- Joined
- Jun 29, 2026
- Messages
- 7
- Thread Author
- #1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONTCIVIL ACTION
RealGamer203 (Represented independently by Hill Hokan)Plaintiff
v.
Separatrix Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On July 5, 2026, at approximately 2:00–3:00 AM EST, the Defendant, Separatrix, publicly asked in chat whether anyone was selling netherite. The Plaintiff, RealGamer203, responded and quoted a price of around $200 per netherite ingot. The Defendant asked to buy 3 ingots, and the Plaintiff confirmed a total price of $585. The Defendant expressed distrust, asking "how i know oyu wont scam me," to which the Plaintiff responded "you can sue me if i do lol." The Defendant stated they had been scammed before on another server and did not know how to sue. The parties agreed to meet at /spawn-south, and the Plaintiff proposed a partial-delivery arrangement: the Plaintiff would hand over 2 of the 3 ingots first, the Defendant would then pay $585, and the Plaintiff would deliver the final ingot. The Plaintiff delivered the 2 ingots. The Defendant then claimed to be unable to place a crafting table, asked whether there was a Discord "to ask how to place blocks," and left without paying. The Defendant rejoined, claimed their game had crashed, remained briefly while the Plaintiff asked for payment, and left again without paying. The Plaintiff has since been unable to locate or contact the Defendant.
I. PARTIES
II. FACTS
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
Claim I: Conversion
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
List of Evidence
P-001: Chat log showing the Defendant publicly asking if anyone was selling netherite, and offering up to $1,000.
P-002: Chat log showing the Plaintiff quoting a price of around $200 per netherite ingot to the Defendant.
P-003: Chat log showing the Defendant asking to buy 3 ingots.
P-004: Chat log showing the Plaintiff confirming a total price of $585 for 3 ingots.
P-005: Chat log showing the Plaintiff explaining how to use the /find command to locate chestshops.
P-006: Chat log showing the Defendant asking "so am i buying from you or not?"
P-007: Chat log showing the Plaintiff continuing to explain the /find command, and the Defendant confirming "i just buy from you then."
P-008: Chat log showing the Plaintiff instructing the Defendant to travel to /spawn-south, the resulting teleport confirmation, and the Plaintiff publicly stating the payment command ("do /pay RealGamer203 585").
P-009: Chat log showing the Defendant asking how they could confirm they would not be scammed, and the Plaintiff responding "you can sue me if i do lol," followed by the Defendant acknowledging having been scammed before on another server.
P-010: Chat log showing the Plaintiff proposing the partial-delivery arrangement ("I give you 2 and then you give me the money then i'll give you the final one"), and the Defendant immediately afterward asking why they could not place a crafting table.
P-011: Chat log showing a third party advising the Defendant to document the agreement and consult a lawyer if scammed, the Plaintiff confirming the area was locked, and the Defendant asking if there was a Discord server.
P-012: Server log showing the Defendant stating "im going to ask how to place blocks," immediately followed by a system log entry ("[-] Separatrix") confirming the Defendant disconnected from the server at that point.
Note on Evidence: P-012 documents the Defendant's first departure from the server. The Defendant's subsequent claim of a game crash upon rejoining, and their final departure without payment, are not independently documented by screenshot; they are recounted based on the Plaintiff's contemporaneous account. The absence of any payment confirmation in the server's chat or transaction log — in contrast to the confirmed delivery of 2 ingots evidenced above — together with the Defendant's subsequent unreachability, supports the inference that no payment was ever made.
Proof of representation: Signed Independent Legal Services Agreement between Hill Hokan and RealGamer203, confirming the Plaintiff's consent to be represented by Hill Hokan in this matter.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 6th day of July, 2026
RealGamer203 (Represented independently by Hill Hokan)Plaintiff
v.
Separatrix Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
On July 5, 2026, at approximately 2:00–3:00 AM EST, the Defendant, Separatrix, publicly asked in chat whether anyone was selling netherite. The Plaintiff, RealGamer203, responded and quoted a price of around $200 per netherite ingot. The Defendant asked to buy 3 ingots, and the Plaintiff confirmed a total price of $585. The Defendant expressed distrust, asking "how i know oyu wont scam me," to which the Plaintiff responded "you can sue me if i do lol." The Defendant stated they had been scammed before on another server and did not know how to sue. The parties agreed to meet at /spawn-south, and the Plaintiff proposed a partial-delivery arrangement: the Plaintiff would hand over 2 of the 3 ingots first, the Defendant would then pay $585, and the Plaintiff would deliver the final ingot. The Plaintiff delivered the 2 ingots. The Defendant then claimed to be unable to place a crafting table, asked whether there was a Discord "to ask how to place blocks," and left without paying. The Defendant rejoined, claimed their game had crashed, remained briefly while the Plaintiff asked for payment, and left again without paying. The Plaintiff has since been unable to locate or contact the Defendant.
I. PARTIES
- RealGamer203, Plaintiff
- Separatrix, Defendant
- Hill Hokan, legal representative for Plaintiff (Proof below)
II. FACTS
- On July 5, 2026, at approximately 2:00–3:00 AM EST, the Defendant publicly asked in chat if anyone was selling netherite.
- The Plaintiff responded, quoting a price of around $200 per netherite ingot.
- The Defendant asked to buy 3 ingots.
- The Plaintiff confirmed a total price of $585 for the 3 ingots.
- The Defendant expressed distrust, asking "how i know oyu wont scam me."
- The Plaintiff responded "you can sue me if i do lol." The Defendant stated they had previously been scammed on another server and did not know how to sue.
- A third party, TbbW82, publicly advised the Defendant to screenshot the agreement and contact a lawyer if scammed.
- The parties agreed to meet at /spawn-south to complete the exchange.
- To address the Defendant's stated concern, the Plaintiff proposed a partial-delivery arrangement: 2 ingots delivered first, followed by the Defendant's payment of $585, followed by delivery of the final ingot.
- The Plaintiff delivered 2 of the 3 agreed netherite ingots to the Defendant.
- Immediately afterward, the Defendant claimed to be unable to place a crafting table and asked whether there was a Discord to ask how to place blocks, then left.
- The Defendant rejoined shortly after, claimed their game had crashed, and remained in place briefly while the Plaintiff requested payment.
- The Defendant left again without making any payment.
- The Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff any portion of the agreed $585.
- The Plaintiff has attempted to locate and contact the Defendant since the incident and has been unable to do so.
- The transaction took place at /spawn-south, which is not the End, the Nether wild, or everwild.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
Claim I: Conversion
- Under the Civil Code Act, Part VII, Article 7, a person commits Conversion when they wrongfully take, obtain, or withhold property from an owner, intending to deprive the owner of it, by means including obtaining property through deception, lies, or false statements, or obtaining property by false promise pursuant to a scheme to defraud.
- The Defendant's conduct satisfies this definition. The Defendant induced the Plaintiff to hand over 2 netherite ingots by agreeing to a specific, mutually-designed verification arrangement, then manufactured a series of pretexts (an inability to place a crafting table, a claimed game crash) to avoid paying, before disappearing entirely.
- The sequence of events — a structured agreement designed specifically to prevent a scam, immediate excuses upon receiving partial payment in-kind, and subsequent disappearance with no further contact possible — supports no reasonable innocent explanation other than the Defendant never intending to pay.
- The Defendant's own words prior to the exchange — responding to their own question about being scammed with "how i know oyu wont scam me," and to the Plaintiff's answer with an acknowledgment that they had been scammed before and did not know how to sue — establish that the Defendant was fully aware of the nature of the arrangement and the consequence of failing to honor it before choosing not to pay.
- The transaction occurred at /spawn-south, so the exclusion under Article 7(d) for actions occurring in the End, Nether wild, or everwild does not apply.
- The Defendant cannot claim a reasonable belief of entitlement to the property under Article 7(e), as the Defendant was a party to an explicit, mutually-agreed arrangement defining exactly what was owed in return for the ingots delivered.
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
- $1,170 in Treble Damages (three times the $390 value of the 2 netherite ingots unlawfully obtained, calculated at $195 per ingot based on the parties' own agreed price of $585 for 3 ingots), pursuant to the Civil Code Act, Part VII, Article 7, and Part IV, Article 8.
- Legal fees, awarded at the greater of $3,000 (the District Court minimum) or 30% of the case value, pursuant to the Judicial Standards Act's provisions on Legal Fees.
- Any other relief the Court finds just and proper.
List of Evidence
P-001: Chat log showing the Defendant publicly asking if anyone was selling netherite, and offering up to $1,000.
P-002: Chat log showing the Plaintiff quoting a price of around $200 per netherite ingot to the Defendant.
P-003: Chat log showing the Defendant asking to buy 3 ingots.
P-004: Chat log showing the Plaintiff confirming a total price of $585 for 3 ingots.
P-005: Chat log showing the Plaintiff explaining how to use the /find command to locate chestshops.
P-006: Chat log showing the Defendant asking "so am i buying from you or not?"
P-007: Chat log showing the Plaintiff continuing to explain the /find command, and the Defendant confirming "i just buy from you then."
P-008: Chat log showing the Plaintiff instructing the Defendant to travel to /spawn-south, the resulting teleport confirmation, and the Plaintiff publicly stating the payment command ("do /pay RealGamer203 585").
P-009: Chat log showing the Defendant asking how they could confirm they would not be scammed, and the Plaintiff responding "you can sue me if i do lol," followed by the Defendant acknowledging having been scammed before on another server.
P-010: Chat log showing the Plaintiff proposing the partial-delivery arrangement ("I give you 2 and then you give me the money then i'll give you the final one"), and the Defendant immediately afterward asking why they could not place a crafting table.
P-011: Chat log showing a third party advising the Defendant to document the agreement and consult a lawyer if scammed, the Plaintiff confirming the area was locked, and the Defendant asking if there was a Discord server.
P-012: Server log showing the Defendant stating "im going to ask how to place blocks," immediately followed by a system log entry ("[-] Separatrix") confirming the Defendant disconnected from the server at that point.
Note on Evidence: P-012 documents the Defendant's first departure from the server. The Defendant's subsequent claim of a game crash upon rejoining, and their final departure without payment, are not independently documented by screenshot; they are recounted based on the Plaintiff's contemporaneous account. The absence of any payment confirmation in the server's chat or transaction log — in contrast to the confirmed delivery of 2 ingots evidenced above — together with the Defendant's subsequent unreachability, supports the inference that no payment was ever made.
Proof of representation: Signed Independent Legal Services Agreement between Hill Hokan and RealGamer203, confirming the Plaintiff's consent to be represented by Hill Hokan in this matter.
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 6th day of July, 2026
