Lawsuit: Dismissed SCRGabriele180 v. vircento [2026] DCR 104

[SCRgabriele180]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
SCRGabriele180
Plaintiff
v.
vircento
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
When i was close to the spawn, on 30/06/2026, the defendant, virceto, injected Heroend with a syringe.

I. PARTIES
1. SCRGabriele180, Plaintiff
2. vircento, Defendant

II. FACTS
1. On June 30, 2026, the Plaintiff was sitting in his helicopter close in the town of Reveille
2. While the Plaintiff was abbout to drive, the defendant run into the Plaintiff, and inject Heroend with a syringe.
3. The Plaintiff without a reaction got killed from the defendant,

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiff respectfully submits that the Defendant has violated applicable laws and/or regulations of the Commonwealth of Redmont, resulting in direct harm to the Plaintiff.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant judgment in their favor and award damages in an amount of not less than $10,000, or such greater amount as the Court deems just and proper. The Plaintiff further requests any additional relief the Court considers fair and appropriate under the circumstances.

EVIDENCE
P-001: A screenshot of the chat in which the you can see te Defendant having used a syringe to drug the Plaintiff.

 

[Muggy21]

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
SCRGabriele180
Plaintiff
v.
vircento
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
When i was close to the spawn, on 30/06/2026, the defendant, virceto, injected Heroend with a syringe.

I. PARTIES
1. SCRGabriele180, Plaintiff
2. vircento, Defendant

II. FACTS
1. On June 30, 2026, the Plaintiff was sitting in his helicopter close in the town of Reveille
2. While the Plaintiff was abbout to drive, the defendant run into the Plaintiff, and inject Heroend with a syringe.
3. The Plaintiff without a reaction got killed from the defendant,

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. The Plaintiff respectfully submits that the Defendant has violated applicable laws and/or regulations of the Commonwealth of Redmont, resulting in direct harm to the Plaintiff.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant judgment in their favor and award damages in an amount of not less than $10,000, or such greater amount as the Court deems just and proper. The Plaintiff further requests any additional relief the Court considers fair and appropriate under the circumstances.

EVIDENCE
P-001: A screenshot of the chat in which the you can see te Defendant having used a syringe to drug the Plaintiff.
View attachment 88381

Under what section of the Redmont Civil Code Act, or alternatively our common law, do you rely on for your claims. You have 48 hours.

 

[SCRgabriele180]

I rely on the provisions of the Criminal Code Act, specifically Part IV (offences against public safety), including assault and murder, and Part VI (drug-related offences), including buffing and trafficking, as well as the general principles of criminal liability under Redmont common law.

 

[Muggy21]

The action is dismissed for lack of claim (see [2026] DCR 59). Chief Justice Smallfries4 explains why this action can't survive and must be dismissed.


See Lawsuit: Dismissed - Le9endz_ v. AussieBloke25 [2026] DCR 59