Plura72 v. Matthew100x & Pepecuu

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plura72

Citizen
Public Affairs Department
Health Department
Supporter
5th Anniversary
Plura72
Plura72
Event Coordinator
Joined
Jan 7, 2025
Messages
62

Case Filing


IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Plura72
Plaintiff

v.

Matthew100x & Pepecuu
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

I was unfairly banned from the courts by justice Matthew100x in Lawsuit: Dismissed - Plura72 v. Reverse Class action Group A JUSTICE HAS NO AUTORITY IN THE FEDERAL COURT and therefore unconstitutionally banned me, this is UNFAIR, then stupid court clerk pepecuu dismissed my newest case that is totally correct and has no errors and shouldnt be dismissed Plura72 v. Plura72 [2025] DCR




I. PARTIES

1. Plura72
2. Matthew100x
3. Pepecuu

II. FACTS

1. Plura72 was unfairly banned by a justice in the courts
2. plura72 filed a lawsuit that is not frivilous and hsould be accepted
3. stupid court clerk pepecuu dismissed my case without being a magistrate

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

1. constitunial rights violation
2. unfair dismissal of cases without the possibility of appeal

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:

1. 20.000$ in damges



By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.
DATED: This 7 day of may 2025

 
Case is deleted, you are presently barred from making cases. Get a lawyer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top