IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Steveshat (Represented by Dragon Law)
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On 2/5/2024, the Plaintiff experienced an unwarranted termination orchestrated by the Department of Commerce (DOC) Secretary, CzarKovalev. Despite providing irrefutable documentation substantiating their active participation, the Plaintiff was unjustly labeled as "inactive." Subsequently, after being called out for the invalid reason, CzarKovalev revised the rationale for termination, asserting a failure to meet DOC standards. The removal of the Plaintiff transpired under politically motivated agendas, as the DOC hired inexperienced individuals, aligned with the Secretary. My client, thus, suffered an unlawful expulsion from the DOC. After the removal from the DOC my client was then removed from a position within the Department of State (DOS) for the same original reason, both instances being marked by evident political motivations.
I. PARTIES
Steveshat
CzarKovalev (DOC Secretary)
Krix (DOS Deputy Secretary)
DOC (Department of Commerce)
DOS (Department of State)
II. FACTS
1. The Plaintiff's termination from the DOC was initially attributed to "inactivity," despite evidence of consistent work.
2. The Plaintiff provided proof of active work within the DOC.
3. After proving to the DOC that the Plaintiff was an active employee. The grounds for termination were then changed to "Not meeting DOC standards," with the Secretary providing vague and arbitrary criteria.
4. Dragons1ayer343, an employee with limited experience, was appointed as a senior economist within the DOC, further suggesting the influence of personal relationships in employment decisions.
5. The Plaintiff engaged in negotiations with the DOC, which proved unproductive, contributing to a lack of resolution.
6. Following the unsuccessful negotiations with the DOC, the DOS terminated the Plaintiff for the identical reason of "Being inactive," thereby indicating a consistent pattern of politically motivated removals within the government.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiff was unjustly and egregiously dismissed from positions within the Department of Commerce (DOC) and the Department of State (DOS), thereby flagrantly violating the laws set forth in the Commercial Standards Act. 13 - Employee Protections (1) Unfair dismissal - the unjust termination of an employee. (e.g. a position is made vacant without reason only to be immediately filled). This dismissal, lacking just cause or procedural fairness, reflects a gross miscarriage of justice within the governmental framework.
2. The Plaintiff was abruptly severed from employment without prior notification or indication of non-compliance with DOC standards. This sudden and unanticipated termination inflicted severe emotional distress and profound anxiety upon the Plaintiff, who had been diligently fulfilling their duties and demonstrating commitment to their roles within the DOC.
3. The termination from both the DOC and the DOS has resulted in a substantial loss of income for the Plaintiff, whose livelihood largely depended on the stability and continuity of their employment within these governmental entities. This financial repercussion compounds the injustices suffered as a result of the unwarranted terminations.
4. The Plaintiff continues to grapple with anxiety and confusion stemming from the lack of clarity surrounding the grounds for termination from both the DOC and the DOS. The absence of transparent communication and coherent justification exacerbates the Plaintiff's distress, leaving them in a state of uncertainty and disarray regarding their professional standing and future prospects within the government.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. Compensatory Damages: $50,000: The Plaintiff seeks $25,000 from both the Department of Commerce (DOC) and the Department of State (DOS) as compensatory damages. This amount is warranted to address the financial repercussions resulting from the unwarranted terminations. It encompasses the loss of income suffered by the Plaintiff due to their abrupt dismissal from both governmental positions, highlighting the economic hardships incurred. The loss of in-game wages, future project wages as well as investment opportunities with wages are calculated within this amount.
2. Punitive Damages: $20,000: In light of the politically motivated terminations orchestrated by the DOC and the DOS, the Plaintiff requests $10,000 from each department as punitive damages. This sum is intended to serve as a deterrent and punitive measure against the wrongful actions undertaken by the governmental entities. It reflects the severity of the injustice endured by the Plaintiff due to political motivations in their termination.
3. Consequential Damages: $40,000: The Plaintiff seeks $20,000 from both the DOC and the DOS as consequential damages. This amount is justified to address the emotional humiliation and severe anxiety inflicted upon the Plaintiff as a direct consequence of the unjust terminations. It accounts for the distress and confusion experienced by the Plaintiff, stemming from the lack of clarity surrounding the grounds for termination, as detailed in the earlier sections of this complaint.
Witness List:
Bardiya_King
Evidence:
By making this submission, I affirm my understanding of the legal consequences associated with perjury and hereby acknowledge my accountability for any knowingly false statements made in court.
DATED: This 11th day of February 2024