Lawsuit: Adjourned Peony Construction V. microflash [2022] FCR 7

Featured Businesses

Status
Not open for further replies.

PiOs67

Citizen
Justice Department
Redmont Bar Association
PiOs67
PiOs67
constable
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION

Peony Construction (Crusaders at Law representing)
Plaintiff

v.

microflash
Defendant

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF
The plaintiff and its employed builder spent time and invested money to fulfill the order of the defendant, but have never been paid for this work, in spite of the contractual relation existing between the two parties.

I. PARTIES
1. Society Peony Construction
2. Microflash

II. FACTS
  1. The defendant get in touch with the society by creating a ticket on the discord server on December 8th 2021.
  2. The defendant accepted the offer made by the plaintiff, negotiated the object of the transaction and cooperated with the builder to get the construction finished.
  3. Once the building finished, the plaintiff billed a price of $4,732.87 to the customer, who clearly accepted it on 22nd of December 2021
  4. After several reminders, the defendant invoked plenty of apologies and lyes to reschedule the payment.
III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
  1. A contract is a meeting between an offer and an acceptation. Written or oral, the contract is legally binding and both parties have to respect their words.
  2. The society Peony Construction offered his services on December 8th 2021 for $3,000 plus the cost of materials, the offer is clear and definitive, which is thus legally binding if accepted.
  3. The defendant expressed an acceptation on December 8th 2021, which was under the suspensive condition of getting a loan to buy the plot.
  4. The suspensive condition have been fulfilled, since the acceptant bought the plot r-094 and have $10,000 left in his bank balance, which is enough to pay my client.
  5. The contract became therefore legally binding. Both parties had to fulfill their obligations.
  6. My client fulfilled his obligations, as the house, object of the transaction, have been built and finished on December 22nd 2021.
  7. The defendant failed to respect the contract, since he didn’t paid for the required services and willfully lied to reschedule the payment.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
  1. $4,732.87 owed by the defendant
  2. $200 in legal fees
  3. $100 as compensation for willfully lying to my client
I would like to summon TheRukia as witness and employed builder of the society Peony Construction

PROOFS:
@Commieflash Welcome.png

@TheRukia how much money.png

Capture d’écran 2022-01-16 à 11.29.07.png
@TheRukia the plot is r-094.png

Realty » Infornation about r-894.png

Capture_decran_2022-01-15_a_13.40.27.png

could you send ss for proof.png
But when will you be able to pay.png

Balance of microflash $10,345.85.png

Capture d’écran 2022-01-16 à 11.51.59.png

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.


DATED: This 16 day of January 2022
 

JoeGamer

Justice
Justice
Public Affairs Department
Redmont Bar Association
Donator
JoeGamer
JoeGamer
judge
1642457499938.png


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
WRIT OF SUMMONS

Microflash is required to appear before the court in the case of the Peony Construction v. Microflash [2022] FCR 7. Failure to appear within 48 hours of this summons will result in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

I'd also like to remind both parties to be aware of the Court Rules and Procedures, including the option of an in-game trial should both parties request one.​
 

PiOs67

Citizen
Justice Department
Redmont Bar Association
PiOs67
PiOs67
constable
Your honor, may I request a default judgement considering the failure of Microflash to appear in front of this court?
 

JoeGamer

Justice
Justice
Public Affairs Department
Redmont Bar Association
Donator
JoeGamer
JoeGamer
judge
Due to the defendants failure to appear, I find him in contempt of court and order the Department of Justice to fine mircroflash $50.

Before the court makes its ruling, please answer the following question.

What was the cost of the materials? Please breakdown all the materials used and its respective cost.
 

PiOs67

Citizen
Justice Department
Redmont Bar Association
PiOs67
PiOs67
constable
Your Honor,
please find attached to this post all the prices provided by the plaintiff.

1642972095900.png
 

JoeGamer

Justice
Justice
Public Affairs Department
Redmont Bar Association
Donator
JoeGamer
JoeGamer
judge

Verdict


Seeing as the defendant has not failed to respond, I hereby rule in favor of the plaintiff in a default judgement. I hereby order the following: $5,032 be transferred from the defendant's balance to the balance of the plaintiff.

Thank you the plaintiff for their time. Case adjourned.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top