Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. LilLethalVert [2023] DCR 33

[Alexander P. Love]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


The Commonwealth of Redmont
Plaintiff

v.

LilLethalVert
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

The Department of Construction and Transportation is conducting an urban renewal project, of which the defendant's current property (C271) is obstructing its progress. The DCT, on October 1st, offered a more than fair deal to the defendant which was rejected profusely. The Commonwealth now seeks eminent domain against the property.


I. PARTIES
1. LilLethalVert (Defendant)
2. The Department of Construction via the Commonwealth of Redmont (Plaintiff)

II. FACTS
1. The property C271 is obstructing an urban renewal project.
2. C271 is worth $4,192.50 according to the sellback amount listed.
3. The defendant was offered $7,000 in exchange for the property, a very generous offer, but the offer was refused.
4. The defendant was also afforded the opportunity to have any structures on C271 pasted to a new property.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Pursuant to the Reveille Eminent Domain Act (link), property may be seized under eminent domain if "the property obstructs the development of urban renewal or infrastructure projects". As stated earlier, the DCT is conducting an urban renewal project of which C271 is obstructing. Eminent domain is therefore justified and legal in this situation. The act also states that "The Department of Construction & Transportation may acquire privately owned property for public works programs, necessary infrastructure, and urban renewal initiatives." This further supports and buttresses the argument made under this claim for relief.
2. According to the same law, the DCT is required to "negotiate with the property owner and make a fair offer for the property" which was fulfilled. The offer was almost 60% more than the value of the property, which is more than fair. That extra 60% accounts for any inconvenience incurred.
3. Any structures on the property should not be assessed in the value as the defendant had the chance to have their structures moved to a new property free of charge. The $7,000 offer was more than enough to seek a new property that could house the structures on the old property, so this factor should not be taken into account when the defendant argues it either.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. The seizure of C271 from the defendant to the plaintiff.
2. $4,192.50 to be compensated from the plaintiff to the defendant.


By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 14th day of October 2023

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

@Lethal is required to appear before the District Court in the case of The Commonwealth of Redmont v. LilLethalVert.

Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​

 

[SumoMC]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS

Commonwealth of Redmont
Plaintiff

v.

LilLeathalVert (The Redmont Law Firm Representing)
Defendant

MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant move that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. We move to dismiss this case on a few grounds, one of those being that this case was filed in the wrong court. The Reveille Eminent Domain Act that has been cited here states that this procedure shall be on in the Federal Court, not the district court. This is not the proper forum for this to be argued in. With this fact we ask that this case be dismissed
2. The Commonwealth has stated that the plot is only worth $4192.50, this is false. The plot is worth $8385, the plot sell back value is 50% of the value of the plot, not the actual value of the plot. The Commonwealth has not offered my client a fair or reasonable deal no matter how they try to paint this fact.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

(The words defendant and complaint should be changed in case the motion is to dismiss a counterclaim.)

DATED: This 15th day of October 2023

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

The plaintiff may respond to the motion to dismiss if they would like to.

 

[Alexander P. Love]

The Commonwealth will refile this case in the Federal Court.

 

[Mask3D_WOLF]

Thank you, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice.