Ongoing The Redmont Trans+ Foundation LLC

[PostOfficeTower]

Username: PostOfficeTower

Registered name of the company: The Redmont Trans+ Foundation LLC

Name of the in-game company: transplusnetwork

Directors of the Incorporated Entity:
PostOfficeTower, FloofyLunafox, BowtiePanda, MJL_

Officers of the Incorporated Entity and their title:
PostOfficeTower, President
FloofyLunafox, Treasurer
BowtiePanda, Commercial Officer
MJL_, Legal Advisor to the Board

Share or member register:
PostOfficeTower, FloofyLunafox, BowtiePanda

Any ongoing court cases:
None

Any ongoing enforcement actions:
None

Latest version of the formation instrument:
File(s) attached

 

[EATB]

Username: PostOfficeTower

Registered name of the company: The Redmont Trans+ Foundation LLC

Name of the in-game company: transplusnetwork

Directors of the Incorporated Entity:
PostOfficeTower, FloofyLunafox, BowtiePanda, MJL_

Officers of the Incorporated Entity and their title:
PostOfficeTower, President
FloofyLunafox, Treasurer
BowtiePanda, Commercial Officer
MJL_, Legal Advisor to the Board

Share or member register:
PostOfficeTower, FloofyLunafox, BowtiePanda

Any ongoing court cases:
None

Any ongoing enforcement actions:
None

Latest version of the formation instrument:
File(s) attached

Hello @PostOfficeTower ,

Whilst the Company Docket filing is compliant, Section 10 of the Certificate is not compliant with Legal Entity Act Part VI, Section 2(5), as Section 10 of your Certificate states that upon dissolution, funds may be "transferred to another entity (where legally allowed)". The Legal Entity Act imposes strict rules on Non-Profit LLCs to prevent the illicit transfer of tax-free money. Part VI, Section 2(5) of the Legal Entity Act strictly states that "Upon voluntary windup and dissolution, any net leftovers shall be transferred to the government or given back equally to the non-profit’s donors up to their total donated amount". You should remove the provision allowing funds to be transferred to "another entity", and update Section 10 to match the Legal Entity Act's requirements regarding dissolution.

 

[PostOfficeTower]

Section 10 of the CoF clarifies that the transfer of funds to another entity is only possible "where legally allowed" - in this sense you should interpret it as indirectly referring to the government, or in the event of bankruptcy, a trustee or estate appointed to administer the return of foundation funds to donors. @EATB

 

[EATB]

Section 10 of the CoF clarifies that the transfer of funds to another entity is only possible "where legally allowed" - in this sense you should interpret it as indirectly referring to the government, or in the event of bankruptcy, a trustee or estate appointed to administer the return of foundation funds to donors. @EATB

@PostOfficeTower the statement is too broad. Please update Section 10 to explicitly state that remaining funds will be transferred to the Government of Redmont or returned to donors. Part VI, Section 2(5) of the Legal Entity Act strictly states that "Upon voluntary windup and dissolution, any net leftovers shall be transferred to the government or given back equally to the non-profit’s donors up to their total donated amount".

 

[MJL]

@PostOfficeTower the statement is too broad. Please update Section 10 to explicitly state that remaining funds will be transferred to the Government of Redmont or returned to donors. Part VI, Section 2(5) of the Legal Entity Act strictly states that "Upon voluntary windup and dissolution, any net leftovers shall be transferred to the government or given back equally to the non-profit’s donors up to their total donated amount".

Hey EatB!

The reason I used that language instead of just picking one or the other is because I wanted to allow for the possibility of the dissolution resulting in the funds be given to another nonprofit. That is currently not allowed, but since I'm a Representative I wrote a bill to make it possible.

Even if that bill does not pass, I also wasn't quite sure what qualifies as "to the government" here. The government has several accounts, so would the nonprofit be able to pick? Either way, I believe the government, or any of its specific departments, qualifies as "another entity", no?

Regardless, I don't see this wording allowing funds to be transferred to a for-profit (or non-tax exempt) organizations. That would not be legally allowed.

 

[PostOfficeTower]

Please see the Certificate of Formation as amended to include reference to the transference of funds to the government upon voluntary dissolution. Since the LEA is vague as to what "the government" actually is, I have included provisions to direct the funds to a specific part of Government in the dissolution instrument.

 

[EATB]

Please see the Certificate of Formation as amended to include reference to the transference of funds to the government upon voluntary dissolution. Since the LEA is vague as to what "the government" actually is, I have included provisions to direct the funds to a specific part of Government in the dissolution instrument.

Hi @PostOfficeTower thank you for the updated Certificate. Could you please also fix a critical typo in Section 7 (Profits). It currently says "No funds shall not be distributed". This double negative accidentally states that funds must be distributed to members, which directly violates the Legal Entity Act's ban on non-profit revenue distribution. Please change it to "No funds shall be distributed".

 

[EATB]

Hey EatB!

The reason I used that language instead of just picking one or the other is because I wanted to allow for the possibility of the dissolution resulting in the funds be given to another nonprofit. That is currently not allowed, but since I'm a Representative I wrote a bill to make it possible.

Even if that bill does not pass, I also wasn't quite sure what qualifies as "to the government" here. The government has several accounts, so would the nonprofit be able to pick? Either way, I believe the government, or any of its specific departments, qualifies as "another entity", no?

Regardless, I don't see this wording allowing funds to be transferred to a for-profit (or non-tax exempt) organizations. That would not be legally allowed.

Hi @MJL the Department understands your intent, especially as a Representative working on prospective legislation. However, as an executive department, the Department of Commerce is legally bound to enforce the Legal Entity Act as it is currently written today, not as it might be written in the future. Should your bill pass, you can easily amend this Certificate of Formation later to allow transfers to other non-profits.

 

[PostOfficeTower]

@EATB Please see what should be the final draft of the CoF.

 

[EATB]

Signed by the DOC Secretary or their delegate, company docket continues below.

 

[PostOfficeTower]

Hello - Can you confirm that in game db "transplusnetwork" has been added to the tax exemption list? I want to make sure of this before I transfer all of the donated funds from gnomefundme, and I am very keen not to lose a majority of it to the government in taxation.

 

[MJL]

Hello - Can you confirm that in game db "transplusnetwork" has been added to the tax exemption list? I want to make sure of this before I transfer all of the donated funds from gnomefundme, and I am very keen not to lose a majority of it to the government in taxation.

List of Tax Exempt Firms

 

[PostOfficeTower]

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Tuesday 30th June 2026

Agenda:
- Deliberation of issuing grants to player businesses that benefit the LGBTQ+ community.

Resolutions:
- That the Foundation issue grants to player businesses that benefit the LGBTQ+ community

In favour: PostOfficeTower, MJL_, TheBowtiePanda, FloofyLunaFox
Against: N/A
Abstentions: N/A

Result: Motion carried unanimously, the Board will make the necessary arrangements to allow grants to be issued.

 

[PostOfficeTower]

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Sunday 5th July 2026.

Agenda:
- Setting the details and terms for the first round of funding under the Community Business Grants Programme.

Resolutions voted on:

Resolution 2: Initiating the Community Business Grants Programme
"IT IS RESOLVED, that the Foundation should institute a grants programme. WHEREAS, it is necessary to institute the rules of the scheme and lay the groundwork for the first funding round. KNOW YE THAT WE, the Board of Directors of the Redmont Trans+ Foundation do resolve to initiate the first funding round of the Community Business Grants Programme, and do direct the allocation of DC$20,000 to be given out to recipients of the scheme. KNOW YE THAT WE, the Board of Directors have decided that applications for the Community Business Grants Programme shall open this Sunday the 5th day of July 2026, and shall close on the 10th day of July 2026. KNOW YE THAT WE, that the Board of Directors shall look at each grant application, which should contain the purpose of asking for these funds, and how much of the funds you require, and then the board will decide whether or not to grant the request. BE YE WARNED, that recipients of the grant will be required to provide evidence to the Board that they have used the funds provided for the purpose they provided in their application, and that recipients of the grant may not apply for a further grant until a period of six months has elapsed since their grant was issued."

In favour: PostOfficeTower, MJL_, BowtiePanda
Against:
Abstentions: FloofyLunaFox (Did not vote)

Result: Motion carried 3-1-0.

 

[PostOfficeTower]

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Friday 10th June 2026.

See attached minutes

 

[Planke32]

This is an official DOC enforcement notice. transplusnetwork have until the end of today to file their report for July.

Per BITA Part IV Section 22(1) and (2). Late filings cause transplusnetwork to be liable for a penalty of $2.500 per day for their first missed report, and $5.000 per day for repeat failure. These late fees will start stacking tomorrow, if not remedied before then.

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Registered name: The Redmont Trans+ Foundation LLC
Register number: DOC-CO-0075
Entity form: nonprofit
In-game company: transplusnetwork
Nature of business: The Foundation may engage in any lawful nonprofit activity permitted under the Act to further Transgender visibility and issues in Redmont.
Formation instrument: Formed on the Standard Form (RCEA s17(5))
Directors, managers and general partners: FloofyLunafox (Treasurer), BowtiePanda (Commercial Officer), Lovepurplepoodle (Vice President), StrawberrySara (President), PostOfficeTower (Chairwoman)
Member register: PostOfficeTower (member), FloofyLunafox (member), BowtiePanda (member), StrawberrySara (Member), Lovepurplepoodle (Member)
In-game company owner (RCEA s8(2)): PostOfficeTower
Legal correspondence designee: strawberrysara (accepted)

This thread mirrors the official Company Docket. The authoritative record is the DOC portal: DOC-CO-0075 · Company Register · DOC Redmont
Docket entries are posted below as they are filed (RCEA s15(3): the docket is append-only and permanent).

Continued under RCEA s85 from the pre-portal record: https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/39533/

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Continued under RCEA s85: The Redmont Trans+ Foundation LLC (DOC-CO-0075)
certificate record · filed by Planke32

This entity existed under the repealed Legal Entity Act and continues under the RCEA as a nonprofit (s85(1)). Its original filings remain valid (s85(4)); the pre-portal record is the Company Docket thread: https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/39533/

PROFILE INCOMPLETE: the entity must complete its registers via the DOC portal (s85(5), s17).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Changes to the Management of the Foundation and Network
announcement · filed by PostOfficeTower

PostOfficeTower has resigned as President of the Redmont Trans+ Network, in her place, StrawberrySara and Lovepurplepoodle have been appointed as President and Vice President respectively, these positions come with Board membership. PostOfficeTower has now reverted to being just the Chairwoman of the Board of Directors.

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Changes to the Management of the Foundation and Network
announcement · filed by PostOfficeTower

PostOfficeTower has resigned as President of the Redmont Trans+ Network, in her place, StrawberrySara and Lovepurplepoodle have been appointed as President and Vice President respectively, these positions come with Board membership. PostOfficeTower has now reverted to being just the Chairwoman of the Board of Directors.

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Appointment: Lovepurplepoodle, Vice President (manager)
officer change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Removal or resignation: Lovepurplepoodle, Vice President (manager)
officer change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Removal or resignation: PostOfficeTower, President (director)
officer change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Appointment: Lovepurplepoodle, Vice President (director)
officer change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Appointment: StrawberrySara, President (director)
officer change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Appointment: PostOfficeTower, Chairwoman (director)
officer change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Membership interests reallocated: PostOfficeTower 0.00%, FloofyLunafox 0.00%, BowtiePanda 0.00%
member change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Member admitted: StrawberrySara (Member)
member change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Member admitted: Lovepurplepoodle (Member)
member change · filed by edwardcul1en

Adopted on 2026-09-18 (RCEA s15(9)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Correspondence designee named: strawberrysara
profile change · filed by strawberrysara

strawberrysara is designated to receive legal correspondence (RCEA s17(3)). Summons go to them only once they accept the designation (s13(1)(a)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

In-game company owner recorded: PostOfficeTower
profile change · filed by strawberrysara

The in-game company transplusnetwork is owned by PostOfficeTower. Owning the in-game company does not of itself make a person an interest holder or agent of the entity (RCEA s8(3)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Correspondence designation accepted: strawberrysara
profile change · filed by strawberrysara

strawberrysara accepts the designation to receive legal correspondence; a summons of the entity is addressed to them first (RCEA s13(1)(a)).

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Removal or resignation: MJL_, Advisor (director)
officer change · filed by PostOfficeTower

 

[Dept. Commerce]

Tax exemption granted: The Redmont Trans+ Foundation LLC
announcement · filed by edwardcul1en

Monthly reporting required due to the large balance being held. Exemption granted (all requirements met).

The Department grants the non-profit an exemption from taxation (RCEA s61(3); Taxation Act s9(1)(c)), from today (Tax s9(2)). While it holds the exemption it shall keep transaction and accounting records and submit monthly financial reports (RCEA s61(3)(a)-(b)). The exemption may be withdrawn for misconduct or non-compliance (s61(4)). It is published on the list of exemptions in force (Tax s9(3)).

Electronically signed by edwardcul1en as delegate of the Commerce Secretary