Plura72
Aventura Head Of Tourism
Education Department
Supporter
Aventura Resident
5th Anniversary
LcnGlazer
Guide
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2025
- Messages
- 110
- Thread Author
- #1
Case Filing
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
Plura72
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
I'm here today because something seriously wrong is going on, and it’s being done by the very people who are supposed to protect the law, not break it. The Commonwealth expects us, regular citizens, to follow its laws, and we do. But when the government itself—specifically the Department of the Interior—starts ignoring those same laws, that’s not something we can just turn a blind eye to.
What’s happening at the Reveille Shelter is shocking and honestly heartbreaking. In one case I saw, there were more than ten dogs crammed into a space barely 3x3 blocks. That’s not just unfair to the animals, it’s cruel. And it’s illegal. We’ve got laws against pet and animal overcrowding, and for good reason. These animals can’t speak for themselves. They depend on us to do the right thing.
But instead of fixing the problem, the Department of the Interior has done nothing. They’ve known about it, and they’ve let it continue. And what’s worse, the Department of Justice hasn’t done a thing about it either. It feels like no one’s being held responsible for this, even though it’s clearly against the law.
If the shelter can’t handle more animals, then they need to stop taking more in until they can. Or expand it—do something. But right now they’re just letting animals suffer, and we’re supposed to sit back and accept it?
I. PARTIES
1. Plura72
2. DoI
3. DoJ
II. FACTS
1. The Department of the Interior has been comiting animal abuse, more specifically violating Pet overcrowding and Animal overcrowding laws
2. The Department of the Interior has not made any effort to fix this issue
3. The Department of Justice has failed to prosecute the Department of Interior for their horrific actions.
4. Pet overcrowding is a crime under the Criminal Code Act
5. Animal overcrowding is a crime under the Criminal Code Act
6. both departments were negigent and aware of the issue and decided not to act on it
7. The reveille shelter is managed by the Department of the Interior
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(20) - Pet overcrowding
2. Act of Congress - Criminal Code Act VIII(21) - Animal overcrowding
IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. $50,000 to be given to the plaintiff for purposes of animal welfare services
2. $5.000 in legal fees
3. Public apology from the DoI
4. The immediate compliance of the DoI with animal welfare laws
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 8 day of july 2025