Lawsuit: Dismissed Plura72 v. JuniperFig & The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 16

[Plura72]

Case Filing

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Plura72
Plaintiff

v.

JuniperFig (In her official capacity as Ex-Attorney General Of the Commonwealth of Redmont.)
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendants

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF

During her time in office, JuniperFig repeatedly demonstrated a pattern of favoritism, lack of transparency, and disregard for both departmental policy and the integrity of the justice system. I believe these actions rise to the level of criminal incompetence, corruption, and nepotism.

It is clear from the evidence that many individuals hired by JuniperFig during her two terms as Acting Attorney General had close personal or political ties to her, including romantic partners, spouses, and party affiliates. These individuals were appointed without any clear evidence of qualifications, competitive hiring processes, or consideration of more suitable candidates. This strongly suggests a misuse of office to reward allies rather than serve the public interest.

Additionally, one individual—AsexualDinosaur—held two positions at once: as a prosecutor and as Public Defender Director. This is a direct conflict of interest and should never have been permitted. Despite my attempts to alert the Department of Justice through an anonymous tip, no investigation or action was taken. Just days later, the Employment Policy & Code of Conduct was quietly changed in a way that seems directly intended to cover for this conflict.

I believe JuniperFig knowingly allowed and participated in practices that undermined the fairness and legality of the justice system. She placed loyalty and personal ties above qualifications and legal standards, harming the credibility of the Department of Justice and the trust of the public.

I. PARTIES
(1) Plura72
(2) JuniperFig

II. FACTS
(1) JuniperFig is Currently Married to: AsexualDinosaur, IisForIzzy, McBrittle419, Taelor and WackJap
(2) JuniperFig has or had in May 10, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with aubunny
(3) JuniperFig has or had in May 10, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with Kaiserin
(4) JuniperFig has or had in May 10, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with AsexualDinosaur
(5) JuniperFig has or had in May 10, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with Gribble19
(6) JuniperFig has or had in May 11, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with Bardiya_King
(7) JuniperFig has or had in May 10, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with Eenza
(8) JuniperFig has or had in May 12, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with PricelessAgrari
(9) JuniperFig has or had in May 12, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with ameslap
(10) JuniperFig has or had in May 15, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with Dogeington
(11) JuniperFig has or had in May 15, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with ToadKing
(12) JuniperFig has or had in May 10, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with JimmyGamer0911
(13) JuniperFig has or had in May 24, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with JunkCereal
(14) JuniperFig has or had in May 26, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with xdarkkex
(15) JuniperFig Hired all individuals mentioned in facts 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 during her first tenture as Acting Attorney General
(16) JuniperFig has or had in August 17, 2025; a Politicial Or otherwise personal or corporate relationship with AsexualDinosaur
(17) JuniperFig Hired all individuals mentioned in facts 16 during her Second tenture as Acting Attorney General
(18) On may 10th 2025, JuniperFig was appointed by then president 1950minecrafter acting attorney general.
(19) by sheer coincidence, various individuals whom has or had a personal, corporate or otherwise political relationship with the defendant applied on may 10th 2025 for Jobs at the Department Of Justice and immediatly got accepted into the Department of Justice
(20) on the 17th of august 2025, JuniperFig began her 2nd tenture as Acting Attorney General
(21) AsexualDinosaur was appointed Acting Attorney General on the 31st of august 2025.
(22) Several hired individuals During JuniperFig's tentures as attorney general lacked prior legal experience or relevant qualifications for their respective DOJ roles.
(23) The plaintiff as filed at least (1) anonymous tip with the Department of Justice when Juniperfig was Attorney general on her second tenture informing the department that asexualdinosaur was both a prosecutor and the public defender director
(24) No investigations by part of the RBI (and therefore the DoJ) were launched into Juniperfig's unconventional hiring practices
(25) even after the plaintiff filed an anonymous tip, no investigation or otherwise prosecution has begun on AsexualDinosaur and their policy violating office holding
(26) nepotism may be defined as "the unfair practice of granting jobs and other favours to relatives, whether by blood or marriage. Nepotism occurs in all kinds of workplaces and fields, but it is often associated with favouritism in business and politics."
(27) Several of the individuals hired by JuniperFig had direct personal relationships (romantic, marital, or close friendships) with JuniperFig at the time of their hiring.
(28) No competitive hiring process or interviews were conducted for the positions filled on May 10, 2025.
(29) The DoJs "Employment Policy & Code of Conduct" was updated on Aug 22, 2025
(30) The Plaintiff's anonymous tip was filed on August 20th 2025.
(31) 2 days after the plantiff submited the anonymous tip the "Employment Policy & Code of Conduct" was edited from "Not be a Court Clerk or a Public Defender" (or similar meaning) to "Not be a Court Clerk" under the "EMPLOYMENT POLICY" section
(32) shown in facts 30 and 31 Juniperfig as acting AG at the time. Showed nepotistic behavior by editing employment policy to allow a known individual with a personal relationship (marriage) with the defendant to This sequence suggests JuniperFig may have engaged in nepotistic behavior by modifying departmental policy to retroactively legalize or shield her spouse’s dual office holding.
(33) At least one of the individuals hired AsexualDinosaur was in a romantic and marital relationship with JuniperFig during both hiring events, as indicated by Facts (1), (4), (16), and (17).
(34) At the time of JuniperFig's first tenture as Acting Attorney General. She was a member of the Workers party of redmont, at least 50% of the individuals mentioned in facts 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 are or were a member of the Workers' party of Redmont alongside Juniperfig at the time of their hirings

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
(1) Criminal Incompetence

The plaintiff believes that her decisions and actions as Attorney General weren’t just mistakes—they were reckless or negligent to the point of violating the law or her official duties.
(2) Accomplice to Conflict Violation:

The plaintiff is accusing JuniperFig of helping or allowing someone (specifically AsexualDinosaur) to hold two roles that conflict with each other—being both a prosecutor and the Public Defender Director at the same time. That’s a major conflict of interest. By not stopping this or by allowing it to happen, she’s being accused of helping break the rules about fair and impartial justice.
(3) Violation of Departamental Policy

This means JuniperFig broke the rules or policies set by the Department of Justice—specifically those related to hiring or qualifications for certain positions. The complaint also points out that policies may have been changed under her leadership in a way that helped her allies or family members, which would be a clear misuse of authority.
(4) Nepotism
Nepotism is when someone gives special treatment to their friends or family when hiring or making official decisions. The complaint says JuniperFig hired a bunch of people she had personal relationships with—like spouses, friends, or party allies—without fair hiring processes or proper qualifications. It claims this was favoritism, not based on merit.
(5) Corruption
The plaintiff believes JuniperFig used her position for personal gain or to help people close to her in unfair or dishonest ways. That includes hiring friends and spouses, ignoring rules, and possibly changing policies to protect or benefit those people. In short, they’re saying she abused her power for her own interests.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
(1) 750,000.00 in Damages
(2) Removal From Office as President Of The commonwealth of Redmont

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)


P-001

p-002

P-003

p-004

p-005

p-006

p-007

https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/employment-policy-code-of-conduct.17374/

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 31 day of August 2025

 

[Plura72]

Motion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR RECUSAL

The Plaintiff respectfully moves that Justice Smallfries recuse themselves from this case, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:

1. Justice Smallfries has a close personal relationship with the Defendant that could reasonably call into question their ability to remain impartial in this matter.

2. Justice Smallfries currently sits on the Chancery in Alexandria alongside Juniperfig, creating an ongoing professional relationship that presents an actual or perceived conflict of interest.

3. The close personal and professional ties between Justice Smallfries and Juniperfig could reasonably cause parties to question whether Justice Smallfries can render an impartial decision in a case seeking the removal of Defendant from the Vice Presidency.

4. To preserve the integrity of these proceedings, recusal is necessary to avoid any appearance of bias or conflict of interest.

 

[Plura72]

Evidence

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT

The plaintiff respectfully enters the following into evidence


p-008

the defendant in this screenshot shows to consider personal feelings when hiring someone which strenghs the plaintiff's nepotism claim.


p-009

it shows Multiman155 (plaintiff's spouce) deligimizing the plaintiffs claims and lying by claiming that others were denied. during Juniperfig's first tenture the only individual she refused to hire was the defedant investigator applications.

p-010

this can be interpreted as a tactic admission by the plaintiff to nepotism, therefore it is extremely relevant to the case at hand.

 

[Smallfries]

In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court dismisses this case sua sponte for lack of standing. The Plainitff lacks standing to argue before this court under Rule 2.1(3). The removal of officials may only be sought in a criminal trial or when it is alleged that the official obtained their office illegitimately.