Lawsuit: In Session Plura72 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 69

[Plura72]

Case Filing

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Plura72
Plaintiff

v.

The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I'm here today because something seriously wrong is going on, and it’s being done by the very people who are supposed to protect the law, not break it. The Commonwealth expects us, regular citizens, to follow its laws, and we do. But when the government itself—specifically the Department of the Interior—starts ignoring those same laws, that’s not something we can just turn a blind eye to.
What’s happening at the Reveille Shelter is shocking and honestly heartbreaking. In one case I saw, there were more than ten dogs crammed into a space barely 3x3 blocks. That’s not just unfair to the animals, it’s cruel. And it’s illegal. We’ve got laws against pet and animal overcrowding, and for good reason. These animals can’t speak for themselves. They depend on us to do the right thing.
But instead of fixing the problem, the Department of the Interior has done nothing. They’ve known about it, and they’ve let it continue. And what’s worse, the Department of Justice hasn’t done a thing about it either. It feels like no one’s being held responsible for this, even though it’s clearly against the law.
If the shelter can’t handle more animals, then they need to stop taking more in until they can. Or expand it—do something. But right now they’re just letting animals suffer, and we’re supposed to sit back and accept it?

I. PARTIES
1. Plura72
2. DoI
3. DoJ

II. FACTS
1. The Department of the Interior has been comiting animal abuse, more specifically violating Pet overcrowding and Animal overcrowding laws
2. The Department of the Interior has not made any effort to fix this issue
3. The Department of Justice has failed to prosecute the Department of Interior for their horrific actions.
4. Pet overcrowding is a crime under the Criminal Code Act
5. Animal overcrowding is a crime under the Criminal Code Act
6. both departments were negigent and aware of the issue and decided not to act on it
7. The reveille shelter is managed by the Department of the Interior

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(20) - Pet overcrowding
2. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(21) - Animal overcrowding


IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $50,000 to be given to the plaintiff for purposes of animal welfare services
2. $5.000 in legal fees
3. Public apology from the DoI
4. The immediate compliance of the DoI with animal welfare laws

Spoiler: p-001

Spoiler: p-002

Spoiler: p-003

Spoiler: p-004

Spoiler: p-005

Spoiler: p-006

Spoiler: p-007

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 8 day of july 2025

 

[ameslap]

Writ of Summons

@gribble19 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Plura72 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 69.

Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a default judgement based on the known facts of the case.

Both parties should make themselves aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.

 

[aubunny]

The Commonwealth is Present, your honor.

 

[ameslap]

The Commonwealth is Present, your honor.

The Defendant has 48 hours to post their answer to the complaint.

 

[Plura72]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to add to complaint

the plaitiff asks for the following to be ammended
old:
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(20) - Pet overcrowding
2. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(21) - Animal overcrowding

New:
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(20) - Pet overcrowding
2. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(21) - Animal overcrowding
3. Discrimination against dogs

Evidence

The plaintiff requests the following image to be accepted into evidence as P-008

 

[Plura72]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to add to complaint

the plaintiff respectfully requests the following to be admitted into evidence.

Evidence

P-009

P-010

P-011

Add to witness list:

AngryHamdog
_xrsp
Winterwolf
mcbrittle
SomeHumanonEarth
kay_jee
quazyoneandonly

 

[ameslap]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to add to complaint

the plaitiff asks for the following to be ammended
old:
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(20) - Pet overcrowding
2. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(21) - Animal overcrowding

New:
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(20) - Pet overcrowding
2. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(21) - Animal overcrowding
3. Discrimination against dogs

Evidence

The plaintiff requests the following image to be accepted into evidence as P-008
View attachment 56792

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to add to complaint

the plaintiff respectfully requests the following to be admitted into evidence.

Evidence

P-009
View attachment 56793
P-010
View attachment 56794
P-011
View attachment 56795

Add to witness list:

AngryHamdog
_xrsp
Winterwolf
mcbrittle
SomeHumanonEarth
kay_jee
quazyoneandonly

There is a time and place to add or edit complaints and it is during discovery. For the time being this is Denied. You may resubmit this once discovery begins.

Please review the court rules and procedure to ensure this does not happen in the future.

 

[Plura72]

There is a time and place to add or edit complaints and it is during discovery. For the time being this is Denied. You may resubmit this once discovery begins.

Please review the court rules and procedure to ensure this does not happen in the future.

Motion

Motion to Reconsider

Your honor, the evidence provided is significant for pre-trial proceedings, i ask the court to accept the witness list and the evidence submitted.

 

[Plura72]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to add to complaint

the plaintiff respectfully requests the following to be admitted into evidence.

Evidence

p-012 // Oakridge shelter fox overcrowding

p-013 // oakridge shelter dog space

 

[Plura72]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to add to complaint

the plaintiff respectfully requests the following to be admitted into evidence.

Evidence

P-014 // parrots exposed to natural weather conditions, animal endangerment and abandonament

 

[Plura72]

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to add to complaint

the plaintiff respectfully requests the following to be admitted into evidence.

Evidence

P-015

P-016

 

[ameslap]

Motion

Motion to Reconsider

Your honor, the evidence provided is significant for pre-trial proceedings, i ask the court to accept the witness list and the evidence submitted.

Motion

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Motion to add to complaint

the plaintiff respectfully requests the following to be admitted into evidence.

Evidence

p-012 // Oakridge shelter fox overcrowding
View attachment 56797
p-013 // oakridge shelter dog space
View attachment 56798

Motion to Reconsider and the new motion to amend are both Denied. Rule 3.3 states: "At anytime during the course of discovery, the plaintiff (or prosecution) may amend their Complaint to change the following..."

You will have your chance to amend your complaint. Furthermore, the trial does not commence until discovery is completed, so that meets your request of "the evidence provided is significant for pre-trial proceedings".