghost The Plaintiff by stating “wrong person,” despite earlier discussions showing that the Defendant recognized The Plaintiff’s Discord messages.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. FAILURE TO DELIVER GOODS OR SERVICES (RCCA Part VI §3)
Failure to deliver goods or services is committed when a person “fails without lawful excuse to deliver goods or services that they have agreed to supply under a valid transaction or contract.” It is clear that the actions of the Defendant fall under this law for the following reasons:
(a) A valid transaction was made. The defendant’s creation of a casino that is presented as offering winnings to lucky players, and the subsequent failure on the part of the Defendant to upkeep said machines or offer warnings that said machines may be out of stock following an exchange of money as a result of the use of said machines constitutes a failure to provide promised goods under a valid transaction and/or contract.
(b) This failure is compounded by the Defendant’s offer and subsequent failure to reimburse the goods, as is described in the case facts.
(c) The Defendant had no lawful excuse to not reimburse the goods, for the facts show that the Defendant had enough goods to reimburse the Plaintiff’s losses.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Specific performance to reimburse the Plaintiff his $1,000 that was spent on the faulty casino transition.
2. $20,000 in Civil Penalty Units.
3. $6,300 in legal fees.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 4 day of July, 2026.
Attachments
Last edited:
