Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Spirit_Pixelz [2023] DCR 41

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alexander P. Love

Citizen
Construction & Transport Department
Redmont Bar Assoc.
Supporter
Willow Resident
AlexanderLove
AlexanderLove
attorney
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
739
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution

v.

Spirit_Pixelz
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:


I. PARTIES
1. The Commonwealth of Redmont (Prosecution)
2. Spirit_Pixelz (Defendant)

II. FACTS
1. On October 31st during the evening, the purge was announced temporarily legalizing a wide range of crimes including murder. Events like these are coordinated for community-building among other reasons.
2. During the purge, AlexanderLove killed the defendant more than once, and the defendant did /complain, adding wanted points to AlexanderLove.
3. AlexanderLove later died and was sent to jail and fined for these wanted points.

III. CHARGES
The Prosecution hereby alleges the following charges against the Defendant:
1. According to the Miscellaneous Offenses Act (link), false accusations is the "act of falsely accusing someone of a crime and attempting to incur legal punishment when they could reasonably infer that the accused was innocent." Since murder was temporarily legal during the purge, accusing someone and having them sent to jail for murder during the purge is a false accusation. The Commonwealth charges the defendant with this crime thrice for three wanted points.

IV. SENTENCING
The Prosecution hereby recommends the following sentence for the Defendant:
1. Per the Miscellaneous Offenses Act, the punishment for False Accusations is a $100 fine. The Commonwealth therefore requests the defendant be fined $300.

V. EVIDENCE
1698984390756.png
1698984412202.png
1698984427742.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 2nd day of November 2023
 
Last edited:
I have been assigned as the presiding judge for this case. Before I do anything else for this case, can I ask why the prosecution is prosecuting the defendant for purge related activity? The context reads that the action the defendant made was against the AG who at the time was acting in a non-official capacity during purge related activity.
 
I have been assigned as the presiding judge for this case. Before I do anything else for this case, can I ask why the prosecution is prosecuting the defendant for purge related activity? The context reads that the action the defendant made was against the AG who at the time was acting in a non-official capacity during purge related activity.
Your honor, pursuant to this Executive Order (link), murder is temporarily legalized and false accusations is not. Therefore, since murder is legal, the defendant committed false accusation by causing someone to be sent to jail for a legal activity. False accusations was still illegal the whole time.
 
Your honor, pursuant to this Executive Order (link), murder is temporarily legalized and false accusations is not. Therefore, since murder is legal, the defendant committed false accusation by causing someone to be sent to jail for a legal activity. False accusations was still illegal the whole time.
🤓
 
@SpiritzBeyond I am going to try to resolve this situation. That being said, I need you to exercise your right to silence and let court proceedings play out. The charge of contempt of court is, unfortunately, much more expensive than what you’re currently being charged with. Please let me speak with the attorney general and you can speak after you are summoned.
 
1699190360996.png


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF MANDAMUS

The DOJ Secretary @Technofied is requested to come and kindly answer a few questions for this court.

1. When was the charges laid against Alex?
2. Was the arrest automatic? (not done by a player police officer)​
 
I am present Your Honour. 🐋
1. There were five individual accounts of murder that AlexanderLove was charged with, within the context of this case, that is the murders of Spirit_Pixelz
2. The arrests were automatic, as denotated by "Arresting Officer: DCGovernment", this means he died in a 50 block radius of a Justice Department Officer.

1699235365568.png

1699235434682.png
 
Thank you Secretary Technofied, I appreciate your promptly response to my questions.
 
f5f9rlp.png


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

[USERGROUP=9]@Staff[/USERGROUP] is required to appear before the District Court in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Spirit_Pixelz [2023] DCR 41. to answer judge questions.

Please familiarize yourself with the case as it stands at present and answer this question.

1. Was Staff unable to disable /complaint or the auto-jail system for this purge?​
 
Sufficient notice wasn't given for that to occur.
 
Thank you Staff Team for your prompt response.
 
Given that the defendant of this case could not possibly have known not to /complaint during the purge and because the arrests were automatic in nature and not done purposefully, I find it hard to give any fault to the actions of the defendant. Let alone guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. I am deeming the issue to be a staff matter and dismissing the prosecution.

That being said, since there was improper jail-time given, even if automatically, I am also ordering that @Alexander P. Love be reimbursed for any jail time under 20.1(b) of the Judicial Standards Act.

This matter is dismissed.
 
I am Amending the Order

Please also reimburse @Alexander P. Love of any fine that he paid for the murders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top