Lawsuit: Dismissed nnmc v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] SCR 6

Status
Not open for further replies.

nnmc

Citizen
Redmont Bar Assoc.
nnmc
nnmc
attorney
Joined
Jul 5, 2021
Messages
322
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION


nnmc
Plaintiff

v.

Department of Justice
Defendant

I REQUEST AN EMERGENCY INJUNCTION AGAINST THE SERVING OF THIS WARRANT FOR THE DURATION OF THIS CASE.

COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: The Department of Justice, in closed court, sought a warrant that is excessively broad and unconstitutionally violates the rights of those targeted by the warrant. This warrant is now being executed on the targets with very little transparency. Presumably, the court of first instance for warrants issued this warrant as well, so I presume the Federal Court issued this warrant. I am thus bringing this matter to the Supreme Court.

WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF:
This lawsuit may need to be litigated in closed court, due to the original warrant having been issued in closed court. It may therefore be impossible to have this case in open court when the case is based off of the unconstitutionality of a closed court warrant. This initial filing may also be vague due to the original warrant being closed. I ask the Justices to understand this difficult situation and allow me to further explain my case in closed court.

I. PARTIES
1. nnmc (Plaintiff)
2. Department of Justice (Defendant)
3. Other targets of the warrant who I will not name here due to the warrant being closed

II. FACTS
1. Early in the morning of May 15, 2022, Sgt. BoopingBerry sent a Discord DM to the plaintiff with a closed court warrant. This warrant demanded my private Discord DMs with Individual X, because Individual X was under suspicion for certain crimes. I understand I am being vague here but the warrant being closed leaves me little option. The warrant had absolutely NO restrictions listed on the request, meaning that I am expected to provide my entire DM history with Individual X
2. When I asked the Sgt questions about who requested the warrant, I was given non-answers. I was also told to not tell Individual X anything about this warrant.
3. The warrant is being served on myself and other individuals, but is strangely not being served on the person accused of the crimes in the first place.

III. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
1. Under Section IV Point IV of the Constitution, I am entitled to appeal a charge made against me by the state. The Federal Court, by issuing this warrant, and the Justice Department, by serving it, are implicitly accusing me of a crime with absolutely no probable cause. Therefore, I am bringing this matter to the Supreme Court
2. Under Section IV Point XIV of the Constitution, I am entitled to not be deprived of life, liberty, and security except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. There may be a reasonable suspicion that Individual X has committed a crime, but there is no such suspicion upon me. I am confident of this because the warrant's scope is so excessively broad and targets so many people, whose only mutual connection is Individual X. It is clear then that the Justice Department suspects Individual X has committed a crime and is grasping for straws by targeting their acquaintances. It would be consistent with the principles of fundamental justice for a warrant to be served against Individual X, but it could not be further from justice to issue a warrant that broadly targets people simply for being connected to someone accused of a crime.
3. Under Section IV Point XII of the Constitution, I am entitled to freedom of association. I should be able to associate with Individual X, without fear of being considered guilty by association if Individual X is accused of a crime.
4. Under Section IV Point XV of the Constitution, I am entitled to not be unreasonable searched or seized. The Justice Department is trying to search me for no good reason, other than the fact that I am associated with Individual X.

IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Plaintiff seeks the following from the Defendant:
1. A permanent injunction against this warrant being served
2. The removal from office of the judge who issued this unconstitutional warrant

I have evidence to provide and I would wish to do so in a closed court forum, due to the fact that this evidence shows a closed court warrant.

By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am subject to perjury should I knowingly make a false statement in court.

DATED: This 15th day of May 2022
 
Before the Supreme Court can rule on an emergency injunction we need to see the evidence. We would like to ask that the Plaintiff joins us in closed Court.
 
1652635348815.png

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Dismissal & Court Order


The Supreme Court has voted to dismiss this case. From all current records held by the courts, no evidence appears to suggest the existence of any warrant request requested by BoopingBerry and approved by Judge Dygyee. Because this case is based off of a warrant that does not exist, the Supreme Court will not be hearing this case.
The Supreme Court has decided that since no formal request was made for this Search Warrant, the Search Warrant is declared null and void and the execution of this search warrant by the Department of Justice cease immediately.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top