- Joined
- May 30, 2026
- Messages
- 152
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
theman_youfeelme, TequilaSalad & IEatTimber
Plaintiff
v.
xXTheoryXx
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs complain against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I. PARTIES
1. theman_youfeelme (Plaintiff, #1 winner of the FontaineAds 100k tournament)
2. TequilaSalad (Plaintiff, #2 winner of the FontaineAds 100k tournament)
3. IEatTimber (Plaintiff, #3 winner of the FontaineAds 100k tournament)
4. xXTheoryXx (Defendant)
II. FACTS
1. FontaineAds Discord Business is operated mainly by Defendant, the bot was managed by the Defendant, and ceased operation upon the Defendant's deportation (before the tournament ended). lovepurplepoodle affirmed that FontaineAds was effectively ran by the Defendant. This statement will be proven by the live testimony of lovepurplepoodle, listed as a witness below.
(P-001)
2. On 2026-10-06 at 14:35:01 UTC, the Defendant announced in the FontaineAds Discord that a "new 100k prize pool will start soon".
(P-002)
3. On 2026-10-06 at 14:39:00 UTC, the Defendant announced in the FontaineAds Discord that a "Prize pool is live".
(P-002)
4. The Bot, managed by xXTheoryXx, states that the 100k tournament took place from 2026-10-06 at 00:00 UTC to 2026-11-06 at 23:59 UTC.
(P-003)
5. The Bot shows a prize of: $50,000 for first place, $35,000 for second place, $15,000 for third place.
(P-003)
6. The verbatim bot text (as of taking the screenshot in 2026-11-07 at approximately 14:42) is:
(P-003)Prize Pool Race
Every verified run between 10/6/26 and 11/6/26 counts. The race closes 15 hours ago.
$100,000.00 runner pool:$50,000.00 ·
$35,000.00 ·
$15,000.00
7. The Bot shows that theman_youfeelme took first place with 121 runs, TequilaSalad took second place with 93 runs, IEatTimber took third place with 81 runs.
(P-003)
8. The Plaintiffs' counsel approached lovepurplepoodle, who is effectively a secondary manager, the FontaineAds discord service with the Defendant and lovepurplepoodle stated that only Theory (the Defendant) is able to pay out. This statement will be proven by the live testimony of lovepurplepoodle, listed as a witness below.
(P-001)
9. The Defendant and a Defendant's employee advertised FontaineAds by highlighting the 100k prize pool in #business discord forum channel.
(P-004)
10. Other ad services such as SlashAd at times had higher payouts than FontaineAds, yet the Plaintiffs did FontaineAds with the tournament as motivation.
(P-005, P-006)
11. The Plaintiffs and Defendant all had guaranteed more than 5 days of playtime 30 days ago since 2026-11-07.
(P-007, P-008, P-009, P-010)
12. The Implied terms by reasonable custom of a tournament is that the tournament organizer will deliver the designated prizes upon completion of the tournament, such as for example, DPA-hosted tournaments.
13. The Defendant is currently deported and was deported in the middle of the tournament and is therefore unable to grant the tournament prizes.
(P-010)
14. FTL consulting v. Naezaratheus [2025] DCR 41 states that "Since the Defendant was deported, it is clear that they would not have been able to uphold their obligations of the contract in question. This is a breach of contract according to the Contracts Act § 7.1, and § 7.1.a of the same act provides the Plaintiffs an avenue to seek relief." which means that a deported Defendant is not exempt from breach of contract if they do not fulfill their contractual obligations.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Offer under the Contracts Act:
On 2026-10-06, the Defendant announced a "100k prize pool" in the FontaineAds Discord (Facts 2 and 3), the bot, configured by the Defendant, displayed the whole detailed tournament info displaying the prizes, who would be the winners, and when it would end (Facts 4, 5, and 6). The Defendant later used the "100k prize pool" as a promotional tool to get advertisers (Fact 9).
This is a reasonably inferred clear communication expressing the Defendant's willingness to enter into a contract.
2. Acceptance under the Contracts Act:
The Plaintiffs accepted the Defendant's offer by running a total of 295 ads (Fact 7) in FontaineAds despite SlashAd offering higher payouts at times (Fact 10).
3. Consideration under the Contracts Act:
The Plaintiffs invested a significant amount of time in performing a total of 295 ads (Fact 7) in FontaineAds despite SlashAd offering higher payouts at times (Fact 10).
The Defendant obtained those additional ads and higher participation in a startup from those 295 ads in the competition.
4. Intent under the Contracts Act:
The Defendant configured the FontaineAds bot to track the tournament (Facts 4, 5, and 6), and publicly advertised FontaineAds by using the 100k prize pool as a promotional tool (Fact 9).
The Plaintiffs invested a significant amount of time in performing a total of 295 ads (Fact 7) in FontaineAds despite SlashAd offering higher payouts at times (Fact 10). This shows a clear intention to participate in the tournament.
5. Capacity under the Contracts Act:
All parties had at least 5 days of playtime at the relevant time (Fact 11), far exceeding 6 hours of playtime, which is the legal capacity requirement.
6. It is implied by reasonable common sense custom that the participants of a tournament will receive the prize promised if they are eligible (Fact 12). Under 5(2) of the Contracts Act: (2) Implied Terms. Implied terms may be derived from law, custom, or the conduct of the parties.
7. The Defendant was deported in the middle of the tournament, rendering him unable to complete their end of the contract, this is still a breach of contract under FTL consulting v. Naezaratheus [2025] DCR 41 precedent (Fact 14).
8. If there was no contract, the Defendant misled the Plaintiffs in using a newer ad service over an established ad service (Fact 9, and Facts 2 to 6).
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiffs seek the following from the Defendant:
1. Specific Performance or the equivalent as Compensatory Damages of the tournament prize for Breach of Contract under PART VI of the RCCA by giving $50,000 to theman_youfeelme, $35,000 to TequilaSalad, $15,000 to IEatTimber.
2. In the alternative that the court can't award prayer 1 because no contract was formed:
$25 for each ad completed during the tournament ($7,375) in Compensatory Damages for Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce under PART VI of the RCCA.
The Defendant engaged in conduct that misled the Plaintiffs by advertising FontaineAds using the "100k prize pool" as a promotion, yet no prize was paid out, the Plaintiffs invested a significant amount of time in performing a total of 295 ads (Fact 7) in FontaineAds despite SlashAd offering higher payouts at times (Fact 10).
$25 is an estimate to not measure each and every single ad, at election time SlashAd paid $190 while FontaineAds paid $137.75.
3. 30% of the case value in legal fees to the Plaintiffs' legal counsel, unalign.
Evidence:
WITNESS LIST:
lovepurplepoodle (secondary manager of FontaineAds)
Musclebound (advertised the 100k prize pool)
theman_youfeelme (ran ads for the tournament)
TequilaSalad (ran ads for the tournament)
IEatTimber (ran ads for the tournament)
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 9th day of November 2026