RemyTheRatta v. Bernerd_madoff

MMiqa

Citizen
Oakridge Resident
MMiqa
MMiqa
Attorney
Joined
Jun 1, 2026
Messages
67

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT


CIVIL ACTION


RemyTheRatta

Plaintiff

v.

Bernerd_madoff
Defendant





COMPLAINT


The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:


I. PARTIES


  1. RemyTheRatta (Plaintiff), a landlord who owns and rents residential apartment units known as quayapt13, quayapt14, quayapt15, and quayapt16.
  2. Bernerd_madoff (Defendant), a tenant who rented the above-referenced units from the Plaintiff. Server identity records confirm that all rental transactions described below, though recorded under an alternate account name, were carried out by the same underlying player as the Defendant. (Evidence: P-11)

II. FACTS


  1. On July 10, 2026, the Defendant rented apartment quayapt13 from the Plaintiff at 20:42:20 for $600.00, and unrented the same region at 20:43:33 — a total occupancy of approximately 73 seconds. (Evidence: P-01)
  2. On July 10, 2026, the Defendant rented apartment quayapt14 from the Plaintiff at 21:14:07 for $600.00, and unrented the same region at 21:14:55 — a total occupancy of approximately 48 seconds. (Evidence: P-02)
  3. On July 10, 2026, the Defendant rented apartment quayapt15 from the Plaintiff at 21:11:28 for $600.00, and unrented the same region at 21:13:57 — a total occupancy of approximately 2 minutes and 29 seconds. (Evidence: P-03)
  4. On July 10, 2026, the Defendant rented apartment quayapt16 from the Plaintiff at 21:08:20 for $600.00, and unrented the same region at 21:11:23 — a total occupancy of approximately 3 minutes and 3 seconds. (Evidence: P-04)
  5. Each of the four units was furnished with movable property (furniture and fixtures) belonging to the Plaintiff at the time of rental, including anvils, iron blocks, pearlescent froglights, white concrete, end rods, tinted glass, black concrete, iron doors, candles, barrels, skeleton skulls, and custom banners.
  6. Upon inspection following each unrenting, the Plaintiff discovered that the movable property inside each of the four units had been entirely removed, leaving the units stripped bare. (Evidence: P-05, P-06, P-07, P-08)
  7. In each instance, the Defendant received a near-total refund of the rental price upon unrenting (e.g. $599.96–$599.99 per transaction), consistent with a standard, uninterrupted unrent transaction rather than any dispute or eviction. (Evidence: P-01–P-04)
  8. The pattern across all four units — rental of extremely short duration, immediately followed by unrenting and a full refund, with the Plaintiff's property missing from the unit upon each unrenting — is inconsistent with any genuine tenancy and is inconsistent with the ordinary use of a rented region.
  9. When confronted regarding these events, the Defendant did not deny responsibility but instead responded: "well i dont have the stuff and what if i did do that what you are going to do about it there was no reason if i was the one who do it." (Evidence: P-09, P-10)
  10. The Plaintiff has itemized the movable property missing from each unit, including anvils, iron blocks, pearlescent froglights, white concrete, end rods, tinted glass, black concrete, iron doors, candles, barrels, skeleton skulls, and custom banners. Given the rarity and lack of a standing public market for certain of these items (particularly skeleton skulls and custom banners), the Plaintiff submits a conservative, consolidated fair market valuation of $1,000.00 per apartment for the movable property converted from each unit. (Evidence: P-12)
  11. This conservative valuation reflects prevailing market prices for standard items and a deliberately restrained estimate for scarce or bespoke items, submitted as the best available evidence of fair market value in the absence of a liquid market for those specific items.
  12. The total fair market value of the Plaintiff's property converted by the Defendant across all four units is $4,000.00 ($1,000.00 × 4 units).

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF


Count I: Conversion (quayapt13)
Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VII §7


The Defendant wrongfully took and withheld the Plaintiff's movable property from within quayapt13, with the intent to permanently deprive the Plaintiff of that property, by stealing it during the Defendant's brief and pretextual occupancy of the unit. The Defendant possesses no legal right to the property so taken, as the Defendant's tenancy extended only to the use of the rented region itself, and never to ownership or use of the Plaintiff's movable property contained therein.


Count II: Conversion (quayapt14) Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VII §7


The Defendant committed the same wrongful taking described in Count I, with respect to the Plaintiff's movable property located within quayapt14.


Count III: Conversion (quayapt15) Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VII §7


The Defendant committed the same wrongful taking described in Count I, with respect to the Plaintiff's movable property located within quayapt15.


Count IV: Conversion (quayapt16) Redmont Civil Code Act, Part VII §7


The Defendant committed the same wrongful taking described in Count I, with respect to the Plaintiff's movable property located within quayapt16.


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF


The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:


  1. $3,000.00 in Treble Damages for quayapt13, representing three times the fair market value of the Plaintiff's movable property stolen from that unit ($1,000.00), pursuant to the Conversion claim under RCCA Part VII §7.
  2. $3,000.00 in Treble Damages for quayapt14, representing three times the fair market value of the Plaintiff's movable property stolen from that unit ($1,000.00), pursuant to the Conversion claim under RCCA Part VII §7.
  3. $3,000.00 in Treble Damages for quayapt15, representing three times the fair market value of the Plaintiff's movable property stolen from that unit ($1,000.00), pursuant to the Conversion claim under RCCA Part VII §7.
  4. $3,000.00 in Treble Damages for quayapt16, representing three times the fair market value of the Plaintiff's movable property stolen from that unit ($1,000.00), pursuant to the Conversion claim under RCCA Part VII §7.
  5. Legal fees calculated at 30% of the total case value, pursuant to RCCA Part III §7(2)(a).

Total Primary Claim: $12,000.00 in Treble Damages, plus applicable court costs and 30% legal fees (approximately $3,600.00), for a combined total of approximately $15,600.00.


Evidence:


  • P-01: Realty history log for quayapt13
1784322303847.png
  • P-02: Realty history log for quayapt14
1784322321845.png
  • P-03: Realty history log for quayapt15
1784322345404.png
  • P-04: Realty history log for quayapt16
1784322359884.png
  • P-05–P-08: Screenshots depicting the interior condition of quayapt13, quayapt14, quayapt15, and quayapt16 following the Defendant's unrenting (P05, P06, P07, P08 in order)
1784322465010.png

1784322472056.png

1784322479064.png

1784322488839.png
  • P-09: Chat log capturing the Defendant's statement: "well i dont have the stuff and what if i did do that what you are going to do about it there was no reason if i was the one who do it"
1784322512464.png
  • P-10: Discord DM screenshot confirming Plaintiff's inquiry preceding the above statement
1784322583576.png
  • P-11: Server identity lookup confirming linkage between Defendant's accounts
1784322619885.png
  • P-12: Plaintiff's itemized property inventory and valuation for the four units
1784322678086.png

Witnesses:


  • RemyTheRatta (Plaintiff)

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 14th day of July 2026

 

Attachments

  • 1784322329902.png
    1784322329902.png
    444.1 KB · Views: 1
Back
Top